Key Points
-
New genetic technologies have positioned the field of biological control as a test bed for theories in evolutionary biology and for understanding practical aspects of the release of genetically manipulated material.
-
Purposeful introductions of pathogens, parasites, predators and herbivores, when considered as replicated semi-natural field experiments, show the unpredictable nature of biological colonization.
-
Genetics is now used in biological control in many important ways, including: the development of genetic markers to examine population origins and spread; the isolation of genes that are involved in development, reproduction and behaviour, with much progress from new genomic information; and the development of gene-transfer technology.
-
Evolutionary change associated with organisms that are introduced for biological control has been commonly observed for biological control involving microparasites, such as viruses and bacteria, but not for macroparasites, such as predators and insect parasitoids.
-
Introductions of genotypes in classical biological control can help inform researchers and policy makers as to the risks associated with releasing genetically modified organisms into the environment. Particularly difficult to address in this regard is the potential for evolutionary change.
Abstract
The availability of new genetic technologies has positioned the field of biological control as a test bed for theories in evolutionary biology and for understanding practical aspects of the release of genetically manipulated material. Purposeful introductions of pathogens, parasites, predators and herbivores, when considered as replicated semi-natural field experiments, show the unpredictable nature of biological colonization. The characteristics of organisms and their environments that determine this variation in the establishment and success of biological control can now be explored using genetic tools. Lessons from studies of classical biological control can help inform researchers and policy makers about the risks that are associated with the release of genetically modified organisms, particularly with respect to long-term evolutionary changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eilenberg, J., Hajek, A. & Lomer, C. Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. BioControl 46, 387–400 (2001). A guide to the different types of biological control procedures and their uses.
Garcia, R., Caltagirone, L. E. & Gutierrez, A. P. Comments on a redefinition of biological control. Roundtable. BioScience 38, 692–694 (1988).
Kareiva, P. Contributions of ecology to biological control. Ecology 77, 1963–1964 (1996).
Simberloff, D. & Stiling, P. How risky is biological control? Ecology 77, 1965–1974 (1996). A rigorous assessment of the risks that are associated with biological control, including non-target effects.
Hufbauer, R. A. Evidence for nonadaptive evolution in parasitoid virulence following a biological control introduction. Ecol. Appl. 12, 66–78 (2002). A review of the ecological and evolutionary changes that are associated with biological control.
Hall, R. W. & Ehler, L. E. Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 25, 280–282 (1979).
Van Lenteren, J. C. The potential of entomophagous parasites for pest control. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 10, 143–158 (1983).
Crawley, M. J. The successes and failures of weed biocontrol using insects. Biocontrol News Info. 10, 213–223 (1989).
Lawton, J. H. in Alternative to the Chemical Control of Weeds: Proceedings of an International Conference (eds Bassett, C., Whitehouse, L. J. & Zabkiewicz, J. A.) (Ministry of Forestry, Rotorua, New Zealand, 1990). A food-web approach to assess the trophic relationships that are associated with biological control introductions in Hawaii.
Henneman, M. L. & Memmott, J. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science 293, 1314–1316 (2001).
Louda, S. M., Pemberton, R. W., Johnson, M. T. & Follett, P. A. Nontarget effects — the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48, 365–396 (2003). An examination of non-target effects in 10 case studies of biological control.
Boettner, G. H., Elkinton, J. S. & Boettner, C. J. Effects of a biological control introduction on three nontarget native species of saturniid moths. Conserv. Biol. 14, 1798–1806 (2000).
Howarth, F. G. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36, 485–511 (1991). A highly publicized synthesis of the environmental effects that are associated with classical biological control.
Hoddle, M. S. Is the anti-GMO stance warrented in Australia and New Zealand? Myrmecia May 10–11 (2003).
Unruh, T. R. & Woolley, J. B. in Handbook of Biological Control (eds Bellows, T. S. & Fisher, T. W.) 57–85 (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1999).
Ehler, L. E., Sforza, R. & Mateille, T. (eds.) Genetics, Evolution, and Biological Control 288 (CABI, New York, in the press). An up-to-date review of genetics and evolutionary biology as applied to biological control.
Ashburner, M., Hoy, M. A. & Peloquin, J. J. Prospects for the genetic transformation of arthropods. Insect Mol. Biol. 7, 201–213 (1998).
Navajas, M., Lagnel, J., Gutierrez, J. & Boursot, P. Species wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism. Heredity 80, 742–752 (1998).
Roderick, G. K. in Genetics, Evolution, and Biological Control (ed. Mateille, T.) (CABI, New York, in the press).
