Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Clinical value of body composition monitor to evaluate lean and fat tissue mass in peritoneal dialysis

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Bioimpedance analysis is often routinely performed in any dialysis unit to guide fluid management but can provide a reproduceable assessment of fat and muscle mass. We wished to determine the clinical significance of low muscle or high fat mass and the determinants that influence their change.

Subjects/Methods

We performed retrospective analysis of 824 patients on peritoneal dialysis who underwent routine repeated bioimpedance analysis measurements using the body composition monitor (BCM).

Results

Lean tissue index (LTI) was an independent predictor of mortality when sex, age, PD vintage and diabetes status were included in the models (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86–1.00, p < 0.05) and when baseline serum albumin was included in a separate model (HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.79–0.93, p < 0.001). High fat tissue index (FTI) was an independent predictor of mortality when demographic factors were included (HR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78–0.97, p < 0.02), but not with the addition biochemical parameters. Changes in body composition of 206 patients over a 2-year follow-up period could not be predicted by baseline demographics, functional or biochemical assessments. However, there was a strong inverse relationship between changes in LTI and FTI. There were no associations between changes in body composition with prescribed dialysate glucose.

Conclusions

We showed body composition changes are common and complex. LTI was an independent predictor of survival. Changes in LTI and FTI could not be predicted by baseline parameters. BCM may be a sensitive and accurate tool to monitor changes in body composition during dialysis treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Wesson DE, Wolman SL, Stewart S, Whitewell J, et al. Nutritional assessment: a comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:969–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, Johnston N, Whittaker S, Mendelson RA, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1987;11:8–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tangvoraphonkchai K, Hung R, Sadeghi-Alavijeh O, Davenport A. Differences in prevalence of muscle weakness (sarcopenia) in haemodialysis patients determined by hand grip strength due to variation in guideline definitions of sarcopenia. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33:255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jolly S, Chatatalsingh C, Bargman J, Vas S, Chu M, Oreopoulos DG. Excessive weight gain during peritoneal dialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 2001;24:197–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JK, Kim YS, Song YR, Kim HJ, Kim SG, Moon SJ. Excessive weight gain during the first year of peritoneal dialysis is associated with inflammation, diabetes mellitus, and a rapid decrease in residual renal function. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003;63:793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vareldzis R, Naljayan M, Reisin E. The incidence and pathophysiology of the obesity paradox: should peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplant be offered to patients with obesity and end-stage renal disease? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avram MM, Fein PA, Borawski C, Chattopadhyay J, Matza B. Extracellular mass/body cell mass ratio is an independent predictor of survival in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 2010;78(Suppl 117):S37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koh KH, Wong HS, Go KW, Morad Z. Normalized bioimpedance indices are better predictors of outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31:574–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molina P, Vizcaino B, Molina MD, Beltran S, Gonzalez-Moya M, Mora A, et al. The effect of high-volume online haemodiafiltration on nutritional status and body composition: the ProtEin Stores prEservaTion (PESET) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33:1223–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kittiskulnam P, Chertow GM, Carrero JJ, Delgado C, Kaysen GA, Johansen KL. Sarcopenia and its individual criteria are associated, in part, with mortality among patients on hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2017;92:238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmadi SF, Zahmatkesh G, Streja E, Mehrotra R, Rhee CM, Kovesdy CP, et al. Association of body mass index with mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36:315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiran VR, Zhu TY, Yip T, Lui SL, Lo WK. Body mass index and mortality risk in Asian peritoneal dialysis patients in Hong Kong-impact of diabetes and cardiovascular disease status. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34:390–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu J, Zeng X, Hong HG, Li Y, Fu P. The association between body mass index and mortality among Asian peritoneal dialysis patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi SJ, Kim EJ, Park MY, Kim JK, Hwang SD. Does body fat mass define survival in patients starting peritoneal dialysis? Perit Dial Int. 2014;34:376–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Badve SV, Paul SK, Klein K, Clayton PA, Hawley CM, Brown FG, et al. The association between body mass index and mortality in incident dialysis patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong L, Cao S, Xu F, Zhou Q, Fan L, Xu Q, et al. Association of body mass index and body mass index change with mortality in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Nutrients. 2015;7:8444–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan S, Davenport A. Does increased glucose exposure lead to increased body fat and reduced lean body mass in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:1253–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Caron-Lienert RS, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE, Figueiredo A, da Costa BEP, Crepaldi C, Pizzato AC, et al. The influence of glucose exposure load and peritoneal membrane transport on body composition and nutritional status changes after 1 year on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2017;37:458–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho LC, Yen CJ, Chao CT, Chiang CK, Huang JW, Hung KY. Visceral fat area is associated with HbA1c but not dialysate-related glucose load in nondiabetic PD patients. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernardo AP, Oliveira JC, Santos O, Carvalho MJ, Cabrita A, Rodrigues A. Insulin resistance in nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients: associations with body composition, peritoneal transport, and peritoneal glucose absorption. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:2205–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lo WK. Metabolic syndrome and obesity in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2016;35:10–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Obi Y, Streja E, Mehrotra R, Rivara MB, Rhee CM, Soohoo M, et al. Impact of obesity on modality longevity, residual kidney function, peritonitis, and survival among incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71:802–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Davenport A. Does peritoneal dialysate affect body composition assessments using multi-frequency bioimpedance in peritoneal dialysis patients? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:223–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Paudel K, Visser A, Burke S, Samad N, Fan SL. Can bioimpedance measurements of lean and fat tissue mass replace subjective global assessments in peritoneal dialysis patients?. J Ren Nutr. 2015;25:480–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Omichi Y, Srivareerat M, Panorchan K, Greenhall GH, Gupta S, Davenport A. Measurement of muscle strength in haemodialysis patients by pinch and hand grip strength and comparison to lean body mass measured by multifrequency bio-electrical impedance. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;68:268–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoowannakul S, Tangvoraphonkchai K, Davenport A. The prevalence of muscle wasting (sarcopenia) in peritoneal dialysis patients varies with ethnicity due to differences in muscle mass measured by bioimpedance. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:381–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded through local departmental funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanley L. Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Prior to 2014, SLF received lecture fees from Fresenius Medical Care.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parthasarathy, R., Oei, E. & Fan, S.L. Clinical value of body composition monitor to evaluate lean and fat tissue mass in peritoneal dialysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 1520–1528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0391-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0391-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links