Michelle Francl argues we should embrace molecular models, not tuck them away in the closet.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Freeth, T. et al. Nature 444, 587–591 (2006).
Crick, F. Nature 248, 766–769 (1974).
Watson, J. The Double Helix p194 (Simon & Schuster, 2001)
Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 961–964 (1997).
Wu, H.-K. & Shah, P. Sci. Educ. 88, 465–492 (2004).
Herman, T. et al. BAMBEd 34, 247–254 (2006).
Corey, R. B. & Pauling, L. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 24, 621–627 (1953).
Kawakami, M. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 084303 (2012).
Ferey, N. Virtual Reality 13, 273–293 (2009).
Gillet, A., Sanner, M. Stoffler, D. & Olson, A. Structure 13, 483–491 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francl, M. Tangible assets. Nature Chem 5, 147–148 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1585
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1585