Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Variations on ligand–receptor complexes

The complex between BMP-2, a TGF-β family member, and its high affinity receptor provides new insights into the assembly of receptor complexes for members of the cystine-knot growth factor family. A novel proposal for the interaction between Flt3L and its receptor suggests a general scheme for the interaction of closely related receptor tyrosine kinases with structurally diverse ligands, including certain members of the TGF-β family.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The ‘growth hormone paradigm’.
Figure 2: A novel proposal for receptor engagement of Flt3L2: models of the receptor complexes for Flt3L (left) and VEGF (right).
Figure 3: Three classes of homodimeric cystine-knot growth factors: TGF-β (left), VEGF (middle) and NGF (right).
Figure 4: Similarities and differences in receptor binding by cystine-knot growth factors: receptor complexes of BMP-2 (left), VEGF (middle), and NGF (right).

References

  1. Kirsch, T., Sebald, W., & Dreyer, M.K. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 492–496 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Savvides, S.N., Boone, T. & Karplus, P.A. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 486–491 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazan, J.F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6934–6938 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Vos, A.M., Ultsch, M. & Kossiakoff, A.A. Science 255, 306–312 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rozwarski, D.A. et al. Structure 2, 159–173 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graddis, T.J. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17626–17633 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, P.D. & Davies, D.R. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24, 269–291 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiesmann, C. et al. Cell 91, 695–704 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiesmann, C., Ultsch, M.H., Bass, S.H. & de Vos, A.M. Nature 401, 184–188 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Massague, J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 753–791 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenwald, J., Fischer, W.H., Vale, W.W. & Choe, S. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 18–22 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheufler, C., Sebald, W. & Hulsmeyer, M. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 103–115 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Syed, R.S. et al. Nature 395, 511–516 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M.K. Dreyer and P.A. Karplus for giving us access to their coordinates, and W. Sebald for sharing data prior to publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham M. de Vos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiesmann, C., de Vos, A. Variations on ligand–receptor complexes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 7, 440–442 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/75825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/75825

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing