Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Performance of GPS-devices for environmental exposure assessment

Abstract

Integration of individual time-location patterns with spatially resolved exposure maps enables a more accurate estimation of personal exposures to environmental pollutants than using estimates at fixed locations. Current global positioning system (GPS) devices can be used to track an individual's location. However, information on GPS-performance in environmental exposure assessment is largely missing. We therefore performed two studies. First, a commute-study, where the commute of 12 individuals was tracked twice, testing GPS-performance for five transport modes and two wearing modes. Second, an urban-tracking study, where one individual was tracked repeatedly through different areas, focused on the effect of building obstruction on GPS-performance. The median error from the true path for walking was 3.7 m, biking 2.9 m, train 4.8 m, bus 4.9 m, and car 3.3 m. Errors were larger in a high-rise commercial area (median error=7.1 m) compared with a low-rise residential area (median error=2.2 m). Thus, GPS-performance largely depends on the transport mode and urban built-up. Although 85% of all errors were <10 m, almost 1% of the errors were >50 m. Modern GPS-devices are useful tools for environmental exposure assessment, but large GPS-errors might affect estimates of exposures with high spatial variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frei P, Mohler E, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J, Neubauer G, Braun-Fahrländer C et al. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Sci Total Environ 2009: 408: 102–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoek G, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, Vienneau D, Gulliver J, Fischer P et al. A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmos Environ 2008: 42: 7561–7578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huss A, Spoerri A, Egger M and Röösli M . Noise and cardiovascular mortality in Switzerland-a cohort study. Epidemiology 2009: 20: S39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Rabbany A . Introduction to GPS: The Global Positioning System. Artech House: Boston, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodriguez DA, Brown AL and Troped PJ . Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005: 37: S572–S581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seto EYW, Knapp F, Zhong B and Yang C . The use of a vest equipped with a global positioning system to assess water-contact patterns associated with schistosomiasis. Geospatial Health 2007: 2: 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vazquez-Prokopec G, Stoddard S, Paz-Soldan V, Morrison A, Elder J, Kochel T et al. Usefulness of commercially available GPS data-loggers for tracking human movement and exposure to dengue virus. Int J Health Geogr 2009: 8: 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams C, Riggs P and Volckens J . Development of a method for personal, spatiotemporal exposure assessment. J Environ Monit 2009: 11: 1331–1339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Milton R and Steed A . Mapping carbon monoxide using GPS tracked sensors. Environ Monit Assess 2007: 124: 1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu J, Jiang C, Liu Z, Houston D, Jaimes G and McConnell R . Performances of different global positioning system devices for time-location tracking in air pollution epidemiological studies. Environ Health Insights 2010: 4: 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho GH, Rodriguez DA and Evenson KR. Identifying walking trips using GPS data. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011: 43: 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elgethun K, Fenske RA, Yost MG and Palcisko GJ. Time-location analysis for exposure assessment studies of children using a novel global positioning system instrument. Environ Health Perspect 2003: 111: 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips ML, Hall TA, Esmen NA, Lynch R and Johnson DL. Use of global positioning system technology to track subject's location during environmental exposure sampling. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001: 11: 207–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rainham D, Krewski D, McDowell I, Sawada M and Liekens B . Development of a wearable global positioning system for place and health research. Int J Health Geogr 2008: 7: 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiehe SE, Carroll AE, Liu GC, Haberkorn KL, Hoch SC, Wilson JS et al. Using GPS-enabled cell phones to track the travel patterns of adolescents. Int J Health Geogr 2008: 7: 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerr J, Duncan S and Schipperjin J . Using global positioning systems in health research: a practical approach to data collection and processing. Am J Prev Med 2011: 41: 532–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gál T, Lindberg F and Unger J . Computing continuous sky view factors using 3D urban raster and vector databases: comparison and application to urban climate. Theor Appl Climatol 2009: 95: 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cayo MR and Talbot TO. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses. Int J Health Geogr 2003: 2: 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Solheim FS, Vivekanandan J, Ware RH and Rocken C . Propagation delays induced in GPS signals by dry air, water vapor, hydrometeors, and other particulates. J Geophys Res 1999: 104: 9663–9670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rainham D, McDowell I, Krewski D and Sawada M . Conceptualizing the healthscape: contributions of time geography, location technologies and spatial ecology to place and health research. Soc Sci Med 2010: 70: 668–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuessler N and Axhausen K . Processing raw data from global positioning systems without additional information. Transport Res Record 2009: 2105: 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stopher P, FitzGerald C and Zhang J . Search for a global positioning system device to measure person travel. Transport Res Part C 2008: 16: 350–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. de Bruin S, Heuvelink GBM and Brown JD. Propagation of positional measurement errors to agricultural field boundaries and associated costs. Comput Electron Agric 2008: 63: 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the commute and the urban tracking study for carrying the GPS-devices for the data collection, Gerard Heuvelink and Sytze de Bruin from Wageningen University for their help on defining the uncertainty in the error measures, the students from the course RGIC 2010 for their project “Performance of GPS in Urban Areas”, John Bolte for lending us the AD-850 GPS-devices, and Gerard Hoek and George Downward for critically assessing the manuscript. This research was supported by ZonMW grants 85200001 and 85800001, both of the Dutch programme on Electromagnetic Fields and Health Research, The Netherlands. We have no commercial interest in the tested devices, nor do we endorse any of the devices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Beekhuizen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beekhuizen, J., Kromhout, H., Huss, A. et al. Performance of GPS-devices for environmental exposure assessment. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23, 498–505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.81

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.81

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links