Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Intracerebral haemorrhage

Prognostic scales versus clinical judgment in ICH

Prognostic scoring systems are widely used as objective outcome predictors in neurocritical care, for example, after haemorrhagic stroke. A new study, however, has unexpectedly shown that clinicians can predict outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage more accurately than do formal scoring scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hwang, D. Y. et al. Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes. Neurology 86, 126–133 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hemphill, J. C. 3rd, Newman, J., Zhao, S. & Johnston, S. C. Hospital usage of early do-not-resuscitate orders and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 35, 1130–1134 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rost, N. S. et al. Prediction of functional outcome in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: the FUNC score. Stroke 39, 2304–2309 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuhrim, S., Horowitz, D. R., Sacher, M. & Godbold, J. H. Volume of ventricular blood is an important determinant of outcome in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit. Care Med. 27, 617–621 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, S. M. et al. Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 66, 1175–1181 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ariesen, M. J., Algra, A., van der Worp, H. B. & Rinkel, G. J. Applicability and relevance of models that predict short term outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76, 839–844 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker, K. J. et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology 56, 766–772 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Claire, J. et al. Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders and prognostic models for intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Crit. Care Med. 39, 158–162 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregson, B. A. et al. Individual patient data subgroup meta-analysis of surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 43, 1496–1504 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vespa, P. M., Martin, N., Zuccarello, M., Awad, I. & Hanley, D. F. Surgical trials in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 44, S79–S82 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel F. Hanley Jr.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanley, D. Prognostic scales versus clinical judgment in ICH. Nat Rev Neurol 12, 192–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.11

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.11

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing