Abstract
Metastatic spread to the oral cavity is a rare entity, comprising 1% of oral malignancies. However, 25% of oral metastases are found to be the initial sign of metastatic spread; therefore, initial presentation in the oral cavity may indicate significant underlying disease. Common primary sites for men include the prostate, lung, kidney and liver. For women, it is the breast, kidney, colon and genital organs. General dental practitioners are in a unique position to identify and instigate rapid referrals as gatekeepers of primary care whereby patients commonly present to them with symptoms. This clinical review article aims to educate dental practitioners on appropriate recognition of oral metastatic pathology and referral to secondary care.
Sarah Jadun, Lara Zebic and Vinod Patel educate dental practitioners on appropriate recognition of oral metastatic pathology and referral to secondary care.
Introduction
Cancer is the result of abnormal proliferation of different cells in the body.1 It is a multistage process which involves the mutation and rapid reproduction of cells with increased scope for survival, proliferation and invasion. Metastases involve the spread of cancer cells to sites beyond where the tumour originated and the formation of secondary and tertiary sites.
The oral and maxillofacial region is noted to be an exceptional site for metastatic deposits with approximately 1% of oral malignancies caused by metastases,2 although it has been suggested that the actual incidence of metastatic spread to the jaws may be higher. A study conducted by Hashimoto et al.3 found that despite any indicative radiographic findings, histologically proven micrometastatic foci in the jaws were found in 16% of autopsied carcinoma cases.3 Hence, early detection and incorporation into differential diagnoses of certain oral lesions is important.
As the gatekeepers of primary care, general dental practitioners (GDPs) are in a unique position to first encounter oral metastatic lesions as patients will commonly present to them with symptoms.4 Hence, appropriate recognition of pathology, further investigations and timely referral are key elements for GDPs to appreciate.
Epidemiology
Most cases of oral metastases are found in the presence of widespread disease. With that being said, almost 25% of oral metastases are found to be the initial sign of metastatic spread and in 23% it is the initial sign of undiagnosed malignancy at a differing site.5 Ages range widely and is often seen between those who are 40-70 years old.6 The male-to-female ratio of metastases to the jaw bones is equal, however, in soft tissues at 2:1.6
Origin of the primary tumour
Oral metastases can be caused by almost any malignant tumour. However, the origin of the metastatic lesion can differ between sexes. For men, common primary sites include the prostate, lung, kidney and liver.6 For women, metastatic spread is commonly from the breast, kidney, colon and genital organs. In men, the lung and prostate primary sites have an affinity for jawbones while in women, breast cancer is the most common primary tumour.5 Interestingly, prevalence of the primary tumour is not always consistent with the frequency of metastases to the oral cavity. This is attributed to the different biologic behaviours of the tumours and their affinity for tissues in the oral cavity.7 An example of such is pancreatic cancer, a highly aggressive tumour that is rarely reported to spread to the oral cavity.5
Hard tissue metastatic presentation exhibiting in the jaws may present with toothache and tooth mobility.
Although metastatic lesions can be found anywhere in the head and neck region, the mandible appears to be the dominant site. In particular, the molar region accounts for over 50% of cases followed by the premolar region (38%) and the angle of the mandible (29%).5 It is hypothesised that the haematopoietic marrow in the posterior aspect of the mandible serves as a favourable niche of metastatic tumour cells. Considering soft tissue, the gingivae rank highly for oral metastatic spread.8
Carcinoma of unknown primary
The term carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is denoted following the diagnosis of a metastasis in which the primary tumour cannot be identified following extensive investigations. This can present in the oral cavity. There are variations in the literature regarding the strict definition of the CUP, subsequently leading to an incidence range of 0.3-2%.9,10. With advancing techniques in cell and molecular biology, it is possible to determine the primary tumour site of a CUP if it has retained the signature cancer molecules.
Clinical presentation
The clinical presentation of metastatic tumours varies depending on the site affected (Fig. 1). The attached gingivae, followed by the tongue, are the most frequent soft tissue sites involved. Gingival metastases may resemble hyperplastic or reactive lesions or present similarly to pyogenic granuloma, fibrous epulis, peripheral giant cell granuloma or a periodontal abscess in the early stages.11 Hence, they exhibit clinical signs such as exophytic lesions which are highly vascularised and therefore bleed easily or even spontaneously.12 Equally, these lesions could present as a submucosal mass5 and are therefore not easily visible but digitally palpable. Patient complaints include pain, ulceration, bleeding and swelling; symptoms already well recognised in primary oral cancer.
Hard tissue metastatic presentation exhibiting in the jaws may present with toothache and tooth mobility, mimicking dental or periodontal disease13(Fig. 2). In some cases, metastases may only be discovered after dental extraction at the problematic site. It is assumed the tumour was present in the site before extraction, causing symptoms of pain, swelling and mobility of teeth. The clinician may then extract the teeth based on these symptoms, with the tooth extraction promoting the metastatic process and the tumour presenting as a painful soft tissue mass in the site of the extraction.6 Metastatic disease can mimic odontogenic infections thereby leading to a delayed diagnosis. It must be noted that in 23% of cases, metastatic lesions in the oral cavity may be the first indication of malignancy not yet discovered at a distant site.14
Paraesthesia is often reported when the metastasis is located in the area innervated by the inferior dental or mental nerve, also known as 'numb chin syndrome' or 'mental nerve neuropathy' (Fig. 3). This sign occurring in a spontaneous manner, without any underlying causes such as trauma, odontogenic infection or pathology, should be considered as needing urgent investigation to eliminate a sinister diagnosis, such as malignancy. Its occurrence in cancer signifies deep invasion of the tumour into the bone involving the neurovascular structures. Physical examination may reveal a bony swelling with tenderness over the affected site. In late cases, pathological fracture can be noted (Fig. 4), with patients presenting with pain, deranged occlusion and mucosal ulceration.
Radiographic presentation
Neoplasms with a favourable affinity to bone in advanced disease include breast, prostate, kidney and lung neoplasms.15 Bone marrow cells provide a niche environment for metastatic tumour cells.16 The radiographic appearance of bone metastases can be non-specific; however, suspicion should be raised when lesions present as lytic radiolucent lesions with ill-defined margins with a 'moth-eaten' appearance (Fig. 5).17 Mixed or pure radiopacity is another presentation of some metastatic tumours. Literature shows that 50% of prostate tumours present as pure radiopaque or as mixed lucent and opaque lesions, while 40% as purely radiolucent lesions.18 Bone metastases from kidney, lung or breast cancers are often more osteolytic.19,20,21 They may also occur as a solitary radiolucency, simulating an infected cyst or osteomyelitis. Cortical bone of structures such as the inferior dental canal, maxillary sinus and nasal floor may also be resorbed and present with a periosteal reaction.22 It must be noted that in approximately 5% of cases, no pathological change is noted on radiographic examination.5 Metastasis in the jaw can often appear both clinically and radiographically, similarly to those seen in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Clinically, exposed bone is evident (Fig. 6) while radiographically, findings of osteolytic lesions, cortical erosion, bone sclerosis and sequestration, persisting alveolar sockets and pathological fracture have been reported.23 In patients with known metastases being prescribed bone targeting agents who develop MRONJ, it is worth remembering that this could in fact be oral metastases. Such an event is estimated in approximately 5% of patients with MRONJ.24
Secondary care referral
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for suspected head and neck cancer outlines the two-week wait referral pathway to secondary care regarding suspected oral cancer for primary care practitioners.25 An urgent referral, commonly known as a 'two-week wait' should be considered for patients presenting with an unexplained lump in the oral cavity or neck, red and white patches consistent with erythroplakia, erythroleukoplakia or ulceration.25
