Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Catheter-based stem cell and gene therapy for refractory myocardial ischemia

Abstract

Intramyocardial delivery of genes and cells derived from bone marrow has been evaluated in several small studies of 'no-option' symptomatic patients with chronic ischemic coronary artery disease. Clinical experience with intramyocardial gene delivery is limited to genes encoding isoforms of vascular endothelial cell growth factor. In the largest study (Euroinject One), 80 patients were randomized to receive a plasmid encoding vascular endothelial cell growth factor 165 or placebo. The results of this study suggested no beneficial therapeutic effect of this strategy. The experience with stem cells is limited to use of autologous, nonexpanded, nonmanipulated bone-marrow-derived cells; thus, the number of injected stem cells reflects their natural proportion within the bone marrow. The results of these preliminary studies suggest this approach is feasible and has a high safety profile. Although no conclusion can yet be made regarding efficacy, the improved myocardial perfusion in all four studies described in this Review is encouraging. Data from assessments of individual patients, however, suggests a wide variability in response, underscoring the need for further bench and clinical investigations.

Key Points

  • Catheter-based transendocardial cell and gene delivery for therapeutic angiogenesis has so far been studied in only a small number of patients

  • Studies have so far involved only autologous, nonexpanded, nonmanipulated bone-marrow-derived cells and gene encoding vascular endothelial growth factor

  • Nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping-guided myocardial navigation can help locate the most vulnerable ischemic territory

  • Although some complications have been reported, overall, transendocardial injection seems to be safe

  • No predictors of a favorable response to therapy have yet been clearly identified

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thom T et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. (2006) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 113: e85–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mukherjee D et al. (1999) Direct myocardial revascularization and angiogenesis—how many patients might be eligible? Am J Cardiol 84: 598–600, A8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Henry TD et al. for the VIVA Investigators* (2003) The VIVA Trial: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis. Circulation 107: 1359–1365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simons M et al. (2002) Pharmacological treatment of coronary artery disease with recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2: double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Circulation 105: 788–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lunde K et al. (2006) Intracoronary injection of mononuclear bone marrow cells in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 355: 1199–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Assmus B et al. (2006) Transcoronary transplantation of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 355: 1222–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Losordo DW et al. (2002) Phase 1/2 placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalating trial of myocardial vascular endothelial growth factor 2 gene transfer by catheter delivery in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation 105: 2012–2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kastrup J et al. Euroinject One Group (2005) Direct intramyocardial plasmid vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 gene therapy in patients with stable severe angina pectoris. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study: the Euroinject One trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 45: 982–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs S et al. (2006) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, pilot study of the safety and feasibility of catheter-based intramyocardial injection of AdVEGF121 in patients with refractory advanced coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68: 372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perin EC et al. (2004) Improved exercise capacity and ischemia 6 and 12 months after transendocardial injection of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 110 (Suppl 1): II213–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tse H-F et al. (2003) Angiogenesis in ischaemic myocardium by intramyocardial autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation. Lancet 361: 47–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs S et al. (2006) Safety and feasibility of transendocardial autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with advanced heart disease. Am J Cardiol 97: 823–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tse H-F et al. (2006) Prospective randomized trial of direct endomyocardial implantation of bone marrow cells for therapeutic angiogenesis in coronary artery disease. Presented at the 55th Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology: 2006 11–14 March; Atlanta, GA

  14. Siminiak T et al. (2005) Percutaneous trans-coronary-venous transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in the treatment of post-infarction myocardial contractility impairment: the POZNAN trial. Eur Heart J 26: 1188–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gepstein L et al. (1997) A novel method for nonfluoroscopic catheter-based electroanatomical mapping of the heart. In vitro and in vivo accuracy results. Circulation 95: 1611–1622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs S et al. (2001) Comparison of endocardial electromechanical mapping with radionuclide perfusion imaging to assess myocardial viability and severity of myocardial ischemia in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 87: 874–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kornowski R et al. (2001) Catheter-based electromechanical mapping to assess regional myocardial function: a comparative analysis with transthoracic echocardiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52: 342–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiggers H et al. (2003) Electromechanical mapping versus positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 843–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dvorak HF (2005) Angiogenesis: update 2005. J Thromb Haemost 3: 1835–1842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Byrne AM et al. (2005) Angiogenic and cell survival functions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). J Cell Mol Med 9: 777–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Galiano RD et al. (2004) Topical vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates diabetic wound healing through increased angiogenesis and by mobilizing and recruiting bone marrow-derived cells. Am J Pathol 164: 1935–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grines C et al. (2003) Angiogenic gene therapy with adenovirus 5 fibroblast growth factor-4 (Ad5FGF-4): a new option for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 92: 24N–31N

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartunek J et al. (2005) Intracoronary injection of CD133-positive enriched bone marrow progenitor cells promotes cardiac recovery after recent myocardial infarction: feasibility and safety. Circulation 112 (Suppl): I178–183

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nakagami H et al. (2006) Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells as a novel option for regenerative cell therapy. J Atheroscler Thromb 13: 77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang WJ et al. (2006) Morphologic, phenotypic and functional characteristics of endothelial cells derived from human hepatic cavernous hemangioma. J Vasc Res 43: 522–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishishita T et al. (2004) A potential pro-angiogenic cell therapy with human placenta-derived mesenchymal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 325: 24–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McMahon JM et al. (2006) Gene transfer into rat mesenchymal stem cells: a comparative study of viral and nonviral vectors. Stem Cells Dev 15: 87–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hou D et al. (2005) Radiolabeled cell distribution after intramyocardial, intracoronary, and interstitial retrograde coronary venous delivery: implications for current clinical trials. Circulation 112: 150–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shmuel Fuchs.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Shmuel Fuchs receives consultation fees from Biologics Delivery Systems Group and Cordis Corporation. Alexander Battler and Ran Kornowski declared no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, S., Battler, A. & Kornowski, R. Catheter-based stem cell and gene therapy for refractory myocardial ischemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 4 (Suppl 1), S89–S95 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0762

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0762

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing