On 11 April, the US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA, APHIS) proposed the amendment of the Animal Welfare Act regulations “to require that research facilities, dealers, and exhibitors maintain medical records as part of their program of adequate veterinary care ... as a means of communication concerning the care being provided to animals and to ensure that the animals receive adequate veterinary care1.”

Subparts C and D of 9 CFR part 2 of the animal welfare regulations require each research facility, dealer, and exhibitor to have an Attending Veterinarian and maintain a program of adequate veterinary care. Although the regulations do specify several elements constituting a program of adequate veterinary care that imply the use of medical records, they do not currently require the keeping of medical records.

In justifying the need to maintain veterinary medical records, the USDA stated that adequate veterinary care to animals depends on accurate medical records; in addition, such records provide a means of communication between caregivers and provide a tool for USDA inspectors to verify the adequacy of animal care.

The USDA's proposed amendments to 9 CFR part 2 would add a new section requiring the maintenance of legible medical records as an additional element of the program of adequate veterinary care. Each medical record would have to include “(1) The identity of the animal (with the exception that routine husbandry, such as vaccinations, preventive medical procedures, or treatments, performed on all animals in a group (or herd) may be kept on a single record); (2) the date, description of the problem, pertinent history, observations, examination findings, test results, and plan for treatment and care with a tentative diagnosis and a prognosis, when appropriate; (3) the type and chronology of treatment procedures performed, the context of the problem to which the treatment procedures pertain, and the identification of the medication used, the date given, dosage, route of administration, frequency, and duration of treatment; (4) the names of all vaccines administered and the dates of vaccination; and (5) the dates and results of all screening, routine, or other required or recommended tests1.”

The USDA proposed further to amend the record-keeping standards for research facilities to “require that medical records be kept for 1 year after the disposition of the animals and that one copy of those records be provided to subsequent owners of the animals or to any person to whom the animals will be consigned1.”

APHIS does not anticipate that these changes will result in a great increase in burden to regulated facilities, because most facilities already comply with these proposed minimum standards for medical records. However, some costs may result from the need to record and maintain medical records under this proposed rule, although the USDA considers them to be minimal.