GDPs should also have a high index of suspicion regarding oral lesions when reviewing patients who have either previously had cancer or are currently undergoing cancer therapy due to the risk of oral metastases. Though oral metastases have a wide spectrum of clinical presentation, the literature demonstrates that dentists are able to confidently recognise abnormalities in the mucosa.26
Management and prognosis
The treatment of metastatic disease primarily depends on the origin and degree of metastatic spread.27 The identification of oral metastatic spread may signify a poor overall prognosis for the patient. Management of the metastatic lesion may include surgical resection, targeted radiation, chemotherapy, bone-targeting medication such as bisphosphonates, or a combination of such techniques.6 If bone-targeting agents or radiation is used, the dental team should be aware of the potential risk of MRONJ and osteoradionecrosis as possible complications from this approach. The oncology team may therefore request a dental assessment before the prescription of these as per the Royal College of Surgeons guidance.28 The dental team should take a holistic approach in such cases and may consider a 'palliative dentistry' approach to match their oncology care,29 especially as the average survival time of a patient with oral metastases is approximately seven months.17 As seen in the literature, oral metastases are secondary to widespread disease, therefore treatment options are limited to the treatment for the primary tumour, with many being palliative in nature. Hence, in order to maintain a functioning dentition for such patients, it is important to take into account the type and stage of malignancy, oncology treatment regime and overall patient prognosis.
In patients with malignancy of poor prognosis such as pancreatic cancer, the focus of the dental practitioner should be on providing dental stability through an approach inclined towards palliative dentistry. Dental stability aims to resolve acute problems when presented and provide appropriate reparative work while the patient is undergoing oncology treatment (Fig. 7) striking a balance of dental health versus treatment burden for an active oncology patient. This allows dental practitioners to tailor patient treatment plans depending on the tumour group and patient prognosis. Those with better prognosis can be prescribed more definitive treatment plans to achieve dental fitness.
Conclusion
Oral metastases comprise 1% of all malignant neoplasms with 90% located in the mandible.6 Primary malignancies such as breast, prostate, lung and kidney can produce oral metastases with most presenting as bone metastases. The clinical presentation of oral metastases can present as dental pain, oral ulceration, oral pain or paraesthesia, thereby making diagnosis challenging. If dentists are suspicious of such lesions, a low threshold should be considered for referral onwards for further assessment and investigation.
This article was originally published in the BDJ in Volume 231 pages 629-633 on 26 November 2021.
References
Cooper G M. The Development and Causes of Cancer. In The Cell: A Molecular Approach 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. 2000.
Servato J, de Paulo L F B, de Faria P R, Cardoso S V, Loyola A M. Metastatic tumours to the head and neck: retrospective analysis from a Brazilian tertiary referral centre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42: 1391-1396.
Hashimoto N, Kurihara K, Yamasaki H, Ohba S, Sakai H, Yoshida S. Pathological characteristics metastatic carcinoma in the human mandible. J Oral Pathol 1987; 16: 362-367.
Kujan O, Sloan P. Dilemmas of oral cancer screening: an update. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14: 3369-3373.
Hirshberg A, Shnaiderman-Shapiro A, Kaplan I, Berger R. Metastatic tumours to the oral cavity pathogenesis and analysis of 673 cases. Oral Oncol 2008; 44: 743-752.
Kumar G, Manjunatha B. Metastatic tumors to the jaws and oral cavity. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2013; 17: 71-75.
Lim S-Y, Kim S-A, Ahn S-G et al. Metastatic tumours to the jaws and oral soft tissues: a retrospective analysis of 41 Korean patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 412-415.
Allon I, Pessing A, Kaplan I, Allon D M, Hirshberg A. Metastatic tumors to the gingiva and the presence of teeth as a contributing factor: a literature analysis. J Periodontol 2014; 85: 132-139.
