Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Multiple myeloma gammopathies

Role of AID in the temporal pattern of acquisition of driver mutations in multiple myeloma

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Order of acquisition of mutations in driver gene in multiple myeloma.
Fig. 2: Mutational processes involved in the acquisition of mutations in driver genes.

References

  1. Manier S, Salem KZ, Park J, Landau DA, Getz G, Ghobrial IM. Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:100–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlyn C, Morgan GJ. Evolutionary biology of high-risk multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:543–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lohr JG, Stojanov P, Carter SL, Cruz-Gordillo P, Lawrence MS, Auclair D, et al. Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:91–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maura F, Bolli N, Angelopoulos N, Dawson KJ, Leongamornlert D, Martincorena I, et al. Genomic landscape and chronological reconstruction of driver events in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker BA, Mavrommatis K, Wardell CP, Ashby TC, Bauer M, Davies FE, et al. Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:587–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolli N, Maura F, Minvielle S, Gloznik D, Szalat R, Fullam A, et al. Genomic patterns of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nair S, Sng J, Boddupalli CS, Seckinger A, Chesi M, Fulciniti M, et al. Antigen-mediated regulation in monoclonal gammopathies and myeloma. JCI Insight. 2018;3:98259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rustad EH, Yellapantula V, Bolli N, Leongamornlert D, Nadeu F, Angelopoulous N, et al. Timing the initiation of multiple myeloma. Sneak Peek. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409453

  9. Deshwar AG, Vembu S, Yung CK, Jang GH, Stein L, Morris Q. PhyloWGS: reconstructing subclonal composition and evolution from whole-genome sequencing of tumors. Genome Biol. 2015;16:35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maura F, Degasperi A, Nadeu F, Leongamornlert D, Davies H, Moore L, et al. A practical guide for mutational signature analysis in hematological malignancies. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarez-Prado AF, Perez-Duran P, Perez-Garcia A, Benguria A, Torroja C, de Yebenes VG, et al. A broad atlas of somatic hypermutation allows prediction of activation-induced deaminase targets. J Exp Med. 2018;215:761–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapuy B, Stewart C, Dunford AJ, Kim J, Kamburov A, Redd RA, et al. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes. Nat Med. 2018;24:679–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexandrov L, Kim J, Haradhvala N, Huang M, Ng A, Boot A, et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. 2018. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/322859v2.

  15. Maura F, Petljak M, Lionetti M, Cifola I, Liang W, Pinatel E, et al. Biological and prognostic impact of APOBEC-induced mutations in the spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias and multiple myeloma cell lines. Leukemia. 2018;32:1044–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.345

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center NCI Core Grant (P30 CA 008748). BDG, DH and ML were supported by a Stand Up To Cancer—National Science Foundation—Lustgarten Foundation Convergence Dream Team Grant. BDG and DH were supported by The Pershing Square Sohn Prize-Mark Foundation Fellowship supported by funding from The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research. KHM was supported by the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand New Investigator Clinical Fellowship and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Mike and Carole Ralston Travelling Fellowship

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FM designed the study, collected, analyzed data and wrote the paper; OL, EHR, KHM, BTD and VY analyzed data and wrote the paper; GM, AL, EP, ML and BDG analyzed data

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Maura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maura, F., Rustad, E.H., Yellapantula, V. et al. Role of AID in the temporal pattern of acquisition of driver mutations in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 34, 1476–1480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0689-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0689-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links