Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Cell biology

Nondisjunction, aneuploidy and tetraploidy

Abstract

Arising from: Q. Shi & R. W. King Nature 437, 1038–1042 (2005); Shi & King reply

One simple, widely accepted mechanism for generating an aberrant chromosome number, or aneuploidy, is through nondisjunction — a chromosome distribution error that occurs during mitosis when both copies of a duplicated chromosome are deposited into one daughter cell and none into the other. Shi and King1 challenge this view, concluding that nondisjunction does not yield aneuploid cells directly, but instead gives rise to tetraploid cells that may subsequently become aneuploid through further division. Here we show that the direct result of chromosome nondisjunction is gain or loss of a single chromosome, which results in near-diploid aneuploidy, not tetraploidy. We suggest that chromatin trapped in the cytokinetic cleavage furrow is the more likely reason for furrow regression and tetraploidization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Nondisjunction causes near-diploid aneuploidy, not cytokinesis failure, in primary cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi, Q. & King, R. W. Nature 437, 1038–1042 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weaver, B. A. A. et al. J. Cell Biol. 162, 551–563 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Babu, J. R. et al. . J. Cell Biol. 160, 341–353 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuura, S. et al. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 140, 358–367 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanks, S. et al. . Nature Genet. 36, 1159–1161 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Limwongse, C., Schwartz, S., Bocian, M. & Robin, N. H. Am. J. Med. Genet. 82, 20–24 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullins, J. M. & Biesele, J. J. J. Cell Biol. 73, 672–684 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreassen, P. R., Lohez, O. D., Lacroix, F. B. & Margolis, R. L. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1315–1328 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Uetake, Y. & Sluder, G. J. Cell Biol. 165, 609–615 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong, C. & Stearns, T. BMC Cell Biol. 6, doi:10.1186/1471-2121-6-6 (2005).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don W. Cleveland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weaver, B., Silk, A. & Cleveland, D. Nondisjunction, aneuploidy and tetraploidy. Nature 442, E9–E10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05139

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05139

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing