Abstract
Non-linear models with heteroscedasticity are commonly used in ecological and forestry modeling, and logarithmic regression and weighted regression are usually employed to estimate the parameters. Using the single-tree biomass data of three large samples, the bias correction in logarithmic regression for non-linear models was studied and comparison between logarithmic regression and weighted regression was discussed in this paper. Firstly, the imminent cause producing bias in logarithmic regression was analyzed, and a new correction factor was presented with which three commonly used bias correction factors were examined together, and the results showed that the correction factors presented here and derived by Baskerville (1972) should be recommended, which could insure the corrected model to be asymptotically consistent with that fitted by weighted regression. Secondly, the fitting results of weighted regression for non-linear models, using the weight function based on residual errors of the model estimated by ordinary least squares (OLS) and the general weight function (w=1/ƒ(x)2) presented by Zeng (1998) respectively, were compared with each other that showed two weight functions worked well and the general function was more applicable. It was suggested that the best way to fit non-linear models with heteroscedasticity would be using weighted regression, and if the total relative error of the estimates from the model fitted by the general weight function was more than a special allowance such as ±3%, a better weight function based on residual errors of the model fitted by OLS should be used in weighted regression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, W., Tang, S. Bias Correction in Logarithmic Regression and Comparison with Weighted Regression for Nonlinear Models. Nat Prec (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6708.1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6708.1
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Remember to Correct the Bias When Using Deep Learning for Regression!
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz (2023)
-
Additive predictions of aboveground stand biomass in commercial logs and harvest residues for rotation age Pinus radiata plantations in New South Wales, Australia
Journal of Forestry Research (2021)
-
Modelling and quantifying tree biometric properties of dry Afromontane forests of south-central Ethiopia
Trees (2020)
-
Developing individual tree-based models for estimating aboveground biomass of five key coniferous species in China
Journal of Forestry Research (2018)
-
Individual tree biomass equations and growth models sensitive to climate variables for Larix spp. in China
European Journal of Forest Research (2017)