This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Katz R et al. (2003) Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J Urol 169: 2049–2052
Rassweiler J et al. (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169: 1689–1693
Wieder JA and Soloway MS (1998) Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 160: 299–315
Eastham JA et al. (2003) Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 170: 2292–2295
Touijer K et al. (2006) Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49: 853–858
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Sandra Ford, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guillonneau, B. Can TRUS guidance reduce the incidence of positive margins during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?. Nat Rev Urol 3, 518–519 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0580
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0580