Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

FACS-based isolation of slowly growing cells: Double encapsulation of yeast in gel microdrops

Abstract

Isolating hyperproducing cells is important in biotechnology, but these cells usually grow slowly and can be overgrown by poorly producing cells. We describe a new method of isolating slowly growing cells from among rapidly growing cells, which has the potential for automation and high throughput (e.g., 100,000 cells/h). A model system is presented consisting of a mixed population of slowly growing mutant and rapidly growing wild-type yeast, which were encapsulated in double agarose gel microdrops (dGMDs); with most dGMDs initially containing single cells. Double encapsulation locates parent cells near dGMD centers, making microcolony measurement more accurate. After a 15-h incubation, fluorescent activated cell sorting was used to analyze and sort dGMDs with small microcolonies (slow growers) from dGMDs with large microcolonies (rapid growers). Successful isolation of slow growers from a mixed population of predominantly rapidly growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells was achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozturk, S.S. and Palsson, B.O. 1990. Loss of antibody productivity during long-term cultivation of a hybridoma cell line in low serum and serum free media. Hybridoma 9: 167–175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McKinney, K.L., Dilwith, R., and Belfort, G. 1991. Manipulation of heterogeneous hybridoma cultures for overproduction of monoclonal antibodies. Biotech. Prog. 7: 445–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Backus, M.P. and Stauffer, J.F. 1955. The production and selection of a family of strains in Penicillim chrysogenum. Mycologia 47: 429–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. AI-Rubeai, M. and Emery, A.N. 1993. Flow cytometry in animal cell culture. Bio/Technology 11: 572–579.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro, H.M. 1994. Practical flow cytometry ed. 3, A.R. Liss, New York.

  6. Weaver, J.C., Bliss, J.G., Harrison, G.I., Powell, K.T., and Williams, G.B. 1991. Microdrop technology: a general method for separating cells by function and composition. Methods 2: 234–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weaver, J.C., Bliss, J.G., Powell, K.T., Harrison, G.I., and Williams, G.B. 1991. Rapid clonal growth measurements at the single-cell level: gel microdroplets and flow cytometry. Bio/Technology 9: 873–877.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahar, E., Nir, R. and Lamed, R. 1994. Flow cytometric analysis of entire micro-colonies. Cytometry 15: 213–221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan, C., Nguyen, B-T., and Sullivan, S.J. 1995. A rapid assay for mycobacterial growth and antibiotic sensitivity using gel microdrop encapsulation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33: 1720–1726.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Weaver, J.C., Seissler, P.E., Threefoot, S.A., Lorenz, J.W., Huie, T., Rodrigues, R., et al. 1984. Microbiological measurements by immobilization of cells within small volume elements. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 434: 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weaver, J.C., Williams, G.B., Klibanov, A.M., and Demain, A.L. 1988. Gel microdroplets: rapid detection and enumeration of individual microorganisms by their metabolic activity. Bio/Technology 6: 1084–1089.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Powell, K.T. and Weaver, J.C. 1990. Gel microdroplets and flow cytometry: rapid determination of antibody secretionby individual cells within a cell population. Bio/Technology 8: 333–337.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray, F., Kenney, J.S., and Dunne, J.F. 1995. Secretion capture and report web: use of affinity derived agarose microdroplets for the selection of hybridoma cells. J. Imm. Meth. 182: 155–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenney, J.S., Gray, F., Ancel, M-H., and Dunne, J.F. 1995. Production of monoclonal antibodies using a secretion capture and report web. Bio/Technology 13: 787–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weaver, J.C., Dunne, J.F., Gray, F., Lazzari, K.G., and Lin, J.B. 1995. Gel microdrop assays for antibody secretion by hybridoma cells, pp. 39–62 in Flow cytometry applications in cell culture. AI-Rubeai, M. and Emery, A.N. (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lazzari, K., Nguyen, A., Abebe, J., Mac, I., Chang, A., Lin, J.B., et al. 1995. Encapsulation and stabilization of chromsomes in gel microdrops. Cytometry 21: 111–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Melamed, E.R., Lindmo, T., and Mendelsohn, M.L. (eds.). 1990. Flow cytometry and sorting, ed. 2, Wiley-Liss, New York.

  18. Givan, A.L. 1992. Flow cytometry: first principles, Wiley-Liss, New York.

  19. Haugland, R.P. 1992. Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals, molecular probes, Eugene,OR.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gift, E., Park, H., Paradis, G. et al. FACS-based isolation of slowly growing cells: Double encapsulation of yeast in gel microdrops. Nat Biotechnol 14, 884–887 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0796-884

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0796-884

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing