Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Management of hyperleukocytosis and impact of leukapheresis among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on short- and long-term clinical outcomes: a large, retrospective, multicenter, international study

Abstract

Hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with inferior outcomes. There is limited high quality evidence to support the benefits of leukapheresis. We retrospectively collected data from patients with newly-diagnosed AML who presented with a white cell count (WBC) >50 × 109/L to 12 centers in the United States and Europe from 2006 to 2017 and received intensive chemotherapy. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios for 30-day mortality and achievement of composite complete remission (CRc). Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios for overall survival (OS). Among 779 patients, clinical leukostasis was reported in 27%, and leukapheresis was used in 113 patients (15%). Thirty-day mortality was 16.7% (95% CI: 13.9–19.3%). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 11.5–14.9) among all patients, and 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.7–7.1) among those ≥65 years. Use of leukapheresis did not significantly impact 30-day mortality, achievement of CRc, or OS in multivariate analysis based on available data or in analysis based on multiple imputation. Among patients with investigator-adjudicated clinical leukostasis, there were statistically significant improvements in 30-day mortality and OS with leukapheresis in unadjusted analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Given the significant resource use, cost, and potential complications of leukapheresis, randomized studies are needed to evaluate its value.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overall survival.
Fig. 2: Forest plot of multivariable analysis.
Fig. 3: Forest plot of propensity score-matched multivariate analysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rollig C, Ehninger G. How I treat hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;125:3246–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenwood MJ, Seftel MD, Richardson C, Barbaric D, Barnett MJ, Bruyere H, et al. Leukocyte count as a predictor of death during remission induction in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47:1245–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marbello L, Ricci F, Nosari AM, Turrini M, Nador G, Nichelatti M, et al. Outcome of hyperleukocytic adult acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-center retrospective study and review of literature. Leuk Res. 2008;32:1221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Porcu P, Danielson CF, Orazi A, Heerema NA, Gabig TG, McCarthy LJ. Therapeutic leukapheresis in hyperleucocytic leukaemias: lack of correlation between degree of cytoreduction and early mortality rate. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:433–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Santis GC, de Oliveira LC, Romano LG, Almeida Prado Bde P Jr, Simoes BP, Rego EM, et al. Therapeutic leukapheresis in patients with leukostasis secondary to acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Apher. 2011;26:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Porcu P, Cripe LD, Ng EW, Bhatia S, Danielson CM, Orazi A, et al. Hyperleukocytic leukemias and leukostasis: a review of pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;39:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Burnett AK, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010;115:453–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zuckerman T, Ganzel C, Tallman MS, Rowe JM. How I treat hematologic emergencies in adults with acute leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:1993–2002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruserud O, Liseth K, Stamnesfet S, Cacic DL, Melve G, Kristoffersen E, et al. Hyperleukocytosis and leukocytapheresis in acute leukaemias: experience from a single centre and review of the literature of leukocytapheresis in acute myeloid leukaemia. Transfus Med. 2013;23:397–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bug G, Anargyrou K, Tonn T, Bialleck H, Seifried E, Hoelzer D, et al. Impact of leukapheresis on early death rate in adult acute myeloid leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis. Transfusion. 2007;47:1843–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giles FJ, Shen Y, Kantarjian HM, Korbling MJ, O’Brien S, Anderlini P, et al. Leukapheresis reduces early mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with high white cell counts but does not improve long- term survival. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;42:67–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiebaut A, Thomas X, Belhabri A, Anglaret B, Archimbaud E. Impact of pre-induction therapy leukapheresis on treatment outcome in adult acute myelogenous leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis. Ann Hematol. 2000;79:501–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oberoi S, Lehrnbecher T, Phillips B, Hitzler J, Ethier MC, Beyene J, et al. Leukapheresis and low-dose chemotherapy do not reduce early mortality in acute myeloid leukemia hyperleukocytosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leuk Res. 2014;38:460–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berber I, Kuku I, Erkurt MA, Kaya E, Bag HG, Nizam I, et al. Leukapheresis in acute myeloid leukemia patients with hyperleukocytosis: a single center experience. Transfus Apher Sci. 2015;53:185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi MH, Choe YH, Park Y, Nah H, Kim S, Jeong SH, et al. The effect of therapeutic leukapheresis on early complications and outcomes in patients with acute leukemia and hyperleukocytosis: a propensity score-matched study. Transfusion. 2018;58:208–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang MC, Chen TY, Tang JL, Lan YJ, Chao TY, Chiu CF, et al. Leukapheresis and cranial irradiation in patients with hyperleukocytic acute myeloid leukemia: no impact on early mortality and intracranial hemorrhage. Am J Hematol. 2007;82:976–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Inaba H, Fan Y, Pounds S, Geiger TL, Rubnitz JE, Ribeiro RC, et al. Clinical and biologic features and treatment outcome of children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and hyperleukocytosis. Cancer. 2008;113:522–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stahl M, Pine A, Hendrickson JE, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Stone RM, et al. Beliefs and practice patterns in hyperleukocytosis management in acute myeloid leukemia: a large U.S. web-based survey. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:1–4.

  19. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dohner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129:424–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010;116:354–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Breems DA, Van Putten WL, De Greef GE, Van Zelderen-Bhola SL, Gerssen-Schoorl KB, Mellink CH, et al. Monosomal karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia: a better indicator of poor prognosis than a complex karyotype. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4791–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shallis RM, Stahl M, Wei W, et al. Patterns of care and clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis who do not receive intensive chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2020.1728753 [published online ahead of print, 26 Feb 2020].

  24. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Buchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4642–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buuren Sv, Groothuis-Oudshroon K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–67.

  26. Sorita A, Ahmed A, Starr SR, Thompson KM, Reed DA, Prokop L, et al. Off-hour presentation and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:f7393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kostis WJ, Demissie K, Marcella SW, Shao YH, Wilson AC, Moreyra AE, et al. Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1099–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Janszky I, Ahnve S, Ljung R. Weekend versus weekday admission and stroke outcome in Sweden from 1968 to 2005. Stroke. 2007;38:e94. author reply e95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reeves MJ, Smith E, Fonarow G, Hernandez A, Pan W, Schwamm LH, et al. Off-hour admission and in-hospital stroke case fatality in the get with the guidelines-stroke program. Stroke. 2009;40:569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Daver N, Kantarjian H, Marcucci G, Pierce S, Brandt M, Dinardo C, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia and hyperleucocytosis. Br J Haematol. 2015;168:646–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AZ is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research and is also supported by a NCI’s Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award (CCITLA). Research reported in this publication was in part supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30 CA016359. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We would like to acknowledge all the patients who contributed data for this study, and the Frederick A. DeLuca Foundation for supporting the statistical analyses. MS is supported by the MSKCC Clinical Scholars T32 Program under award number 2T32 CA009512-31.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: MS, RS, WW, and AMZ. Provision of study materials or patients: all authors. Collection and assembly of data: all authors. Data analysis and interpretation: MS, RS, WW, and AMZ. Paper writing: all authors. Paper critical revision: all authors. Final approval of paper: all authors. Accountable for all aspects of the work: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amer M. Zeidan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

MS: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. RMS: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. WW: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. PM: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy and Speakers Bureau. Novartis: Research Funding and Speakers Bureau. EL: No relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. JN: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. VRB: consulting fees: CSL Behring, Agios, Abbvie, Partner therapeutics and Incyte. Research funding: Jazz, Incyte, Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and National Marrow Donor Program. MAS: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. ATF: consulting/advisory board—Celgene, Takeda, Abbvie, Forty seven, NewLink, Trovagene, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Amphivena. Clinical trial funding—Celgene and Agios. HK: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. SL: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. IK: Teva: Speakers Bureau. GJR: AbbVie: Consultancy. Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy. Argenx: Consultancy. Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bayer: Consultancy. Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Celltrion: Consultancy. Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Bayer: Consultancy. Eisai: Consultancy. Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Novartis: Consultancy. Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Orsenix: Consultancy. Otsuka: Consultancy. Eisai: Consultancy. Pfizer: Consultancy. Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Sandoz: Consultancy. Cellectis: Research Funding. Orsenix: Consultancy. TC: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees and Speakers. Bureau. Menarini: Consultancy. Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees and Speakers Bureau. Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees and Speakers Bureau. AbbVie: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees and Speakers Bureau. Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. DMC: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. ER: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. UG: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding and Consultancy. Novartis: Honoraria and Research Funding. Janssen: Honoraria. JMU: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. SM: Aplastic Anemia & MDS International Foundation in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria. BioPharm Communications: Consultancy. Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria and Speakers Bureau. LEK Consulting: Consultancy and Honoraria. Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees and Research Funding. Pfizer: Honoraria. Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria. Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. AMB: Takeda: Research Funding. Celgene: Consultancy and Research Funding. Novartis: Research Funding. AMM: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose CMM: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. EKR: Incyte: Consultancy and Speakers Bureau. Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses and Speakers Bureau. Pfizer: Consultancy and Research Funding. Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding and Speakers Bureau. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. NS Pharma: Research Funding. RRV: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. RI: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. BB: No relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. FR: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. MT: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. EGAC: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. ER: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. BY: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. IC: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. NAP: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy and Honoraria. Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy and Honoraria. Incyte: Consultancy and Honoraria. Novartis: Consultancy and Honoraria. Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding. Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Celator: Research Funding. Pfizer: Research Funding, Consultancy and Honoraria. Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Celgene: Research Funding, Consultancy and Honoraria. Genentech: Research Funding. AI Therapeutics: Research Funding. Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kartos Therapeutics: Research Funding. JPB: no relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose. SDG: Celgene: Consultancy and Research Funding. AMZ received research funding from Celgene, Acceleron, Abbvie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Trovagene, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, Astex, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Trovagene, Takeda, Ionis, and Epizyme. AMZ received travel support for meetings from Pfizer, Novartis, and Trovagene. None of these relationships were related to the development of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stahl, M., Shallis, R.M., Wei, W. et al. Management of hyperleukocytosis and impact of leukapheresis among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on short- and long-term clinical outcomes: a large, retrospective, multicenter, international study. Leukemia 34, 3149–3160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0783-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0783-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links