Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of pediatric cancer patients

Nature Clinical Practice Oncology volume 2, pages 211–217 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a novel form of radiotherapy, which has the potential to reduce the amount of radiation unintentionally delivered to normal tissues while maintaining a high radiation dose to the tumor in comparison with standard radiation techniques. In adults, this technology has been implemented in a number of tumor sites, but in children it has been little used. This article will review the current studies in which IMRT has been used in children. It will also discuss possible future applications for IMRT, and anticipated problems with its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor RE (1996) Cancer in children: radiotherapeutic approaches. Br Med Bull 52: 873–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Teh BS et al. (2002) Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) decreases treatment-related morbidity and potentially enhances tumor control. Cancer Invest 20: 437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor RE (2003) Proton radiotherapy for paediatric tumors: potential areas for clinical research. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 15: S32–S36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jannoun L and Bloom HJ (1990) Long-term psychological effects in children treated for intracranial tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18: 747–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Willman KY et al. (1994) Radiation induced height impairment in pediatric Hodgkin's disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 28: 85–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith GR et al. (1998) Long-term renal function in patients with irradiated bilateral Wilms tumor: National Wilms' Tumor Study Group. Am J Clin Oncol 21: 58–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ludin A and Macklis RM (2000) Radiotherapy for pediatric genitourinary tumors. Its role and long-term consequences. Urol Clin of North Am 27: 553–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paulino AC and Skwarchuk M (2002) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of children. Med Dosim 27: 115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang E et al. (2002) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: early report on the reduction of ototoxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52: 599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuppersmith RB et al. (2000) The use of intensity modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of extensive and recurrent juvenile angiofibroma. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 52: 261–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cummings BJ et al. (1984) Primary radiation therapy for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Laryngoscope 94: 1599–1605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Milanovic D et al. (2004) Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of head and neck tumors. Increased biological effectiveness in high-risk situations by “integrated boost” therapy. HNO 52: 729–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pickett B et al. (1999) Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44: 921–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Ghazi M et al. (2001) The University of California, Irvine experience with tomotherapy using the Peacock system. Med Dosim 26: 17–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cozzi L et al. (2004) Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58: 617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Milker-Zabel S et al. (2003) Clinical results of retreatment of vertebral bone metastases by stereotactic conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55: 162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Butler EB et al. (1999) Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45: 21–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukunaga-Johnson N et al. (1998) Patterns of failure following treatment for medulloblastoma: is it necessary to treat the entire posterior fossa? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42: 143–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. [no author] (online 1991) ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practioners [http://www.icrp.org/docs/Rad_for_GP_for_web.pdf] (accessed 26 July 2004)

  20. Followill D et al. (1997) Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensity modulated conformal therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38: 667–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grant W III (1996) Experience with intensity modulated beam delivery. In: Teletherapy: Present and Future, 793–803 (Eds Palta J and Mackie TR) Madison: Advanced Medical Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mutic S et al. (2001) Room shielding for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment facilities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50: 239–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koshy M et al. (2004) Extra-target doses in children receiving multileaf collimator (MLC) based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Pediatr Blood Cancer 42: 626–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slosarek K et al. (2004) Pitfalls in IMRT treatment planning with the CadPlan–Helios system. Med Dosim 29: 179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saw CB et al. (2001) Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Med Dosim 26: 71–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Keidan I et al. (2004) Children undergoing repeated exposures for radiation therapy do not develop tolerance to propofol: clinical and bispectral index data. Anesthesiology 100: 251–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seiler G et al. (2001) Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of repeated sedations for the radiotherapy of young children with cancer: a prospective study of 1033 consecutive sedations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49: 771–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scheiber G et al. (1996) Deep sedation with propofol in preschool children undergoing radiation therapy. Paediatr Anaesth 6: 209–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fortney JT et al. (1999) Anesthesia for pediatric external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44: 587–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. St Clair WH et al. (2004) Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58: 727–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swift P (2002) Novel techniques in the delivery of radiation in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Clin North Am 49: 1107–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Krasin MJ et al. (2004) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for children with intraocular retinoblastoma: potential sparing of the bony orbit. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 16: 215–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This review was compiled as part of an IMRT fellowship at the Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. staff physician in the Radiation Oncology Department at the Center of Oncology, MSC Cancer Institute, Gliwice, Poland

    Agata Rembielak

  2. Senior Research Fellow at the Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia

    Tony Choon Seng Woo

Authors
  1. Agata Rembielak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tony Choon Seng Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agata Rembielak.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rembielak, A., Woo, T. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of pediatric cancer patients. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2, 211–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0139

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing