Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Spine motility with synaptic contact

Abstract

Dendritic protrusions, including filopodia and spines, are highly dynamic1,2,3, but the extent to which their motility depends on afferent innervation or synaptic activity is under debate2,3,4,5,6,7,8. By monitoring dendritic spines of labeled Purkinje cells in cerebellar slices by two-photon microscopy, followed by ultrastructural analysis of the same imaged spines, we show that dendritic spines can exhibit morphological rearrangements even when they are contacted by presynaptic terminals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Dendritic spines on Purkinje cells in long-term cerebellar slices are motile.
Figure 2: Reconstruction of an imaged dendrite by electron microscopy.
Figure 3: Spine motility and synaptic contact.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Knutti, D. & Matus, A. Neuron 20, 847–854 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunaevsky, A., Tashiro, A., Majewska, A., Mason, C. & Yuste, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13438–13443 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong, W. T., Faulkner-Jones, B. E., Sanes, J. R. & Wong, R. O. L. J. Neurosci. 20, 5024–5036 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Engert, F. & Bonhoeffer, T. Nature 399, 66–70 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R. & Svoboda, K. Science 283, 1923–1927 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lendvai, B., Stern, E., Chen, B. & Svoboda, K. Nature 404, 876–881 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Wagner, U., Brinkhaus, H. & Matus, A. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 887–894 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, G., Deisseroth, K. & Tsien, R. W. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 151–158 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiala, J. C., Feinberg, M., Popov, V. & Harris, M. J. Neurosci. 18, 8900–8911 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ziv, N. E. & Smith, S. J. Neuron 17, 91–102 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Majewska, A., Tashiro, A. & Yuste, R. J. Neurosci. 20, 8262–8268 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada. K et al. J. Comp. Neurol. 28, 106–120 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bravin, M., Morando, L., Vercelli, A., Rossi, F. & Strata, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1704–1709 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Korkotian, E. & Segal, M. J. Neurosci. (in press).

  15. Majewska, A., Yiu, G. & Yuste, R. Pflügers Arch. 441, 398–408 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Dölen and A. Majewska for their assistance. This work was supported by NIH grants NRSA NS10370 (A.D.), RO1 NS16951 (C.A.M.) and RO1 EY13237 (R.Y.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Dunaevsky.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunaevsky, A., Blazeski, R., Yuste, R. et al. Spine motility with synaptic contact. Nat Neurosci 4, 685–686 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/89460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/89460

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing