Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Comparing automated vs manual leukocyte differential counts for quantifying the ‘left shift’ in the blood of neonates

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

The neutrophil ‘left shift’ can be measured via the immature to total (I/T) neutrophil ratio or the absolute bands per μl using a manual differential count. It can also be measured from an automated differential count by the immature granulocyte percentage (IG%) or the absolute IG per μl. In neonates, it is unknown if the manual or automated differential count is superior.

Study Design:

We directly compared complete blood counts (CBCs) with manual and automated differential counts from infants <90 days old, and documented whether or not each neonate was infected. We developed reference intervals for I/T ratio, bands per μl, IG% and IG per μl using values from non-infected neonates.

Results:

The database had 10 714 CBCs. The upper reference interval for I/T ratio was 0.29 in the first 48 h and 0.31 thereafter; bands per μl was 3710 μl−1 in the first 48 h and 1785 μl−1 thereafter. IG% was 6.2% then 4.2%; IG per μl was 1460 μl−1 then 613 μl−1. Statistical performances of the four methods were equivalent for identifying infection.

Conclusions:

We developed reference intervals for four methods of quantifying a neonate’s ‘left shift’. The information from automated differentials is not inferior to that from manual differentials in identifying infections, but automated differentials have the advantages of a larger sample size, being less expensive, and faster performance times.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manroe BL, Rosenfeld CR, Weinberg AG, Browne R . The differential leukocyte count in the assessment and outcome of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. J Pediatr 1977; 91: 632–637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen RD, Bradley PP, Rothstein G . The leukocyte left shift in clinical and experimental neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr 1981; 98: 101–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg DN, Yoder BA . Changes in the differential white blood cell count in screening for group B streptococcal sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9: 886–889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrence SM, Eckert J, Makoni M, Pereira HA . Is the use of complete blood counts with manual differentials an antiquated method of determining neutrophil composition in newborns? Ann Clin Lab Sci 2015; 45: 403–413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schelonka RL, Yoder BA, Hall RB, Trippett TM, Louder DS, Hickman JR et al. Differentiation of segmented and band neutrophils during the early newborn period. J Pediatr 1995; 127: 298–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Newman TB, Draper D, Puopolo KM, Wi S, Escobar GJ . Combining immature and total neutrophil counts to predict early onset sepsis in term and late preterm newborns: use of the I/T2. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33: 798–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornbleet PJ . Clinical utility of the band count. Clin Lab Med 2002; 22: 101–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arneth BM, Ragaller M, Hommel K, Tiebel O, Menschikowski M, Siegert G . Novel parameters of extended complete blood cell count under fluorescence flow cytometry in patients with sepsis. J Clin Lab Anal 2014; 28: 130–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker PH, Fenneteau O, Da Costa L . Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XN-1000 hematology analyzer in assessment of the white blood cell count differential in pediatric specimens. Int J Lab Hematol 2016; 38: 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong EC . Hematology analyzers: special considerations for pediatric patients. Clin Lab Med 2015; 35: 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chabot-Richards DS, George TI . White blood cell counts: reference methodology. Clin Lab Med 2015; 35: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H, Hur M, Choi SG, Moon HW, Yun YM, Hwang HS et al. Performance evaluation of Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in umbilical cord blood: a comparison study with Sysmex XE-2100. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014; 52: 1771–1779.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiland EL, Sandhaus LM, Georgievskaya Z, Hoyen CM, O'Riordan MA, Nock ML . Adult and child automated immature granulocyte norms are inappropriate for evaluating early-onset sepsis in newborns. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103: 494–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nigro KG, O'Riordan M, Molloy EJ, Walsh MC, Sandhaus LM . Performance of an automated immature granulocyte count as a predictor of neonatal sepsis. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 123: 618–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boggs DR, Marsh JC, Chervenick PA, Cartwright GE, Wintrobe MM . Neutrophil releasing activity in plasma of normal human subjects injected with endotoxin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1968; 127: 689–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Christensen RD, Shigeoka AO, Hill HR, Rothstein G . Circulating and storage neutrophil changes in experimental type II group B streptococcal sepsis. Pediatr Res 1980; 14: 806–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Novak RW . The beleaguered band count. Clin Lab Med 1993; 13: 895–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gagon TE, Athens JW, Boggs DR, Cartwright GE . An evaluation of the variance of leukocyte counts as performed with the hemocytometer, Coulter, and Fisher intruments. Tech Bull Regist Med Technol 1966; 36: 274–281.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernstein LH, Rucinski J . Measurement of granulocyte maturation may improve the early diagnosis of the septic state. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49: 2089–2095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernandes B, Hamaguchi Y . Automated enumeration of immature granulocytes. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128: 454–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ha SO, Park SH, Park SH, Park JS, Huh JW, Lim CM et al. Fraction of immature granulocytes reflects severity but not mortality in sepsis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2015; 75: 36–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker RI, Willemze R . Neutrophil kinetics and the regulation of granulopoiesis. Rev Infect Dis 1980; 2: 282–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Skubitz KM . Neutrophilic leukocytes. In: Greer JP, Arber DA, List AF, Glader B, Means RT, Paraskevas F et al. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 2014; 2003: p137.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marsh JC, Boggs DR, Cartwright GE, Wintrobe MM . Neutrophil kinetics in acute infection. J Clin Invest 1967; 46: 1943–1953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Engle WA, McGuire WA, Schreiner RL, Yu PL . Neutrophil storage pool depletion in neonates with sepsis and neutropenia. J Pediatr 1988; 113: 747–749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cairo MS . Neutrophil storage pool depletion in neonates with sepsis. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 1064–1065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Henry E, Walker D, Wiedmeier SE, Christensen RD . Hematological abnormalities during the first week of life among neonates with Down syndrome: data from a multihospital healthcare system. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A: 42–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wheeler JG, Chauvenet AR, Johnson CA, Dillard R, Block SM, Boyle R et al. Neutrophil storage pool depletion in septic, neutropenic neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis 1984; 3: 407–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Theodore J. Pysher, Professor of Pathology, University of Utah and Director Of Clinical Pathology Primary Children’s Hospital, and Christopher M. Lehman, Professor of Pathology University of Utah and Medical Director Of Clinical Pathology, University of Utah Hospital for helpful discussions and for reviewing the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Jolanta Kunicka and Lance Kocherhans of Sysmex America Inc. for helpful discussions. We also thank the following members of the Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Laboratory staff for extracting data from the hematology analyzers; Robert Childs, Dereck Daniels, Robert Dallin, Rachael Ethington, Dave Garner, Laurie Jeffs, Jennessa Jessop, Heather Kuusela, Chris Partington, Tim Patten, Brooke Qi, Lauralyn Ragin, Tara Regginello, Aba Saunders, Alicia Simon, Jennifer Sorensen, Thomas Taylor, Ashley Windsor and Ryan Wilcox. The study was supported by a research grant (to RDC) from the Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation, Murray, UT, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B C MacQueen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacQueen, B., Christensen, R., Yoder, B. et al. Comparing automated vs manual leukocyte differential counts for quantifying the ‘left shift’ in the blood of neonates. J Perinatol 36, 843–848 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.92

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.92

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links