Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical Studies

Trajectory patterns and cumulative burden of CEA during follow-up with non-small cell lung cancer outcomes: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Abstract

Background

Previous studies of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) focused on CEA measured at a single time point, ignoring serial CEA measurements.

Methods

This retrospective cohort included 2959 patients underwent surgery for stage I-III NSCLC. CEA trajectory patterns and long-term cumulative CEA burden were evaluated using the latent class growth mixture model.

Results

Four CEA trajectory groups were identified, named as low-stable, decreasing, early-rising and later-rising. Compared with the low-stable group, the adjusted hazard ratios associated with death were 1.27, 4.50, and 3.68 for the other groups. Cumulative CEA burden were positively associated with the risk of death in patients not belonging to the low-stable group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates decreased from 62.3% to 33.0% for the first and fourth quantile groups of cumulative CEA burden. Jointly, patients with decreasing CEA trajectory could be further divided into the decreasing & low and decreasing & high group, with 5-year OS rates to be 77.9% and 47.1%. Patients with rising CEA trajectory and high cumulative CEA were found to be more likely to develop bone metastasis.

Conclusions

Longitudinal trajectory patterns and long-term cumulative burden of CEA were independent prognostic factors of NSCLC. We recommend CEA in postoperative surveillance of NSCLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Longitudinal CEA trajectory patterns and non-small cell lung cancer outcomes.
Fig. 2: CEA joint groups defined by CEA trajectory patterns and cumulative CEA burden with non-small cell lung cancer outcomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to individuals’ privacy that participated in the study. The data will be shared at a reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Code availability

All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.1.3), with two-sided statistical significance set at a P value < 0.05. LCGMM and JLCMM were implemented with package “lcmm” (version 1.9.2). The χ2 proportion test was performed with Harrell’s R package “rms” (version 6.5.0).

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen P, Liu Y, Wen Y, Zhou C. Non-small cell lung cancer in China. Cancer Commun. 2022;42:937–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012;76:138–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Molina R, Auge JM, Bosch X, Escudero JM, Vinolas N, Marrades R, et al. Usefulness of serum tumor markers, including progastrin-releasing peptide, in patients with lung cancer: correlation with histology. Tumour Biol. 2009;30:121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National-Comprehensive-Cancer-Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. (Version 2.2023). Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2023).

  7. Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, Senan S, Waller DA, Vansteenkiste J, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:iv1–iv21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiao Z, Cao S, Li J, Hu N, Gong Y, Wang L, et al. Clinical Associations of Preoperative and Postoperative Serum CEA and Lung Cancer Outcome. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:686313.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang CY, Huang MS, Huang MH, Lee HC, Hsu HS. Persistently high serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels after surgery indicate poor prognosis in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Surg Res. 2010;163:e45–e50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomita M, Ayabe T, Chosa E, Nakamura K. Postoperative Serum CEA level is a more significant prognostic factor than post/preoperative serum CEA ratio in non-small cell cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:7809–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozu Y, Maniwa T, Takahashi S, Isaka M, Ohde Y, Nakajima T. Prognostic significance of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with completely resected pathological-stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nasralla A, Lee J, Dang J, Turner S. Elevated preoperative CEA is associated with subclinical nodal involvement and worse survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15:318.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang XB, Li J, Han Y. Prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:10105–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Zhang D, Pang X, Pu H, Lei M, Fan B, et al. Trajectories of perioperative serum tumor markers and colorectal cancer outcomes: a retrospective, multicenter longitudinal cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2021;74:103706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozeki N, Fukui T, Taniguchi T, Usami N, Kawaguchi K, Ito S, et al. Significance of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen level during the follow-up of patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45:687–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu L, Gao S, He J, Hu J, Ge D, Li H, et al. Chinese thoracic surgery experts consensus on postoperative follow-up plans for non-small cell lung cancer patients. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;28:4–10. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Proust-Lima C, Philipps V, Liquet B. Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package lcmm. J Stat Softw. 2017;78:1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cook NR, Rosner BA, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Using the area under the curve to reduce measurement error in predicting young adult blood pressure from childhood measures. Stat Med. 2004;23:3421–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pages F, Mlecnik B, Marliot F, Bindea G, Ou FS, Bifulco C, et al. International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet. 2018;391:2128–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrell F E. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. R package version 6.5-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms (2023).

  21. Wang P, Shen W, Boye ME. Joint modeling of longitudinal outcomes and survival using latent growth modeling approach in a mesothelioma trial. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2012;12:182–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sawabata N, Maeda H, Yokota S, Takeda S, Koma M, Tokunaga T, et al. Postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with pathologic stage IA nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: subnormal levels as an indicator of favorable prognosis. Cancer. 2004;101:803–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomita M, Matsuzaki Y, Shimizu T, Hara M, Ayabe T, Onitsuka T. Prognostic determinants for lung cancer patients with preoperative high serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;53:300–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Okada M, Nishio W, Sakamoto T, Uchino K, Yuki T, Nakagawa A, et al. Prognostic significance of perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of 1,000 consecutive resections for clinical stage I disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Z, Li C, Pu H, Pang X, Wang Y, Zhang D, et al. Trajectories of perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and colorectal cancer outcome: A retrospective, multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11:e293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen H, Jiang Y, Jia K, Zhang K, Matsuura N, Jeong JY, et al. Prognostic significance of postoperative longitudinal change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma completely resected by single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery: a retrospective study. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10:3983–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson JA, Grunert F, Zimmermann W. Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: molecular biology and clinical perspectives. J Clin Lab Anal. 1991;5:344–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blumenthal RD, Hansen HJ, Goldenberg DM. Inhibition of adhesion, invasion, and metastasis by antibodies targeting CEACAM6 (NCA-90) and CEACAM5 (Carcinoembryonic Antigen). Cancer Res. 2005;65:8809–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arrieta O, Saavedra-Perez D, Kuri R, Aviles-Salas A, Martinez L, Mendoza-Posada D, et al. Brain metastasis development and poor survival associated with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective analysis. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferreira IG, Carrascal M, Mineiro AG, Bugalho A, Borralho P, Silva Z, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen is a sialyl Lewis x/a carrier and an E‑selectin ligand in non‑small cell lung cancer. Int J Oncol. 2019;55:1033–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohwada A, Takahashi H, Nagaoka I, Iwabuchi K, Mikami O, Kira S. Effect of cigarette smoke on the mRNA and protein expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a possible chemoattractant for neutrophils in human bronchioloalveolar tissues. Thorax. 1995;50:651–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao C, Zhang G, Zhang L. Serum CEA levels in 49 different types of cancer and noncancer diseases. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2019;162:213–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a joint effort of many investigators and staff members, and their contribution is gratefully acknowledged. We especially thank all patients who participated in this study.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers [82222064, 82073569], Shandong University Distinguished Young Scholars, the Outstanding Youth Science Foundation of Yunnan Basic Research Project [202101AW070001], the Reserve Talent Project for Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technical Leaders [2012005AC160023], the Key Science Foundation of Yunnan Basic Research [202101AS070040], and the Innovative Research Team of Yunnan Province [202405AS350016].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LC, YD, LZ, ZT did the concept and study design. LC, LZ, ZD, PX, PH and LM participated in the collection and assembly of data. LC, YD, LZ, ZT designed the latent class growth mixed model. LC, YD, LZ, ZT, FB, LJ did the statistical analysis and gave interpreted the results. LC draughted the manuscript, and ZT, LZ revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript, and approved its final submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenhui Li, Dingyun You or Tao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participants

This retrospective study was approved by the ethics committee of Yunnan Cancer Hospital. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the board, owing to the study’s retrospective nature. All the patient data in the survey were anonymized.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Liu, L., You, R. et al. Trajectory patterns and cumulative burden of CEA during follow-up with non-small cell lung cancer outcomes: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Br J Cancer (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02678-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02678-8

Search

Quick links