Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Reflections on a DNA mutation scanning tool

Nature Biotechnology volume 19, pages 18–19 (2001)Cite this article

Although some 1.6 million human single-nucleotide polymorphisms have been found in the human genome and deposited to public databases, as of November 20001, there is still a great need for identifying unknown DNA sequence variations. This is particularly important in positional cloning studies in which genes in candidate regions identified by genetic mapping must be scanned for mutations. Add to this the requirement for ways of finding DNA sequence variants in pathogens, crops, and domesticated animals, and it becomes evident that efficient and cost-effective DNA scanning methods are in great demand. In this issue, Nakatani et al.2 describe a promising new method for DNA mismatch scanning.

Although the gold standard of mutation scanning is still Sanger DNA sequencing, the expense and labor involved makes it difficult for most groups to scan more than a handful of genes in any given candidate region. To speed up the process and reduce the cost of finding DNA sequence variations, several scanning methods have been developed. DNA sequence variation scanning methods can be divided into three groups: those based on detecting the presence of heteroduplex mismatches, those based on physical differences of single-stranded DNA molecules between the variants, and those based on simplified DNA sequencing approaches3. By far the most widely used scanning methods are those involving the detection of mismatched DNA molecules. Regardless of the mechanism of variation scanning, a separation step by gel (or capillary) electrophoresis or high-performance liquid chromatography is required in most methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Diagram of surface plasmon resonance assay using a sensor chip with immobilized dimeric naphthyridine ligands (shown in green) that specifically bind to G-G mismatches (indicated by asterisks).

©Bob Crimi

References

  1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/

  2. Nakatani, K. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 51– 55 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwok, P.-Y. & Chen, X. In Genetic engineering, principles and methods, Vol. 20. (ed. Setlow, J.K.) 125– 134 (Plenum Press, New York, NY; 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lyondagger, E. et al. Mol. Diagn. 3, 203– 209 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellanne-Chantelot, C. et al. Mut. Res. 382, 35– 43.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. associate professor of dermatology and genetics at Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, 63110, MO

    Pui-Yan Kwok

Authors
  1. Pui-Yan Kwok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwok, PY. Reflections on a DNA mutation scanning tool. Nat Biotechnol 19, 18–19 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/83454

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/83454

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing