Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Prevalence of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in suspected papilloedema in children

Abstract

Purpose

Suspected papilloedema is a frequent cause of referral to paediatric ophthalmology clinics. Recent publications have described a new finding called peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) that may cause pseudopapilloedema. We evaluated the optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of the optic nerve in all children referred with suspected papilloedema for the presence of PHOMS and report their frequency.

Methods

The optic nerve OCT scans from children seen in our suspected papilloedema virtual clinic between August 2016 and March 2021 were evaluated for the presence of PHOMS by three assessors. A Fleiss’ kappa statistic was calculated to test the agreement between the assessors for the presence of PHOMS.

Results

A total of 220 scans from 110 patients were evaluated during the study period. The mean patient age was 11.2 SD ± 3.4, (range 4.1–16.8). PHOMS were identified in at least one eye in 74 (67.3%) patients. Of these, 42 (56.8%) patients had bilateral and 32 (43.2%) had unilateral PHOMS. Excellent agreement between assessors for the presence of PHOMS (Fleiss’ kappa 0.9865) was observed. PHOMS were common in association with other identified causes of pseudopapilloedema (81.25%) but were also common in papilloedema (66.67%) and otherwise normal discs (55.36%).

Conclusions

Misdiagnosis of papilloedema can lead to unnecessary and invasive tests. PHOMS are found frequently within the paediatric population referred for suspected disc swelling. They appear to be an independent cause of pseudopapilloedema but are often seen in conjunction with true papilloedema and other causes of pseudopapilloedema.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Dahlmann-Noor AH, Adams GW, Daniel MC, Davis A, Hancox J, Hingorani M, et al. Detecting optic nerve head swelling on ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in children and young people: an observational study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:318–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kovarik JJ, Doshi PN, Collinge JE, Plager DA. Outcome of pediatric patients referred for papilledema. J AAPOS. 2015;19:344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poostchi A, Awad M, Wilde C, Dineen RA, Gruener AM. Spike in neuroimaging requests following the conviction of the optometrist Honey Rose. Eye. 2018;32:489–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanch RJ, Horsburgh J, Creavin A, DOPS Study Group, Burdon MA, Williams C. Detection of Papilloedema Study (DOPS): rates of false positive papilloedema in the community. Eye. 2019;33:1073–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Borrelli E, Barboni P, Battista M, Sacconi R, Querques L, Cascavilla ML, et al. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS): OCTA may reveal new findings. Eye. 2021;35:528–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mezad-Koursh D, Klein A, Rosenblatt A, Teper Roth S, Neudorfer M, Loewenstein A, et al. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures-a novel entity as frequent cause of pseudopapilloedema in children. Eye. 2021;35:1228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malmqvist L, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Digre K, Fraser JA, Fraser C, et al. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures: is it optic disc drusen or not? Response. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:568–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser JA, Sibony PA, Petzold A, Thaung C, Hamann S, ODDS Consortium. Peripapillary hyper-reflective ovoid mass-like structure (PHOMS): an optical coherence tomography marker of axoplasmic stasis in the optic nerve head. J Neuroophthalmol. 2021;41:431–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures: is it optic disc drusen or not? J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:567–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malmqvist L, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Digre K, Fraser JA, Fraser C, et al. The optic disc drusen studies consortium recommendations for diagnosis of optic disc drusen using optical coherence tomography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang DD, Leong JCY, Gale J, Wells AP. Multimodal imaging of buried optic nerve head drusen. Eye. 2018;32:1145–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: PW; data collection: LP, SR, JW; analysis and interpretation of results: LP, PW; draft manuscript preparation: LP, SR, JW, PW. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Pratt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pratt, L., Rehan, S., West, J. et al. Prevalence of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in suspected papilloedema in children. Eye 37, 3209–3212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02489-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02489-w

Search

Quick links