Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Estimated exposure of hands inside the protective gloves used by non-occupational handlers of agricultural pesticides

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 27, pages 625–631 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Exposure of handlers’/operators’ hands is a main route of agricultural pesticides entry into their body. Non-occupational handlers still lack information about appropriate selection of protective gloves to minimize exposure and reduce adverse effects of these chemicals. According to the results of our previous survey, six commercially available, water-resistant gloves commonly used by non-professional gardeners were evaluated for permeation of Acetamiprid, Pirimicarb, and Chlorpyrifos-methyl (Chlorp-m) pesticides by means of in vitro testing. In-use conditions were mimicked as close as possible. Chlorp-m through latex was observed inside the glove from >10 to ⩽15 min; however, Acetamiprid and Pirimicarb through neoprene/latex and all the three pesticides through butyl were not observed inside gloves for the duration of the experiments (the Breakthrough time (BT)>8 h). The 1-h exposure proved the interior glove contamination with Chlorp-m through disposable latex, vinyl, and nitrile gloves (51, 33, and 41% of applied dose (AD), respectively) just as with Acetamiprid and Pirimicarb through latex glove (11 and 14%AD, respectively). However, when storing the used gloves for 4 days after the exposure, no release of the three pesticides from the butyl and Acetamiprid from neoprene/latex gloves was detected. In all other cases, pesticides were found in the interior glove (36–79, 31–63, and 51–81%AD for Acetamiprid, Pirimicarb, and Chlorp-m, respectively). If used repeatedly, gloves contaminated in this way lose their protective function but give the user a false sense of security. The results suggest that (i) water-resistant gloves are not necessarily pesticide resistant; (ii) disposable latex gloves commonly worn by non-professional gardeners provide inadequate protection even for a short-time contact with pesticides; (iii) to assess the efficiency of reusable gloves, not only BT value but also the reservoir/release effect of parent pesticide and its degradation products should be evaluated; and (iv) awareness-raising activities for non-occupational handlers of pesticides should be enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EFSA. Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment for plant protection products. EFSA J 2014; 12: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EPA. US Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2011–2 Non-Dietary Exposure Task Force 2011, pp 1–8.

  3. Lunchick C, Krolski ME Non-dietary human exposure and risk assessment: regulatory issues. In:, Krolski ME et al. Non-Dietary Human Exposure and Risk Assessment. ACS Symposium Series, Chapter 1. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA. 2010 pp 1–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawson BV, Cocker J, Evans PG, Wheller JP, Akrill PM . Internal contamination of gloves: routes and consequences. Ann Occup Hyg 2005; 49: 535–541.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Machera K, Tsakirakis A, Charistou A, Anastasiadou P, Glass CR . Dermal exposure of pesticide operators as a measure of coverall performance under field conditions. Ann Occup Hyg 2009; 53: 573–584.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldi I, Lebailly P, Jean S, Rougetet L, Dulaurent S, Marquet P . Pesticide contamination of workers in vineyards in France. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2006; 16: 115–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hojerová J, Beránková M, Peráčková Z, Birbičová S . Protective gloves use and work habits of non-professionals handling agricultural pesticides – a survey. Acta Chim Slovaca 2015; 8: 133–139. Available at http://www.acs.chtf.stuba.sk/papers/acs_0221.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zainal H, Hee SSQ . Permeation of Comite through protective gloves. J Haz Mat 2006; 137: 165–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradman A, Salvatore AL, Boeniger M, Castorina R, Snyder J, Barr DB et al. Community-based intervention to reduce pesticide exposure to farmworkers and potential take-home exposure to their families. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2009; 19: 79–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Chen L, Chen Z, Coehlo J, Cui L, Liu Y et al. Glove accumulation of pesticide residues for strawberry harvester exposure assessment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2011; 86: 615–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen JB, Sorensen JA . Glove material, reservoir formation, and dose affect glove permeation and subsequent skin permeation. Sci Total Environ 2012; 417–418: 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Furlong M, Tanner CM, Goldman S, Bhudhikanok GS, Blair A, Chade A et al. Protective glove use and hygiene habits modify the associations of specific pesticides with Parkinson's disease. Environ Int 2015; 75: 144–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldi I, Lebailly P, Rondeau V, Bouchart V, Blanc-Lapierre A, Bouvier G et al. Levels and determinants of pesticide exposure in operators involved in treatment of vineyards: results of the PESTEXPO study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2012; 22: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roff M . The short-term protective effects of ‘non-PPE’ gloves used by greenhouse workers. Ann Occup Hyg 2015; 59: 1044–1057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Patterson MJ, Galloway SD, Nimmo MA . Variations in regional sweat composition in normal human males. Exp Physiol 2000; 85: 869–875.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. EN 1811 Reference Test Method for Release of Nickel from all Post Assemblies which are Inserted into Pierced Parts of the Human Body and Articles Intended to Come into Direct and Prolonged Contact with the Skin. European Committee for Standardization, CEN: Brussels, Belgium. 2011.

