Sir, we were saddened to read the description of the punishment meted out to some worn teeth in the second paper on Centric relation and increasing the occlusal vertical dimension. (BDJ 2021; 230: 83-89).

The first paper on the topic was riddled with old myths and fallacies about occlusion and wear, but the second paper caused us even more concern. It described a patient with localised anterior tooth surface loss with an obvious erosive component. All four canines and first premolars were in contact with one another and all the visible teeth had their marginal ridges intact - where most of their strength is. Traditional deprogramming devices are considered largely irrelevant when managing localised anterior tooth surface loss - unless wholly unnecessary gross dental destruction of moderately worn incisor teeth is chosen to be undertaken.

Sadly, six anterior teeth suffered an unprovoked attack with an airotor to provide one path of insertion for what Figure 22 described, euphemistically, as 'minimal reduction for 360-degree veneers'. However, that clinical picture showed completeremoval of enamel to receive six ceramic full crowns which did about 40 years' worth of structural damage - apparently justified by some old nonsense about occlusion, vertical dimension and wear.1 That amount of elective, irreversible tooth destruction is not what we understand is normally involved when the word 'veneer' is used.

The biologically sensible approach to this sort of tooth wear was not further subtraction from the worn teeth, as described, but rather one utilising additive resin composite bonding, which was described as long ago as 2003 by Redman and colleagues2 and since then confirmed as being successful by many other clinicians in different locations.3,4,5,6

A systematic review by Mesko et al.7 concluded that 'rehabilitation with direct resin composite is undoubtedly more conservative than tooth preparations for full or partial indirect restorations […] this offers good clinical results and satisfied patients'. Recent research has shown that when longevity of a restored anterior tooth is measured, crowns result in decreased longevity of the tooth when compared with direct restorations.8

Resin composite additions bonded at an increased anterior occlusal vertical dimension have been shown consistently to be very effective for managing worn teeth, while leaving all the strength inherent in their marginal ridges still available for the patient's future needs. Lastly, the supposed '360-degree veneers' term confounds us. We do like to use words properly and therefore ask gently 'did the consent record specify the word veneers?' If it did, then what was done to those unfortunate teeth might not be defensible on Montgomery consent grounds.