Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Crystallinity improvements in cellulose II after multiple posttreatment cycles with a dilute NaOH solution

Abstract

The low crystallinity of cellulose II makes industrial use a major challenge. In our previous report, we proposed a mechanism for improvement of the crystallinity of cellulose II during posttreatment with a dilute NaOH solution. Specifically, rearrangements of the cellulose molecules occurred only near inaccessible surfaces through which NaOH penetrated, resulting in conversion into crystalline regions. To verify our proposed mechanism and to improve the crystallinity further, we performed both long-term single-cycle and multicycle posttreatments with dilute NaOH solutions. Multiple posttreatment cycles under optimal conditions increased the crystallinity by up to approximately 20%. In contrast, long-term single-cycle posttreatment led to crystallinity improvements of only up to approximately 10%. Changes in the proportions of the regions during multiple cycles after treatment supported our proposed mechanism. During multiple posttreatment cycles, the products were converted to crystalline regions only on the inaccessible surfaces enlarged by the previous posttreatment cycle, which increased the crystal sizes in each cycle. Optimization of the treatment times used during the multiple posttreatment cycles led to crystallinity improvements with fewer posttreatment cycles. Our investigations of the mechanism for crystallinity improvement will contribute to structural elucidation of cellulose II and the efficient preparation of highly crystalline cellulose II.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data will be made available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:3358–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Sullivan AC. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose. 1997;4:173–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Isobe N, Kim UJ, Kimura S, Wada M, Kuga S. Internal surface polarity of regenerated cellulose gel depends on the species used as coagulant. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;359:194–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Östlund Å, Idström A, Olsson C, Larsson PT, Nordstierna L. Modification of crystallinity and pore size distribution in coagulated cellulose films. Cellulose. 2013;20:1657–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Z, Sun X, Hao M, Huang C, Xue Z, Mu T. Preparation and characterization of regenerated cellulose from ionic liquid using different methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;117:99–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H. X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2:410–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Colom X, Carrillo F. Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibres by caustic treatment. Eur Polym J. 2002;38:2225–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Široký J, Blackburn RS, Bechtold T, Taylor J, White P. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis of crystallinity changes in lyocell following continuous treatment with sodium hydroxide. Cellulose. 2010;17:103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manjunath BR, Venkataraman A. Fibrillar aggregation in cotton cellulose subjected to multiple swelling treatments with alkali. J Polym Sci: Polym Chem Ed. 1980;18:1407–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirota M, Tamura N, Saito T, Isogai A. Cellulose II nanoelements prepared from fully mercerized, partially mercerized and regenerated celluloses by 4-acetamido-TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2 oxidation. Cellulose. 2012;19:435–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daicho K, Fujisawa S, Saito T. Linear correlation between true density and crystallinity of regenerated and mercerized celluloses. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:661–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nomura S, Kugo Y, Erata T. 13C NMR and XRD studies on the enhancement of cellulose II crystallinity with low concentration NaOH post-treatments. Cellulose. 2020;27:3553–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsson PT, Wickholm K, Iversen T. A CP/MAS 13C NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohydr Res. 1997;302:19–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuckerstätter G, Terinte N, Sixta H, Schuster KC. Novel insight into cellulose supramolecular structure through 13C CP-MAS NMR spectroscopy and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. in. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;93:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirui A, Ling Z, Kang X, Dickwella Widanage MC, Mentink-Vigier F, French AD, et al. Atomic resolution of cotton cellulose structure enabled by dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR. Cellulose. 2019;26:329–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Massiot D, Fayon F, Capron M, King I, Le Calvé S, Alonso B, et al. Modelling one- and two-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra. Magn Reson Chem. 2002;40:70–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Idström A, Schantz S, Sundberg J, Chmelka BF, Gatenholm P, Nordstierna L. 13C NMR assignments of regenerated cellulose from solid-state 2D NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:480–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobayashi K, Kimura S, Togawa E, Wada M. Crystal transition from Na-cellulose IV to cellulose II monitored using synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83:483–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Toshifumi Hiraoki and Mr. Naoya Nakagawa of the Instrumental Analysis Support Office, Frontier Chemistry Center, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, for their assistance with the NMR measurements. The authors would also like to thank the staff at the High Brilliance X-Lay Laboratory, Hokkaido University, for allowing the use of their X-ray diffractometer. We would like to thank American Journal Experts (www.aje.com) and Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yuki Kugo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft. Satoshi Nomura: conceptualization and methodology. Takuya Isono: Supervision. Masashi Fujiwara: Supervision. Toshifumi Satoh: Supervision. Hirofumi Tani: Supervision. Tomoki Erata: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing. Kenji Tajima: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Tajima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kugo, Y., Nomura, S., Isono, T. et al. Crystallinity improvements in cellulose II after multiple posttreatment cycles with a dilute NaOH solution. Polym J 56, 517–527 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00890-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00890-0

Search

Quick links