Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

A case for an in utero etiology of chronic SDH/effusion of infancy (letter)

Journal of Perinatology volume 32, pages 79–81 (2012)Cite this article

We read with interest the Perinatal/Neonatal Case Presentation involving a 3-month-old infant with new onset seizures who reportedly was discovered to have a chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH)1 after having ‘new onset partial complex seizures’. The infant, a dichorionic–dizygotic twin (twin A), was noted to have a large head circumference and bulging fontanelle. The infant was noted to have retinal hemorrhages and had his CSDH drained of ‘xanthochromic fluid with some fresh blood’, which was ‘under very high pressure’. The author concluded that the infant's intracranial findings were the result of an in utero ‘process’ as opposed to a postnatal traumatic event. Although the case presented is intriguing, we have concerns about the case vignette and the interpretation of the data presented that make it difficult for us to draw any meaningful conclusions.

The vignette presented is apparently from a case that the author reviewed for a legal process and was not an infant whom he provided care for. The author reports that a review of the prenatal records supports the infant's CSDH being from an in utero origin. The support for this conclusion is based upon comparison of the intrauterine growth pattern and head shape of the twins. It is unclear how this conclusion can be supported. The author reports a ‘superb series’ of prenatal ultrasounds that demonstrate an accelerating intrauterine growth of twin A as compared with twin B. The author reports a ‘mathematical analysis’ that includes a ‘‘head/body’ disproportion’ comparison index. As the mathematical analysis presented is not the one clinically used in assessing fetal growth, the value of this metric in clinical practice is unclear. The author reports that the twin B is ‘healthy by all accounts’ but includes no data to support claim. As the author points out, the twins are dizygotic (fraternal) and, therefore, comparing their growth with each other is no more meaningful than comparing the growth patterns of siblings from different pregnancies. As twin A and twin B are genetically different, their growth, relative to each other, contributes little to our understanding of the intracranial process in twin A.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Galaznik JG . A case for an in utero etiology of chronic SDH/effusion of infancy. J Perinatol 2011; 31: 220–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morad Y, Wygnansky-Jaffe T, Levin AV . Retinal haemorrhage in abusive head trauma. Clin Experimental Ophthalmol 2010; 38: 514–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Binenbaum G, Mirza-George N, Christian C, Forbes BJ . Odds of abuse associated with retinal hemorrhages in children suspected of child abuse. J AAPOS 2009; 13: 268–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhardwaj G, Chowdhury V, Jacobs MB, Moran KT, Martin FJ, Coroneo MT . A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of ocular signs in pediatric abusive head trauma. Ophthalmology 2010; 117 (5): 983–992.e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maguire S, Pickerd N, Farewell D, Mann M, Tempest V, Kemp AM . Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from noninflicted brain injury? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94: 860–867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer JS, Gunderman R, Coley BD, Bulas D, Garber M, Karmazyn B et al. ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected physical abuse—child. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8: 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kellogg ND, and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (6): 1232–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vezina G . Assessment of the nature and age of subdural collections in nonaccidental head injury with CT and MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (6): 586–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilms G, Vanderschueren G, Demaeral PH, Smet MH, Van Calenbergh F, Plets C et al. CT and MRI in infants with pericerebral collections and macrocephaly: benign enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces versus subdural collections. Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14: 855–860.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kristof R, Grimm J, Stoffel-Wagner B . Cerebrospinal fluid leakage into the subdural space: possible influence on the pathogenesis and recurrence frequency of chronic subdural hematoma and subdural hygroma. Journal of Neurosurg 2008; 108: 275–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schachenmayr W, Friede RL . The origin of subdural neomembranes: part i, fine structure of the dura-arachnoid interface in man. Am J Pathol 1978; 92: 53–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Friede RL, Schachenmayr W . The origin of subdural neomembranes: part ii, fine structure of neomembranes. Am J Pathol 1978; 92: 69–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito H, Yamamoto S, Komai T, Mizukoshi H . Role of local hyperfibrinolysis in the etiology of chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 1976; 45 (1): 26–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito H, Yamamoto S, Saito K, Ikeda K, Hisada K . Quantitative estimation of hemorrhage in chronic subdural hematoma using the 51Cr erythrocyte labeling method. J Neurosurg 1987; 66 (6): 862–864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Till K . Subdural haematoma and effusion in infancy. Br Med J 1968; 3: 400–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnes PD, Galaznik JG, Gardner H, Shuman M . Infant acute life-threatening event—dysphagic choking versus nonaccidental injury. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2010; 17: 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greeley CS . Infant Fatality (letter). Semin Pediatr Neurol 2010; 17: 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA

    C Greeley

  2. Imaging and Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA

    S John

Authors
  1. C Greeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Greeley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greeley, C., John, S. A case for an in utero etiology of chronic SDH/effusion of infancy (letter). J Perinatol 32, 79–81 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.77

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.77

Search

Advanced search

Quick links