Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology volume 12, pages 46–53 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

DNA wrapped in nucleosomes is sterically occluded, creating obstacles for proteins that must bind it. How proteins gain access to DNA buried inside nucleosomes is not known. Here we report measurements of the rates of spontaneous nucleosome conformational changes in which a stretch of DNA transiently unwraps off the histone surface, starting from one end of the nucleosome, and then rewraps. The rates are rapid. Nucleosomal DNA remains fully wrapped for only ∼250 ms before spontaneously unwrapping; unwrapped DNA rewraps within ∼10–50 ms. Spontaneous unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA allows any protein rapid access even to buried stretches of the DNA. Our results explain how remodeling factors can be recruited to particular nucleosomes on a biologically relevant timescale, and they imply that the major impediment to entry of RNA polymerase into a nucleosome is rewrapping of nucleosomal DNA, not unwrapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Mechanism of site exposure in nucleosomes deduced from earlier studies11,14.
Figure 2: Equilibrium titration of nucleosomes with LexA, detected by FRET.
Figure 3: Kinetics of LexA binding to DNA monitored by stopped-flow fluorescence anisotropy.
Figure 4: Equilibrium binding of LexA to DNA.
Figure 5: Stopped-flow FRET analysis of LexA binding to nucleosomes.
Figure 6: Spontaneous nucleosome opening and rewrapping fluctuations detected by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richmond, T. & Widom, J. Nucleosome and chromatin structure. In Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression (eds. Eligin, S.C.R. & Workman, J.L.) (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richmond, T.J. & Davey, C.A. The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core. Nature 423, 145–150 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kornberg, R.D. & Lorch, Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98, 285–294 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Felsenfeld, G. & Groudine, M. Controlling the double helix. Nature 421, 448–453 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Felsenfeld, G. Chromatin unfolds. Cell 86, 13–19 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khorasanizadeh, S. The nucleosome: from genomic organization to genomic regulation. Cell 116, 259–272 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Langst, G. & Becker, P.B. Nucleosome remodeling: one mechanism, many phenomena? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677, 58–63 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Muchardt, C. & Yaniv, M. ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling: SWI/SNF and Co. are on the job. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 187–198 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Narlikar, G.J., Fan, H.Y. & Kingston, R.E. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell 108, 475–487 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson, C.L. & Logie, C. Recruitment of chromatin remodeling machines. J. Cell. Biochem. 78, 179–185 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Polach, K.J. & Widom, J. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 130–149 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, J.D. & Widom, J. Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 296, 979–987 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clegg, R.M. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer and nucleic acids. Methods Enzymol. 211, 353–388 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, G. & Widom, J. Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 763–769 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B. & Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fan, H.Y., He, X., Kingston, R.E. & Narlikar, G.J. Distinct strategies to make nucleosomal DNA accessible. Mol. Cell 11, 1311–1322 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kassabov, S.R., Zhang, B., Persinger, J. & Bartholomew, B. SWI/SNF unwraps, slides, and rewraps the nucleosome. Mol. Cell 11, 391–403 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Protacio, R.U., Polach, K.J. & Widom, J. Coupled-enzymatic assays for the rate and mechanism of DNA site exposure in a nucleosome. J. Mol. Biol. 274, 708–721 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonnet, G., Krichevsky, O. & Libchaber, A. Kinetics of conformational fluctuations in DNA hairpin-loops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8602–8606 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hess, S.T., Huang, S., Heikal, A.A. & Webb, W.W. Biological and chemical applications of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: a review. Biochemistry 41, 697–705 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krichevsky, O. & Bonnet, G. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: the technique and its applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 251–297 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ha, T. et al. Initiation and re-initiation of DNA unwinding by the Escherichia coli Rep helicase. Nature 419, 638–641 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Halford, S.E. & Marko, J.F. How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets? Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3040–3052 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. von Hippel, P.H. & Berg, O.G. Facilitated target location in biological systems. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 675–678 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Owen-Hughes, T. & Workman, J.L. Remodeling the chromatin structure of a nucleosome array by transcription factor-targeted trans-displacement of histones. EMBO J. 15, 4702–4712 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Owen-Hughes, T., Utley, R.T., Cote, J., Peterson, C.L. & Workman, J.L. Persistent site-specific remodeling of a nucleosome array by transient action of the SWI/SNF complex. Science 273, 513–516 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Logie, C. & Peterson, C.L. Catalytic activity of the yeast SWI/SNF complex on reconstituted nucleosome arrays. EMBO J. 16, 6772–6782 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beard, D.A. & Schlick, T. Computational modeling predicts the structure and dynamics of chromatin fiber. Structure 9, 105–114 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Widom, J. Structure, dynamics, and function of chromatin in vitro. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 27, 285–327 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Widom, J. Chromatin structure: linking structure to function with histone H1. Curr. Biol. 8, R788–R791 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Widom, J. Toward a unified model of chromatin folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 18, 365–395 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Escher, D. & Schaffner, W. Gene activation at a distance and telomeric silencing are not affected by yeast histone H1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256, 456–461 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patterton, H.G., Landel, C.C., Landsman, D., Peterson, C.L. & Simpson, R.T. The biochemical and phenotypic characterization of Hho1p, the putative linker histone H1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7268–7276 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Freidkin, I. & Katcoff, D.J. Specific distribution of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone homolog HHO1p in the chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4043–4051 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cloutier, T.E. & Widom, J. Spontaneous sharp bending of double-stranded DNA. Mol. Cell 14, 355–362 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Narlikar, G.J., Phelan, M.L. & Kingston, R.E. Generation and interconversion of multiple distinct nucleosomal states as a mechanism for catalyzing chromatin fluidity. Mol. Cell 8, 1219–1230 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shermoen, A.W. & O'Farrell, P.H. Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts. Cell 67, 303–310 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Thastrom, A., Bingham, L.M. & Widom, J. Nucleosomal locations of dominant DNA sequence motifs for histone-DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 695–709 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Little, J.W. et al. Cleavage of LexA repressor. Methods Enzymol. 244, 266–284 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, B. & Little, J.W. Dimerization of a specific DNA-binding protein on the DNA. Science 255, 203–206 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernasconi, C.F. (ed.). Investigation of rates and mechanisms of reactions. In Techniques of Chemistry 4th edn. Vol. VI (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Widengren, J. & Mets, U. Conceptual basis of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and related techniques as tools in bioscience. In Single Molecule Detection in Solution (eds. Zander, C., Enderlein, J. & Keller, R.A.) 69–120 (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2002).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S. Huang for valuable discussions and comments on the manuscript. We thank J. Little for the LexA expression plasmid, and the Keck Biophysics Facility at Northwestern University for the use of instruments. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants GM54692 and GM58617 to J.W., and by NIH grant GM32543, and US Department of Energy grants DE-AC03-76DF00098, GTL2BN Microscopies of Molecular Machines, and SNANOB Design of Autonomous Nanobots to C.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, 60208-3500, Illinois, USA

    Gu Li & Jonathan Widom

  2. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA

    Marcia Levitus & Carlos Bustamante

  3. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA

    Carlos Bustamante

  4. Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA

    Carlos Bustamante

  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA

    Marcia Levitus & Carlos Bustamante

Authors
  1. Gu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcia Levitus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos Bustamante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonathan Widom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Widom.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Stopped-flow FRET as a function of [LexA]. (PDF 257 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Cooperative nonspecific binding by LexA. (PDF 243 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Stopped-flow FRET at elevated [Na+]. (PDF 138 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Summary of kinetic analyses. (PDF 48 kb)

Supplementary Data (PDF 77 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, G., Levitus, M., Bustamante, C. et al. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12, 46–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb869

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb869

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing