Abstract 1850 Poster Session I, Saturday, 5/1 (poster 30)
Physical model studies have indicated that the Aladdin/Infant Flow ® NCPAP device (A-IF) provides more stable volume recruitment (ΔVL) with less imposed WOB compared to conventional NCPAP (CONV) (Klausner et al, Pediatr Pulmonol 1996;22:188-94). However, corroborating infant data are lacking. METHODS: 15 preterm infants with minimal lung disease [(means ± SD) birth weight 1.1 ± 0.24 kg, gestational age 29 ± 1.8 wks, age 13 ± 11 days, FiO2 0.31 ± 0.11, CONV NCPAP 5.6 ± 1cmH20] were studied. A-IF and CONV were applied in random order. We measured ΔVL and tidal ventilation (VT) by DC-coupled/calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) as well as esophageal pressures (Pes) during NCPAP of 8, 6, 4 and 0 cmH20. WOB and lung compliance (CL) were calculated from the Pes and VT data using standard methods. RESULTS: Baseline measurements at NCPAP=0 were assumed to be equivalent for the two devices, and were used for subsequent comparisons of WOB and CL. WOB decreased at all NCPAP levels with A-IF, with a maximal decrease at NCPAP=4 (p=0.04, Fig). WOB increased at all NCPAP levels with CONV. An increase in CL was observed at all NCPAP levels with A-IF, while CL increased only at NCPAP=8 with CONV. When compared to CONV, ΔVL with A-IF was significantly higher at all NCPAP levels
CONCLUSION: WOB is decreased with A-IF compared to CONV. At NCPAP>4, the relative increase in WOB and decrease in CL with A-IF may be explained by lung overdistension. The increase in WOB with CONV at NCPAP 4-8, relative to NCPAP=0, indicates the presence of appreciable imposed WOB with this device. This result, combined with the reduced WOB seen with A-IF, is consistent with the physical model studies. Our study, performed in neonates with little lung disease, indicates the possibility of lung overdistension at NCPAP 6-8 with A-IF. Further study is necessary to determine the efficacy of A-IF, as compared to CONV, in neonates with significant lung disease and as well as its use over extended periods of time.
Supported in part by a grant from Cooper Faculty Practice, Hamilton Medical, and EME Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandit, P., Pyon, K., Courtney, S. et al. Inspiratory Work of Breathing (WOB) with a Demand Flow Vs Constant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) Device in Preterm Neonates. Pediatr Res 45, 314 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199904020-01866
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199904020-01866