Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

A much needed but imperfect new staging system

A new staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has recently been proposed to standardize the reporting of this intractable disease. However, the system has several flaws; thus, many revisions are needed before a registry can be established that uses this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. DeOliveira, M. L. et al. Proposal for a new staging system and registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology doi:10.1002/hep.24227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 7th edn (eds Sobin, L. H. et al.) (Wiley–Blackwell, Chichester, 2009).

  3. Klatskin, G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am. J. Med. 38, 241–256 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakeeb, A. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann. Surg. 224, 463–473 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebata, T. et al. The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid. Br. J. Surg. 96, 926–934 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seyama, Y. et al. Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann. Surg. 238, 73–83 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bismuth, H. & Corlette, M. B. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 140, 170–178 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bismuth, H., Nakache, R. & Diamond, T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 215, 31–38 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jarnagin, W. R. et al. Staging, respectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 234, 507–519 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagino, M. et al. Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 252, 115–123 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagino, M. A much needed but imperfect new staging system. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8, 252–253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.67

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.67

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing