Abstract
The low crystallinity of cellulose II makes industrial use a major challenge. In our previous report, we proposed a mechanism for improvement of the crystallinity of cellulose II during posttreatment with a dilute NaOH solution. Specifically, rearrangements of the cellulose molecules occurred only near inaccessible surfaces through which NaOH penetrated, resulting in conversion into crystalline regions. To verify our proposed mechanism and to improve the crystallinity further, we performed both long-term single-cycle and multicycle posttreatments with dilute NaOH solutions. Multiple posttreatment cycles under optimal conditions increased the crystallinity by up to approximately 20%. In contrast, long-term single-cycle posttreatment led to crystallinity improvements of only up to approximately 10%. Changes in the proportions of the regions during multiple cycles after treatment supported our proposed mechanism. During multiple posttreatment cycles, the products were converted to crystalline regions only on the inaccessible surfaces enlarged by the previous posttreatment cycle, which increased the crystal sizes in each cycle. Optimization of the treatment times used during the multiple posttreatment cycles led to crystallinity improvements with fewer posttreatment cycles. Our investigations of the mechanism for crystallinity improvement will contribute to structural elucidation of cellulose II and the efficient preparation of highly crystalline cellulose II.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data will be made available upon reasonable request.
References
Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:3358–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587.
O’Sullivan AC. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose. 1997;4:173–207.
Isobe N, Kim UJ, Kimura S, Wada M, Kuga S. Internal surface polarity of regenerated cellulose gel depends on the species used as coagulant. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;359:194–201.
Östlund Å, Idström A, Olsson C, Larsson PT, Nordstierna L. Modification of crystallinity and pore size distribution in coagulated cellulose films. Cellulose. 2013;20:1657–67.
Liu Z, Sun X, Hao M, Huang C, Xue Z, Mu T. Preparation and characterization of regenerated cellulose from ionic liquid using different methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;117:99–105.
Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H. X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2:410–6.
Colom X, Carrillo F. Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibres by caustic treatment. Eur Polym J. 2002;38:2225–30.
Široký J, Blackburn RS, Bechtold T, Taylor J, White P. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis of crystallinity changes in lyocell following continuous treatment with sodium hydroxide. Cellulose. 2010;17:103–15.
Manjunath BR, Venkataraman A. Fibrillar aggregation in cotton cellulose subjected to multiple swelling treatments with alkali. J Polym Sci: Polym Chem Ed. 1980;18:1407–24.
Hirota M, Tamura N, Saito T, Isogai A. Cellulose II nanoelements prepared from fully mercerized, partially mercerized and regenerated celluloses by 4-acetamido-TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2 oxidation. Cellulose. 2012;19:435–42.
Daicho K, Fujisawa S, Saito T. Linear correlation between true density and crystallinity of regenerated and mercerized celluloses. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:661–6.
Nomura S, Kugo Y, Erata T. 13C NMR and XRD studies on the enhancement of cellulose II crystallinity with low concentration NaOH post-treatments. Cellulose. 2020;27:3553–63.
Larsson PT, Wickholm K, Iversen T. A CP/MAS 13C NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohydr Res. 1997;302:19–25.
Zuckerstätter G, Terinte N, Sixta H, Schuster KC. Novel insight into cellulose supramolecular structure through 13C CP-MAS NMR spectroscopy and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. in. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;93:122–8.
Kirui A, Ling Z, Kang X, Dickwella Widanage MC, Mentink-Vigier F, French AD, et al. Atomic resolution of cotton cellulose structure enabled by dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR. Cellulose. 2019;26:329–39.
Massiot D, Fayon F, Capron M, King I, Le Calvé S, Alonso B, et al. Modelling one- and two-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra. Magn Reson Chem. 2002;40:70–76.
Idström A, Schantz S, Sundberg J, Chmelka BF, Gatenholm P, Nordstierna L. 13C NMR assignments of regenerated cellulose from solid-state 2D NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:480–7.
Kobayashi K, Kimura S, Togawa E, Wada M. Crystal transition from Na-cellulose IV to cellulose II monitored using synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83:483–8.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Toshifumi Hiraoki and Mr. Naoya Nakagawa of the Instrumental Analysis Support Office, Frontier Chemistry Center, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, for their assistance with the NMR measurements. The authors would also like to thank the staff at the High Brilliance X-Lay Laboratory, Hokkaido University, for allowing the use of their X-ray diffractometer. We would like to thank American Journal Experts (www.aje.com) and Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yuki Kugo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft. Satoshi Nomura: conceptualization and methodology. Takuya Isono: Supervision. Masashi Fujiwara: Supervision. Toshifumi Satoh: Supervision. Hirofumi Tani: Supervision. Tomoki Erata: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing. Kenji Tajima: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kugo, Y., Nomura, S., Isono, T. et al. Crystallinity improvements in cellulose II after multiple posttreatment cycles with a dilute NaOH solution. Polym J 56, 517–527 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00890-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00890-0