  17. OECD Guidance Document 28 for the conduct of skin absorption studies. OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publication Series on Testing and Assessment; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, March 2004, 31 pp.

  18. OECD Guidance Notes on Dermal Absorption. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment (no. 156); Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, August 2011, 72 pp.

  19. EN 374-3 Protective Gloves against Chemicals and Microorganisms – Part 3: Determination of Resistance to Permeation by Chemicals.. European Committee for Standardization, CEN: Brussels, Belgium. 2003, 374-3.

  20. ASTM F739-12 Standard Test Method for Resistance of Protective Clothing Materials to Permeation of Liquids or Gases under Conditions of Continuous Contact. ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2012 Standard.

  21. Pažoureková S, Hojerová J, Klimová Z, Lucová M . Dermal absorption and hydrolysis of methylparaben in different vehicles through intact and damaged skin: using a pig-ear model in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 59: 754–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klimová Z, Hojerová J, Beránková M . Skin absorption and human exposure estimation of three widely discussed UV filters in sunscreens – in vitro study mimicking real-life consumer habits. Food Chem Toxicol 2015; 83: 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaw A, Black C, Harned C . A call for clear and accurate communication about PPE for dermal protection for pesticide handlers. J Pesticide Safety Educ 2015; 17: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Packham CL, Letter to the Editor. Permeation of hair dye ingredients through gloves. Ann Occup Hyg 2009; 53: 771.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. MacFarlane E, Carey R, Keegel T . Dermal exposure associated with occupational end use of pesticides and role of protective measures. Saf Health Work 2013; 435: 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oppl R. Chemical Protective Gloves in-use Protection Time vs. Standard Breakthrough Time. Miljö-Chemie – Eurofins Scientific Group. 2001; Available at https://www.aiha.org/aihce01/handouts/pf126oppl.pdf.

  27. Packham C . Gloves as chemical protection – can they really work? Ann Occup Hyg 2006; 50: 545–548.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Korinth G, Schmid K, Midasch O, Boettcher MI, Angerer J, Drexler H . Investigations on permeation of Mitomycin C through double layers of natural rubber gloves. Ann Occup Hyg 2007; 51: 593–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. ASTM D6978 Standard Practice for Assessment of Resistance of Medical Gloves to Permeation by Chemotherapy Drugs. ASTM Internat: West Conshohocken, PA, USA. 2013.

  30. Gao P, El-Ayouby N, Wassell JT . Change in permeation parameters and the decontamination efficacy of three chemical protective gloves after repeated exposures to solvents and thermal decontaminations. Am J Ind Med 2005; 47: 131–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chao KP, Wang P, Chen CP, Tang PY . Assessment of skin exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide and methyl ethylketone through chemical protective gloves and decontamination of gloves for reuse purposes. Sci Total Environ 2011; 409: 1024–1032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. FAO. Assessing Soil Contamination: a Reference Manual. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2000. FAO Pesticide Disposal Series 8. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/X2570E/X2570E00.HTM.

  33. Lovász ME, Dumitraşcu I, Bălc R . Chlorp-methyl degradation in soil and human exposure. IJSR 2014; 3: 205–208. Available at http://worldwidejournals.com/ijsr/file.php?val=July_2014_1404300916_64.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts RT, Hutson DH . Metabolic Pathways of Agrochemicals: Insecticides and Fungicides. Chlorp-methyl. The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK. 1999 pp 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garrod ANI, Phillips AM, Pemberton JA . Potential exposure of hands inside protective gloves – a summary of data from non-agricultural pesticide surveys. Ann Occup Hyg 2001; 45: 55–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. PubChem. Chemical Structure. The PubChem Compound Database 2015. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pccompound.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grant of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic, VEGA No. 1/0593/14.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

    Martina Beránková, Jarmila Hojerová & Zuzana Peráčková

Authors
  1. Martina Beránková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jarmila Hojerová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zuzana Peráčková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Martina Beránková or Jarmila Hojerová.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beránková, M., Hojerová, J. & Peráčková, Z. Estimated exposure of hands inside the protective gloves used by non-occupational handlers of agricultural pesticides. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 27, 625–631 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.47

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.47

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links