Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

Microarrays and transcriptome analysis in renal transplantation

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Racusen LC et al. (1999) The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 55: 713–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Furness PN et al. (2003) International variation in histologic grading is large, and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility. Am J Surg Pathol 27: 805–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Somorjai RL et al. (2003) Class prediction and discovery using gene microarray and proteomics mass spectroscopy data: curses, caveats, cautions. Bioinformatics 19: 1484–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michiels S et al. (2005) Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 365: 488–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Einecke G et al. (2005) Expression of CTL associated transcripts precedes the development of tubulitis in T-cell mediated kidney graft rejection. Am J Transplant 5: 1827–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Akalin E et al. (2001) Gene expression analysis in human renal allograft biopsy samples using high-density oligoarray technology. Transplantation 72: 948–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarwal M et al. (2003) Molecular heterogeneity in acute renal allograft rejection identified by DNA microarray profiling. N Engl J Med 349: 125–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansfield ES and Sarwal MM (2004) Arraying the orchestration of allograft pathology. Am J Transplant 4: 853–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flechner SM et al. (2004) Kidney transplant rejection and tissue injury by gene profiling of biopsies and peripheral blood lymphocytes. Am J Transplant 4: 1475–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flechner SM et al. (2004) De novo kidney transplantation without use of calcineurin inhibitors preserves renal structure and function at two years. Am J Transplant 4: 1776–1785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim TH et al. (2005) A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436: 876–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip F Halloran.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halloran, P., Einecke, G. Microarrays and transcriptome analysis in renal transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2, 2–3 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0066

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing