Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version

Journal of Perinatology volume 36, pages 439–442 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To determine intrapartum and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.

Study Design:

This was a retrospective cohort study of outcomes following successful external cephalic version in 411 women at an Australian tertiary maternity unit between November 2008 and March 2015. The study cohort was compared with a control group of 1236 women with cephalic presentation who underwent spontaneous labor. Intrapartum intervention rates and adverse neonatal outcomes were compared between both groups.

Results:

The success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) was 66.4%. The spontaneous vaginal delivery rate in the study cohort was 59.4% (224/411) vs 72.8% (900/1236) in the control cohort (P<0.001). Intrapartum intervention rates (emergency cesarean section (CS) and instrumental delivery) were higher in the ECV group (38% vs 27.2%, P<0.001). Rates of emergency CS for non-reassuring fetal status (9.5%, 39/411 vs 4.4%, 54/1236, P⩽0.001) and failure to progress (13.4%, 55/411 vs 4.1%, 51/1236, P<0.001) were higher in the study cohort. Neonatal outcomes were worse in the study cohort—Apgar score <7 at 5 min (2.2%, 9/411 vs 0.6%, 8/1236, P<0.001) and abnormal cord gases (8.5%, 35/411 vs 0.2%, 3/1236, P<0.001). Rates for resuscitation at birth and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were higher in the study cohort (6.1% vs 4.1% and 1.9% vs 1.1%, respectively) but these were not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

Labor following successful ECV is more likely to result in increased intrapartum intervention rates and poorer neonatal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR . Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356 (9239): 1375–1383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ACOG. Practice Bulletin 13 External Cephalic Version. 2001.

  3. Beuckens A, Rijnders M, Verburgt-Doeleman G, Rijninks-van Driel G, Thorpe J, Hutton E . An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives. BJOG 2015. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13234.

  4. Mowat A, Gardener G . Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 54 (1): 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW . Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (6): 630 e631–630 e637; discussion e631-635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW . Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33 (1): 76–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Salzer L, Nagar R, Melamed N, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y, Yogev Y . Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (1): 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM . External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 4: CD000083.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ACOG. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (3): 693–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vlemmix F, Rosman AN, Fleuren MA, Rijnders ME, Beuckens A, Haak MC et al. Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. RANZCOG. Management of Breech Presentation at Term. College Statement C-Obs 11, 2013.

  12. Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK . High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic version. BJOG 2002; 109 (6): 627–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vezina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, Marquette GP, Boucher M . Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (3): 763–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddiqui D, Stiller RJ, Collins J, Laifer SA . Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181 (5 Pt 1): 1092–1095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Clock C, Kurtzman J, White J, Chung JH . Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (2): 96–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Policiano C, Costa A, Valentim-Lourenco A, Clode N, Graca LM . Route of delivery following successful external cephalic version. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 126 (3): 272–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Balayla J, Dahdouh EM, Villeneuve S, Boucher M, Gauthier RJ, Audibert F et al. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (5): 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA . Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 7: CD000166.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Bell JC, Olive EC, Peat B . Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006; 20 (2): 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Hundt M, Velzel J, de Groot CJ, Mol BW, Kok M . Mode of delivery after successful external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (6): 1327–1334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lau TK, Lo KW, Rogers M . Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176 (1 Pt 1): 218–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan LY, Tang JL, Tsoi KF, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK . Intrapartum cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (1): 155–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hants Y, Kabiri D, Elchalal U, Arbel-Alon S, Drukker L, Ezra Y . Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292 (2): 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Theron GB, Kader R . Obstetric outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 127 (3): 298–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cha LYS, Lau TK, Chiu PY, Wing-KinWong G, Leung TN . Levels of cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone after external cephalic version. BJOG 2001; 108 (10): 1076–1080.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Law LW, Lau TK . Prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27 (4): 416–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, Kumar S . Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (2): 124 e121–124 e126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK . External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exerted. BJOG 2004; 111 (5): 430–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grace L, Greer RM, Kumar S . Perinatal consequences of a category 1 cesarean section at term. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (7): e007248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wax JR, Sutula K, Lerer T, Steinfeld JD, Ingardia CJ . Labor and delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 2000; 17 (4): 183–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK . Cord blood acid-base status at delivery after successful external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83 (5): 436–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Barb Soong, consultant midwife in helping collect the data as well as staff at the Mater Centre for Mater and Fetal Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    A Basu, C Flatley & S Kumar

  2. School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    S Kumar

Authors
  1. A Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Flatley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basu, A., Flatley, C. & Kumar, S. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version. J Perinatol 36, 439–442 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.220

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.220

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links