Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Is meta-analysis a suitable tool for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dachman AH and Zalis ME (2004) Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 230: 319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Halligan S et al. (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237: 893–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrucci J et al. (2004) Virtual colonoscopy. JAMA 292: 431–432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doshi T et al. (2007) Retrospective analysis of sources of error in a large CTC clinical trial. Radiology 244: 165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pickhardt PJ et al. (2006) Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 241: 417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dachman, A. Is meta-analysis a suitable tool for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5, 10–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0984

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0984

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing