This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Frank I et al. (2005) Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort. J Urol 173: 1889–1892
Chawla SN et al. (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175: 425–431
Crispen PL et al.: Delayed intervention of small sporadic renal masses undergoing active surveillance. Cancer, in press
Kunkle DA et al.: Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma. J Urol, in press
Weight CJ et al. (2007) MRI is inadequate for monitoring renal tumor destruction following radiofrequency abloation [abstract #497]. J Urol 177
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Murphy, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uzzo, R. Is CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation oncologically effective in patients with renal cell carcinoma?. Nat Rev Urol 5, 18–19 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0975
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0975