Shen M-L, Kang J, Wen Y-L et al. Metastatic tumors to the oral and maxillofacial region: a retrospective study of 19 cases in West China and review of the Chinese and English literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 718-737.
Luke C, Koczwara B, Karapetis C et al. Exploring the epidemiological characteristics of cancers of unknown primary site in an Australian population: implications for research and clinical care. Aust N Z J Public Health 2008; 32: 383-389.
Seoane J, Van der Waal I, Van der Waal R I F et al. Metastatic tumours to the oral cavity: A survival study with a special focus on gingival metastases. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 488-492.
Curien R, Moizan H, Gerard E. Gingival metastasis of a bronchogenic adenocarcinoma: Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.021.
D'Silva N, Summerline D-J, Cordell K G et al. Metastatic tumors in the jaws. A retrospective study of 114 cases. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1667-1672.
Clausen F, Poulsen H. Metastatic carcinoma to the jaws. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1963; 57: 361-374.
Coleman R. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 2006; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931.
Brown J E, Cook R J, Major P et al. Bone turnover markers as predictors of skeletal complications in prostate cancer, lung cancer, and other solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 59-69.
Hirshberg A, Berger R, Allon I, Kaplan I. Metastatic Tumors to the Jaws and Mouth. Head Neck Pathol 2014; 8: 463-474.
Hirshberg A, Buchner A. Metastatic tumours to the oral region. An overview. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1995; 31: 355-360.
Anil S, Lal P M, Gill D S, Beena V T. Metastasis of thyroid carcinoma to the mandible. Case report. Aust Dent J 1999; 44: 56-57.
White S, Pharoah M. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby. 2000.
Penarrocha Diago M, Bagan Sebastián J V, Alfaro Giner A, Escrig Orenga V. Mental nerve neuropathy in systemic cancer. Report of three cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69: 48-51.
Gaver A, Polliack G, Pilo R, Hertz M, Kitai E. Orofacial pain and numb chin syndrome as the presenting symptoms of a metastatic prostate cancer. J Postgrad Med 2002; 48: 283-284.
Cardoso C, Barros C, Curra C et al. Radiographic Findings in Patients with Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. Int J Dent 2017; DOI: 10.1155/2017/3190301.
Sacco R, Woolley J, Yates J, Calasans-Maia M D, Akintola O, Patel V. A systematic review of metastatic cancer presenting in osteonecrosis of the jaws (MC-ONJ) in patients undergoing antiresorptive and/or antiangiogenic therapy for skeletal-related adverse events. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021; 131: 650-659.
NICE. Head and neck cancers recognition and referral. 2020. Available at https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/head-neck-cancers-recognition-referral/ (accessed November 2021).
Brocklehurst P, Pemberton M N, Macey R, Cotton C, Walsh T, Lewis M. Comparative accuracy of different members of the dental team in detecting malignant and non-malignant oral lesions. Br Dent J 2015; 218: 525-529.
Sánchez Aniceto G, García Peñín A, de la Mata Pages R, Montalvo Moreno J J. Tumors metastatic to the mandible: analysis of nine cases and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 246-251.
The Royal College of Surgeons of England/The British Society for Disability and Oral Health. The Oral Management of Oncology Patients Requiring Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy and/or Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2018. Available at https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/-/media/files/rcs/fds/publications/rcs-oncology-guideline-update--v36.pdf (accessed November 2021).
Patel V, Patel S, Grossman S, Wali R. The presenting status of solid tumours with bone metastases requiring bone-targeting agents. Part 4: Miscellaneous cancers. Br Dent J 2022; in press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Sarah Jadun: project administration, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing. Lara Zebic: figure construction, writing - review and editing. Vinod Patel: conceptualisation, supervision, validation, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing.
Ethics declarations
There are no conflicts of interest to declare by any of the authors for this submitted work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jadun, S., Zebic, L. & Patel, V. Jaw metastases and the general dental practitioner. BDJ Team 9, 20–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41407-022-0803-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41407-022-0803-4