Waage, J. in Critical Issues in Biological Control (eds Mackauer, M., Ehler, L. E. & Roland, J.) 135–157 (Intercept, Andover, United Kingdom, 1990).
Slatkin, M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236, 787–792 (1987).
Roderick, G. K. Geographic structure of insect populations: gene flow, phylogeography, and their uses. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41, 263–290 (1996).
Holder, M. & Lewis, P. O. Phylogeny estimation: traditional and bayesian approaches. Nature Rev. Genetics 4, 275–284 (2003).
Rosenberg, N. A. & Nordborg, M. Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nature Rev. Genetics 3, 380–390 (2002).
Lanciotti, R. S. et al. Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science 286, 2333–2337 (1999).
Gaskin, J. F. & Schaal, B. A. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11256–11259 (2002).
Estoup, A., Wilson, I. J., Sullivan, C., Cornuet, J. M. & Moritz, C. Inferring population history from microsatellite and enzyme data in serially introduced cane toads, Bufo marinus. Genetics 159, 1671–1687 (2001).
Davies, N., Villablanca, F. X. & Roderick, G. K. Determining the sources of individuals in recently founded populations: multilocus genotyping in non-equilibrium genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 17–21 (1999).
Cornuet, J. M. & Luikart, G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144, 2001–2014 (1996).
Hufbauer, R. A., Bogdanowicz, S. M. & Harrison, R. G. The population genetics of a biological control introduction: mtDNA and microsatellite variation in native and introduced populations of Aphidius ervi, a parasitoid wasp. Mol. Ecol. (in the press).
Cornuet, J. M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Estoup, A. & Solignac, M. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153, 1989–2000 (1999).
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).
Rannala, B. & Mountain, J. L. Detecting immigration using multilocus genotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9197–9201 (1997).
Navajas, M. et al. Field releases of the predatory mite Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Canada, monitored by pyrethroid resistance and allozyme markers. Biol. Control 20, 191–198 (2001).
Bohonak, A. J., Davies, N., Villablanca, F. X. & Roderick, G. K. Invasion genetics of New World medflies: testing alternative colonization scenarios. Biol. Invasions 3, 103–111 (2001).
Beerli, P. & Felsenstein, J. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4563–4568 (2001).
Nielsen, R. & Wakeley, J. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158, 885–896 (2001).
Navajas, M. et al. Genetic structure of the greenhouse population of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae: spatio-temporal analysis with microsatellite markers. Insect Mol. Biol. 11, 157–165 (2002).
Storz, J. F. & Beaumont, M. A. Testing for genetic evidence of population expansion and contraction: an empirical analysis of microsatellite DNA variation using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Evolution 56, 154–166 (2002).
Roush, R. T. & Hopper, K. R. Use of single-family lines to preserve genetic-variation in laboratory colonies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88, 713–717 (1995).
Hopper, K. R., Roush, R. T. & Powell, W. Management of genetics of biological control introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 38, 27–51 (1993).
Perez-Maluf, R., Kaiser, L. & Wajnberg, E. Genetic variability of conditioned probing responses to a fruit odor in Leptopilina boulardi (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae), a Drosophila parasitoid. Behav. Genet. 28, 67–73 (1998).
Bidochka, M. J. et al. Fate of biological control introductions: monitoring an Australian fungal pathogen of grasshoppers in North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 93, 918–921 (1996).
Handler, A. M. & Beeman, R. W. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service: advances in the molecular genetic analysis of insects and their application to pest management. Pest Manag. Sci. 59, 728–735 (2003). A summary of the ways in which molecular genetic approaches are used in pest management.
Whitten, M. J. & Hoy, M. in Handbook of Biological Control (eds Bellows, T. S. & Fisher, T. W.) 271–296 (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1999).
Ding, X. et al. Insect resistance of transgenic tobacco expressing an insect chitinase gene. Transgenic Res. 7, 77–84 (1998).
Federici, B. A. in Handbook of Biological Control (eds Bellows, T. S. & Fisher, T. W.) 575–593 (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1999).
Hilbeck, A. Implications of transgenic, insecticidal plants for insect and plant biodiversity. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 4, 43–61 (2001).
Possee, R. D., Barnett, A. L., Hawtin, R. E. & King, L. A. Engineered baculoviruses for pest control. Pestic. Sci. 51, 462–470 (1997).
Holloway, A. J., Van Laar, R. K., Tothill, R. W. & Bowtell, D. D. L. Options available — from start to finish — for obtaining data from DNA microarrays. Nature Genet. 32 (Suppl.), 481–489 (2002).
Hui, D. et al. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata: V. Microarray analysis and further characterization of large-scale changes in herbivore-induced mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 131, 1877–1893 (2003).
Sinkins, S. P., Curtis, C. F. & O'Neill, S. L. in Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction (eds O'Neill, S. L., Hoffmann, A. A. & Werren, J. H.) 155–208 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1997).
Stouthamer, R. in Genetics, Evolution, and Biological Control (eds. Ehler, L. E., Sforza, R. & Mateille, T.) 235–252 (CABI, New York, in the press).
Holt, R. D. & Hochberg, M. E. When is biological control evolutionarily stable (or is it)? Ecology 78, 1673–1683 (1997).
Fenner, F. Biological control as exemplified by small pox eradication and myxomatosis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 218, 259–285 (1983).
Fenner, F. Adventures with poxviruses of vertebrates. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24, 123–133 (2000).
Best, S. M., Collins, S. V. & Kerr, P. J. Coevolution of host and virus: cellular localization of virus in myxoma virus infection of resistant and susceptible European rabbits. Virology 277, 76–91 (2000).
Zúñiga, M. C. A pox on thee! Manipulation of the host immune system by myxoma virus and implications for viral–host co-adaptation. Virus Res. 88, 17–33 (2002). An update outlining the present understanding of the genetic mechanisms that are associated with myxoma/rabbit co-evolution.
Thompson, J. N. Evolutionary ecology and the conservation of biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 300–303 (1996).
van Lenteren, J. C. et al. Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control. Biocontrol 48, 3–38 (2003).
Hajek, A. E., Humber, R. A. & Elkinton, J. S. Mysterious origins of Entomophaga maimaiga in North America. Am. Entomolog. 41, 31–42 (1995).
Amarger, N. Genetically modified bacteria in agriculture. Biochimie 84, 1061–1072 (2002).
van Klinken, R. D. & Edwards, O. R. Is host-specificity of weed biological control agents likely to evolve rapidly following establishment? Ecol. Lett. 5, 590–596 (2002).
Willis, A. J., Memmott, J. & Forrester, R. I. Is there evidence for the post-invasion evolution of increased size among invasive plant species? Ecol. Lett. 3, 275–283 (2000).
Cromartie, W. J. Is adaptation after release necessary for successful classical biological control? Entomol. News 108, 252, 258, 304 (1997).
Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5948–5953 (2000). An elegant study of the effects of reduced genetic diversity, which led to changes in behaviour that were associated with the invasion biology of Argentine ants.
De Jong, D. D., Morse, R. A. & Eickwort, G. C. Mite pests of honey bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27, 229–252 (1982).
Anderson, D. L. & Trueman, J. W. H. Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) is more than one species. Exp. App. Acarol. 24, 165–189 (2000).
Elzen, P. J., Eischen, F. A., Baxter, J. R., Elzen, G. W. & Wilson, W. T. Detection of resistance in US Varroa jacobsoni Oud. (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) to the acaricide fluvalinate. Apidologie 30, 13–17 (1999).
Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29, 1–10 (1975).
Luikart, G. & Cornuet, J. M. Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conserv. Biol. 12, 228–237 (1998).
Stouthamer, R. & Kazmer, D. J. Cytogenetics of microbe-associated parthenogenesis and its consequences for gene flow in Trichogramma wasps. Heredity 73, 317–327 (1994).
Dres, M. & Mallet, J. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 471–492 (2002).
Farrell, B. D. “Inordinate fondness” explained: why are there so many beetles? Science 281, 555–559 (1998).
Berlocher, S. H. & Feder, J. L. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29, 403–433 (2002).
Zimmerman, E. C. Possible evidence of rapid evolution in Hawaiian moths. Evolution 14, 137–138 (1960).
Gillespie, R. G. & Roderick, G. K. Arthropods on islands: colonization, speciation, and conservation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 595–632 (2002).
Sorci, G., Moller, A. P. & Boulinier, T. Genetics of host–parasite interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 196–200 (1997).
Thompson, J. N. The Coevolutionary Process (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
Tuda, M. & Bonsall, M. B. Evolutionary and population dynamics of host–parasitoid interactions. Res. Popul. Ecol. 41, 81–91 (1999).
Morin, S. et al. Three cadherin alleles associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in pink bollworm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5004–5009 (2003).
Genissel, A. et al. Initial frequency of alleles conferring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis poplar in a field population of Chrysomela tremulae. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 791–797 (2003).
Hufbauer, R. A. Pea aphid–parasitoid interactions: have parasitoids adapted to differential resistance? Ecology 82, 717–725 (2001).
Hufbauer, R. A. & Via, S. Evolution of an aphid–parasitoid interaction: variation in resistance to parasitism among aphid populations specialized on different plants. Evolution 53, 1435–1445 (1999).
Vaughn, T. T. & Antolin, M. F. Population genetics of an opportunistic parasitoid in an agricultural landscape. Heredity 80, 152–162 (1998).
Kraaijeveld, A. R. & Godfray, H. C. J. Geographic patterns in the evolution of resistance and virulence in Drosophila and its parasitoids. Am. Nat. 153, 61–74 (1999).
Lapchin, L. Host–parasitoid association and diffuse coevolution: when to be a generalist? Am. Nat. 160, 245–254 (2002).
Baker, D. A. The significance of host specialization in the parasitoid wasp, 'Diaeretiella rapae' (M'Intosh). Thesis, Univ. of Western Australia (2002).
O'Neill, S. L., Hoffmann, A. A. & Werren, J. H. (eds). Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1997).
Hokkanen, H. M. T. & Pimentel, D. New associations in biological control: theory and practice. Can. Entomol. 121, 829–840 (1989).
Neuhauser, C. et al. Community genetics: expanding the synthesis of ecology and genetics. Ecology 84, 545–558 (2003).
Ricklefs, R. E. Genetics, evolution, and ecological communities. Ecology 84, 588–591 (2003).
Palumbi, S. R. Evolution — humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Science 293, 1786–1790 (2001). A review that documents the role of evolution in human civilization.
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48, 607–615 (1998).
Pimentel, D., Lack, L., Suniga, R. & Morrison, D. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50, 53–65 (2000).
Hoy, M. A. Transgenic arthropods for pest management programs: risks and realities. Exp. App. Acarol. 24, 463–495 (2000).
Soboleva, T. K., Shorten, P. R., Pleasants, A. B. & Rae, A. L. Qualitative theory of the spread of a new gene into a resident population. Ecol. Modell. 163, 33–44 (2003).
Richards, A., Matthews, M. & Christian, P. Ecological considerations for the environmental impact evaluation of recombinant baculovirus insecticides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43, 493–517 (1998).
Jung, C. & Croft, B. A. Aerial dispersal of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae): estimating falling speed and dispersal distance of adult females. Oikos 94, 182–190 (2001).
Pearson, D. E. & Callaway, R. M. Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 456–461 (2003).
Dushoff, J. & Dwyer, G. Evaluating the risks of engineered viruses: modeling pathogen competition. Ecol. Appl. 11, 1602–1609 (2001).
Li, J. & Hoy, M. A. Adaptability and efficacy of transgenic and wild-type Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) compared as part of a risk assessment. Exp. App. Acarol. 20, 563–573 (1996).
Capalbo, D. M. F. et al. Brazil and the development of international scientific biosafety testing guidelines for transgenic crops. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 83, 104–106 (2003).
Hoddle, M. in Encyclopedia of Insects (eds Resh, V. H. & Cardé, R.) (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 2003).
Ravesberg, W. J. in Advances in Insect Rearing for Research and Pest Management (eds Anderson, T. E. & Leppla, N. C.) 465–487 (Westview, Boulder, Colorado, 1992).
Whitlock, M. C. & McCauley, D. E. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST not equal to 1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 82, 117–125 (1999).
Dwyer, G., Levin, S. A. & Buttel, L. A simulation-model of the population-dynamics and evolution of myxomatosis. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 423–447 (1990).
Acknowledgements
We thank R. Gillespie, R. Hufbauer, O. Edwards, B. Croft, M. Hoddle, L. Smith and three anonymous reviewers for valuable insights and suggestions. This work is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the United States Department of Agriculture, the California Department of Food and Agriculture, the University of California and the French Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Related links
Related links
DATABASES
SwissProt
FURTHER INFORMATION
Berkeley Natural History Museums
Biological control: a guide to natural enemies in North America
French Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique in Montpellier
International Organisation for Biological Control (IOBC)
University of California Berkeley's Gump South Pacific Research Station in Moorea, French Polynesia
Glossary
- HOSTS
-
Prey for organisms that are introduced for biological control.
- ADAPTATION
-
Evolution as a result of selection.
- SOURCE POPULATION
-
Ancestral population; the pest might have descended from this population recently or many generations in the past.
- GENETIC DRIFT
-
The random change in allele frequencies.
- MIGRATION–DRIFT GENETIC EQUILIBRIUM
-
The balance between the loss of alleles through genetic drift and the gain of alleles through migration.
- PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC APPROACH
-
The use of estimated gene genealogies to study the geographical history and structure of populations or species.
- MULTI-LOCUS GENETIC APPROACHES
-
Genetic methods that make use of information from many loci; such approaches use nuclear loci because mitochondrial genes are typically inherited as one locus.
- ASSIGNMENT TESTS
-
Statistical procedures in which individuals can be assigned to probable source populations.
- CO-DOMINANT MARKERS
-
Genetic markers that allow the determination of both alleles at a diploid locus (for example, microsatellites, allozymes and single nucleotide polymorphisms); these differ from dominant markers in which the determination of heterozygotes is not always possible (or example, RAPDs and AFLPs).
- MICROSATELLITES
-
Co-dominant nuclear DNA markers that consist of sets of repeated short nucleotide sequences.
- ALLOZYMES
-
Co-dominant nuclear DNA markers that consist of enzymes that differ in their mobility on a charged gel.
- MARKOV-CHAIN MONTE CARLO
-
A computational technique for the efficient numerical calculation of likelihoods.
- BAYESIAN APPROACH
-
A statistical perspective that focuses on the probability distribution of parameters before and after observing the data.
- EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE
-
The population size that responds identically to that modelled genetically; that is, the size of the population that matters for genetic concerns.
- DIAPAUSE
-
A resting stage for insects, typically during winter or dry periods.
- MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD
-
A procedure in phylogenetic reconstruction in which a tree is chosen that maximizes the probability of the data given the model and the tree hypothesis.
- PARSIMONY
-
A procedure in phylogenetic reconstruction in which a tree is chosen because it requires the fewest possible mutations to explain the data.
- NESTED CLADE ANALYSIS
-
A statistical parsimony procedure that constructs sets of nested clades. With knowledge of geographic distribution, the clades can be examined for evidence of processes that are associated with geographic structure, such as isolation by distance, allopatric fragmentation and long-distance colonization.
- AUTOCIDAL CONTROL
-
The introduction of an organism that causes its own population to decline without interaction with other species.
- PARASITOID
-
An insect that kills only one host individual in its lifetime and has a free-living adult stage; this differs from a predator, which kills many host individuals in its lifetime, and from a parasite, which typically does not kill the host and can persist for several generations in one host.
- SERPINS
-
Irreversible inhibitors of serine proteases that regulate a diverse array of physiological processes, including apoptosis, inflammation, angiogenesis, complement activation, fibrinolysis and coagulation.
- EPIZOOTICS
-
Outbreaks of organisms that feed on other organisms.
- VIRULENCE GRADES
-
Categories of virus virulence that are based on host (rabbit) survival (measured in days) and case mortality (expressed as a percentage).
- FUNDAMENTAL HOST RANGE
-
The actual host range of a species before any evolutionary change.
- COMMON GARDEN EXPERIMENTS
-
Ecological transplant studies in which organisms are reared under identical conditons.
- APICULTURE
-
The practice of bee domestication.
- HAPLOTYPE
-
The allelic configuration of multiple genetic markers that is present on a single chromosome of a given individual.
- MICROBE-ASSOCIATED PARTHENOGENESIS
-
The occurrence of reproduction without males, which is caused by the presence of a microbe.
- SYMPATRIC SPECIATION
-
Genetic divergence that leads to species formation in the same habitat.
- KEYSTONE SPECIES
-
Species in ecological communities that have disproportional direct and indirect effects on other species, which are usually regulated through top-down processes, such as predation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roderick, G., Navajas, M. Genes in new environments: genetics and evolution in biological control. Nat Rev Genet 4, 889–899 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1201
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1201
This article is cited by
-
Tracing the dispersal route of the invasive Japanese beetle Popillia japonica
Journal of Pest Science (2024)
-
Genetics reveals shifts in reproductive behaviour of the invasive bird parasite Philornis downsi collected from Darwin’s finch nests
Biological Invasions (2023)
-
Global invasion history of the emerging plant pathogen Phytophthora multivora
BMC Genomics (2022)
-
What can genetics tell us about the history of a human-mediated introduction of the golden-striped salamander south of its native range?
European Journal of Wildlife Research (2022)
-
High Genetic Diversity and Gene Flow Detected in Populations of Bombus morio from South Brazil
Neotropical Entomology (2022)