Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Breast cancer

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab treatment—signal or noise?

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab, when added to standard chemotherapy for operable breast cancer, improved the rate of complete pathological response in two large, well-conducted trials. However, the modest incremental benefits, combined with uncertain long-term effects on disease recurrence, mean that this approach remains experimental until follow-up data are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0621. Proposal to withdraw approval for the breast cancer indication for AVASTIN (bevacizumab). Decision of the Commissioner [online], (2011).

  2. Ocaña, A., Amir, E., Vera, F., Eisenhauer, E. A. & Tannock, I. F. Addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for treatment of solid tumors: similar results but different conclusions. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 254–256 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bear, H. D. et al. Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 310–320 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. von Minckwitz, G. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 299–309 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. von Minckwitz, G. et al. Impact of treatment characteristics on response of difference breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 125, 145–156 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuerer, H. M. et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 460–469 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bear, H. D. et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 2019–2027 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gralow, J. R. et al. Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 814–819 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chia, S. K. Don't pick the loser: lessons from the GeparQuinto trial. Lancet Oncol. 13, 112–113 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burstein, H. Neoadjuvant bevacizumab treatment—signal or noise?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9, 191–192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.34

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.34

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer