This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The genetic technologies questionnaire: lay judgments about genetic technologies align with ethical theory, are coherent, and predict behaviour
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 25 May 2022
-
Super-Men and Wonder-Women: the Relationship Between the Acceptance of Self-enhancement, Personality, and Values
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Open Access 23 May 2022
-
Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose
Agriculture and Human Values Open Access 30 June 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Baltimore, D. et al. Science 348, 36–38 (2015).
Bosley, K.S. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 478–486 (2015).
US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics and Governance (The National Academies Press, 2017).
Fitz, N.S. et al. Neuroethics 7, 173–188 (2014).
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D. & Yamamoto, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2395–2400 (2015).
Schermer, M. Bioethics 22, 355–363 (2008).
Parens, E. Hastings Cent. Rep. 35, 34–41 (2005).
Torgersen, H. et al. in Biotechnology: the Making of a Global Controversy, (eds. Bauer, M. & Gaskell, G.) 21–94 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002).
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the European Commission as part of the study “Neuroenhancement, responsible research and innovation” Grant Agreement No: 321464. The field work was conducted by Respondi. This study complied with the ethical regulations of the Research Ethics Committee of the London School of Economics. Data created during this research are openly available online at https://zenodo.org/record/823634.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Note 1
Supplementary Note, Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 468 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaskell, G., Bard, I., Allansdottir, A. et al. Public views on gene editing and its uses. Nat Biotechnol 35, 1021–1023 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3958
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3958
This article is cited by
-
The genetic technologies questionnaire: lay judgments about genetic technologies align with ethical theory, are coherent, and predict behaviour
BMC Medical Ethics (2022)
-
Public attitudes in the clinical application of genome editing on human embryos in Japan: a cross-sectional survey across multiple stakeholders
Journal of Human Genetics (2022)
-
Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose
Agriculture and Human Values (2022)
-
Super-Men and Wonder-Women: the Relationship Between the Acceptance of Self-enhancement, Personality, and Values
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement (2022)
-
Students’ attitudes towards somatic genome editing versus genome editing of the germline using an example of familial leukemia
Journal of Community Genetics (2021)