Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Neonatal outcome of extremely preterm Asian infants ⩽28 weeks over a decade in the new millennium

Journal of Perinatology volume 35, pages 297–303 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate predischarge neonatal mortality and morbidity and associated risk factors in extremely preterm Asian infants ⩽28 weeks, over a decade, so as to facilitate formulation of perinatal guidelines and counseling.

Study Design:

Cohort study of 887 liveborn extremely preterm neonates between 2000 and 2009 at KKH, the centralized perinatal center in Singapore. Outcome measures were predischarge mortality, presence of one or more major neonatal morbidities and the composite outcome of mortality or neonatal morbidity.

Result:

Overall survival to discharge was 709/887 (80%) and was significantly higher with increasing gestational age (GA) (19% at 23 weeks to 93% at 28 weeks, P<0.001). Survival remained unchanged between 78 and 86% during the decade with no significant secular trend. Overall incidence of major morbidities were bronchopulmonary dysplasia (29%), late onset sepsis (23%), severe retinopathy of prematurity (21%), Grade 3 to 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (12%) and necrotizing enterocolitis ⩾Bells’ stage II/focal intestinal perforation (9%). Composite morbidity was seen in 465/835 (56%) neonatal intensive-care unit admissions, decreased with increasing GA (P<0.001; odds ratio 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.75) and was independently predicted by birth weight, Clinical Risk Index for Babies–revised version II score, male gender, presence of patent ductus arteriosus and airleaks.

Conclusion:

Although there was no significant trend in neonatal survival or composite morbidity over the decade, improved survival and morbidity were seen with increasing GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (2): 147.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lundqvist P, Kallen K, Hallstorm I, Westas LH . Trends in outcomes for very preterm infants in the southern region of Sweden over a 10 year period. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98: 648–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt B, Asztalos EV, Roberts RS, Robertson CMT, Sauve RS et al. Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months. Results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterm. JAMA 2003; 289: 1124–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassler D, Stoll BJ, Schmidt B, Asztalos EV, Roberts RS et al. Using a count of neonatal morbidities to predict poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants: Added role of neonatal infection. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gargus RA, Vohr BR, Tyson JE, High P, Higgins RD, Wrage LA et al. Unimpaired outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lubcheno LO, Hansman C, Bay E . Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birthweight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 793–800.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenton TR . A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda’s chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tita ATN, Andrews WW . Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatol 2010; 37: 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Redline RW . Inflammatory response in acute chorioamnionitis. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17: 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parry G, Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W . CRIB II: an update of the clinical risk index for babies score. UK Neonatal Staffing Study Collaborative Group. Lancet 2003; 361 (9371): 1789–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gagliardi L, Cavazza A, Brunelli A, Battaglioli M, Merazzi D et al. Assessing mortality risk in very low birthweight infants: a comparison of CRIB, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (5): F419–F422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lodha A, Sauve R, Chen S, Tang S, Christianson H . Clinical Risk Index for babies score for the prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years of age in infants of very low birthweight. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51 (11): 895–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jobe AH, Bancalari E . Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 1723–1729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Papile LA, Munsick-Bruno G, S Chaefer A . Relationship of cerebral intraventricular haemorrhage in early childhood neurological handicaps. J Pediatr 1983; 103: 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. An International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity Revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123 (7): 991–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pumberger W, Mayr M, Kohlhauser C, Weninger M . Spontaneous localized intestinal perforation in very low birth weight infants: a distinct clinical entity different from necrotizing enterocolitis. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195 (6): 796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Husain N, Galou M, Ehrerikranz RA, Henson VC, Rowe JC . Pre-discharge outcome of 22-27 weeks gestational age infants born at tertiary care centres in connecticut. Implications for perinatal management. Conn Med 1998; 62 (3): 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hintz SR, Poole WK, Wright LL . Changes in mortality and morbidities among infants born less than 25 weeks during the post-surfactant era. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F128–F133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile LA, Stoll BJ et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institue of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2001; 107: e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptok AR et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanhaesebrouck TP, Allegaert K, Bottu J, Debauche C, Devlieger H et al. EPIBEL Study: Outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in belgium for the EPIBEL study group. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (3): 663–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Berger TM, Steurer MA, Woerner A, Schiffer PM, Adams M . Trends and centre to centre variability in survival rates of very preterm infants (&lt;32 weeks) over a 10 year period in Switzerland. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; F1–F6.

  24. Shah PS, Sankaran K, Aziz K, Allen AC, Seshia M, Ohlsson A et al. Canadian Neonatal Network Outcomes of preterm infants &lt;29 weeks gestation over 10-year period in Canada: a cause for concern? J Perinatol 32: 132–138.

  25. Draper ES, Zeitlin J, Fenton AC . Investigating the variations in survival rates for very preterm infants in 10 European regions: the MOSAIC birth cohort. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94: F158–F163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES . Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: Comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICURE studies). BMJ 2012; 345: e7976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hussain N, Rosenkrantz TS . Ethical considerations in the management of infants born at extremely low gestational age. Semin Perinatol 2003; 27 (6): 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tommiska V, Heinonen K, Lehtonen L, Renlund M, Saarela T, Tammela O et al. No improvement in outcome of nationwide extremely low birth weight infant populations between 1996-1997 and 1990-2000. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Markestad T, Kaaresen PI, Ronnestad A, Reigstad H, Lossius K, Medbo S et alNorwegian extreme prematurity study group. Early death, morbidity and need of treatment among extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1289–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan MA, Goldenberg RL, Schulkin J . Obstetrician-gynaecologist practices regarding preterm birth at the limit of viability. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21 (2): 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Perinatal Care at the Threshold of Viability. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 617–624.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Dilemmas in current practice: babies born at the borderline of viability. Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics: London, UK, 2006, pp 67–87.

  33. Pignotti MS, Donzelli G . Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: An international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Itabashi K, Horiuchi T, Kusuda S, Kabe K . Mortality rates for extremely low birthweight infants born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kyser KL, Morriss FH Jr, Bell EF, Klein JM, Dagle JM . Improving survival of extremely preterm infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (4): 795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Field DJ, Dorling JS, Manktelow BN, Draper ES . Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994–1999 compared with 2000–2005. BMJ 2008; 336: 1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fischer N, Steurer MA, Adams M, Berger TM . Survival rates of extremely preterm infants (gestational age &lt;26 weeks) in Switzerland: impact of the Swiss guidelines for the care of infants born at the limit of viability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94 (6): F407–F413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. The Express Team. One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 2009; 301 (21): 2225–2233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kutz P, Horsch S, Kuhn L, Roll C . Single centre vs population based outcome data of extremely preterm infants at the limits of viability. ACTA Paediatr 2009; 98: 1451–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low birth weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA 2004; 292: 2357–2365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kugelman A, Bader D, Lerner-Geva L, Boyko V, Levitzki O, Riskin A et al. Poor outcomes at discharge among extremely premature infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166 (6): 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kent AL, Wright IM, Abdel-Latif ME . New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Neonatal Intensive Care Units Audit Group. Mortality and adverse neulogic outcomes are greater in preterm male infants. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Damodaram M, Story L, Kulinskaya E, Rutherford M, Kumar S . Early adverse perinatal complications in preterm growth-restricted fetuses. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51: 204–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD . Intensive care for extreme prematurity—moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1672–1681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Evans DJ, Levene MI . Evidence of selection bias in preterm survival studies: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84: F79–F84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rautava L, Lehtonen L, Peltola M, Korvenranta E, Korvenranta H, Linna M et al. The effect of birth in secondary or tertiary level hospitals in Finland on mortality in very preterm infants: a birth-register study. Pediatrics 2007; 119: e257–e263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lorch SA, Baiocchi M, Ahlberg CE, Small DS . The differential impact of delivery hospital on the outcomes of premature infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130: 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lim Wai Yee for her assistance with the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neonatology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

    P Agarwal, B Sriram & V S Rajadurai

Authors
  1. P Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B Sriram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V S Rajadurai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Agarwal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, P., Sriram, B. & Rajadurai, V. Neonatal outcome of extremely preterm Asian infants ⩽28 weeks over a decade in the new millennium. J Perinatol 35, 297–303 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.205

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links