Abstract
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is a critical diagnostic tool in urology. Residents require adequate training but resident education could have a deleterious effect on patient comfort and morbidity. We compared pain associated with prostate biopsy when performed by staff versus resident urologists in order to determine the impact of resident training. Male patients scheduled to undergo prostate biopsy were assigned to either a staff urologist or a resident as the primary surgeon. All residents were directly assisted by the staff surgeon. The patients were given a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100 mm) and were asked to assess the pain associated with each component of prostate biopsy, including probe insertion, anesthetic injection and the biopsies themselves. The mean VAS scores for probe insertion, anesthetic injection and biopsies were 31.0, 30.4 and 30.1, respectively, for patients in the staff cohort and 37.1, 28.9 and 33.6, respectively, for those in the resident cohort. There was a statistically significant difference between staff and resident VAS scores, marked by a higher odds of greater pain with ultrasound probe placement (odds ratio (OR)=1.48, P=0.012) and the biopsies themselves (OR=1.52, P=0.01) in the resident cohort. TRUS biopsy can be performed by adequately trained and supervised resident urologists of all levels, but there is the potential for increased patient pain, particularly with ultrasonic probe insertion and obtaining core biopsies. However, the absolute magnitude of the differences in pain scores between residents and staff was small and may not be clinically meaningful. Such data indicate that urological resident training can be accomplished without compromising patient care and comfort.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Siegel YI, Lindner A . The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2001; 165: 445–454.
Nguyen CT, Babineau DC, Jones JS . Impact of urologic resident training on patient pain and morbidity associated with office-based cystoscopy. Urology 2008; 71: 782–786.
Nguyen CT, Hernandez AV, Gao T, Thomas AA, Jones JS . Office based vasectomy can be performed by supervised urological residents with patient pain and morbidity comparable to those of a staff surgeon procedure. J Urol 2008; 180: 1451–1454.
Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD . Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office. J Urol 2002; 168: 2108–2110.
Nguyen CT, Jones JS . Comparison of traditional basal and apical periprostatic block: impact on injection pain and biopsy pain. BJU Int 2007; 99: 575–578.
Lee G, Attar K, Laniado M, Karim O . Trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: nationwide diversity in practice and training in the United Kingdom. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39: 185–188.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, C., Gao, T., Hernandez, A. et al. Can residents perform transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with patient comfort comparable to biopsy performed by attending staff urologists?. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 13, 52–57 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.36
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.36
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
The role of urology and radiology in prostate biopsy: current trends and future perspectives
World Journal of Urology (2024)