Abstract
Although the augmentation index (AIx) is widely used to evaluate arterial stiffness in clinics and research, some conflicting data exist in regard to its validity. We therefore performed a series of studies to test the validity of AIx. The first study in 196 peritoneal dialysis patients showed that AIx in diabetics was lower than that in non-diabetic patients (p<0.05), which was in contradiction with the previous studies. Further analysis showed that AIx was just weakly correlated with pulse pressure (PP)—a known index of arterial stiffness. We also found that the increase of augmentation pressure (AP) was usually accompanied with increased central PP (C-PP). As AP and C-PP are used as the numerator and denominator in the AIx formula, an increase in the numerator (AP) would not necessarily result in an increase of the quotient (AIx) unless the denominator (C-PP) was stable. We then conducted a second study trying to test the validity of AIx through mathematical ratiocination. The increases in the central second peak (P2) and AP were assumed to represent increased arterial stiffness. Different values of AIx were obtained by varying the central initial systolic peak (P1) and diastolic pressure (DP). Mathematical ratiocination showed that AIx was dependent on multiple factors, F=(ΔSP−ΔDP)×(P1−P2)+(Δ P2−Δ P1)×(SP–DP), which suggested that a change of AIx would not always be attributable to changes in P2 and AP. This speculation was further proved by clinical data in our third study. In conclusion, through a series of studies and ratiocination, we showed that the augmentation index (AIx or AIx@75bpm) might not be a sensitive surrogate for a change in central pressure waveforms, which is a manifestation of change in large artery function. The limitation of AIx as an index of arterial stiffness is rooted in its formula, which has a clear mathematical flaw.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Westerhof N, O'Rourke MF : Haemodynamic basis for the development of left ventricular failure in systolic hypertension and for its logical therapy. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 943–952.
Saba PS, Roman MJ, Pini R, et al: Relation of arterial pressure waveform to left ventricular and carotid anatomy in normotensive subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1873–1880.
Lakatta EG : Similar myocardial effects of aging and hypertension. Eur Heart J 1990; 11 ( Suppl G): 29–38.
Nitta K, Akiba T, Uchida K, et al: Left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with arterial stiffness and vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 47–52.
Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA : Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 1980; 62: 105–116.
Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M : Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation 1989; 80: 1652–1659.
O'Rourke MF, Gallagher DE : Pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens Suppl 1996; 14: S147–S157.
Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, et al: Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation 1997; 95: 1827–1836.
Wilkinson IB, Fuchs SA, Jansen IM, et al: Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 2079–2084.
Fetics B, Nevo E, Chen CH, Kass DA : Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46: 698–706.
Filipovsky J, Svobodova V, Pecen L : Reproducibility of radial pulse wave analysis in healthy subjects. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 1033–1040.
Ferro CJ, Savage T, Pinder SJ, Tomson CR : Central aortic pressure augmentation in stable renal transplant recipients. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 166–171.
Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Schwartz JE, et al: Arterial stiffness in chronic inflammatory disease. Hypertension 2005; 46: 194–199.
Schram MT, Henry RM, van Dijk RA, et al: Increased central artery stiffness in impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study. Hypertension 2004; 43: 176–181.
Matsui Y, Kario K, Ishikawa J, et al: Reproducibility of arterial stiffness indices (pulse wave velocity and augmentation index) simultaneously assessed by automated pulse wave analysis and their associated risk factors in essential hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 851–857.
Munakata M, Sakuraba J, Tayama J, et al: Higher brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is associated with more advanced carotid atherosclerosis in end-stage renal disease. Hypertens Res 2005; 28: 9–14.
Tomiyama H, Arai T, Koji Y, et al: The age-related increase in arterial stiffness is augmented in phases according to the severity of hypertension. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 465–470.
Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, et al: Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 2004; 43: 1239–1245.
O'Rourke MF : Basic concepts of pulsatile arterial hemodynamics, in Safar ME, O'Rourke MF ( eds): Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension, 1st ed. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2006, pp 3–19.
Williams B : Pulse wave analysis and hypertension: evangelism versus scepticism. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 447–449.
Kelly RP, Millasseau SC, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ : Vasoactive drugs influence aortic augmentation index independently of pulse-wave velocity in healthy men. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1429–1433.
Lacy PS, O'Brien DG, Stanley AG, et al: Increased pulse wave velocity is not associated with elevated augmentation index in patients with diabetes. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1937–1944.
Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, et al: The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol 2000; 525: 263–270.
Vonesh EF, Moran J : Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 354–365.
Collins AJ, Weinhandl E, Snyder JJ, et al: Comparison and survival of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the elderly. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 98–102.
Benetos A, Rudnichi A, Safar M, Guize L : Pulse pressure and cardiovascular mortality in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 1998; 32: 560–564.
Blacher J, Staessen JA, Girerd X, et al: Pulse pressure not mean pressure determines cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1085–1089.
Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, et al: Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham heart study. Circulation 1999; 100: 354–360.
Lemogoum D, Flores G, Van den AW, et al: Validity of pulse pressure and augmentation index as surrogate measures of arterial stiffness during beta-adrenergic stimulation. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 511–517.
Nichols WW, Singh BM : Augmentation index as a measure of peripheral vascular disease state. Curr Opin Cardiol 2002; 17: 543–551.
O'Rourke MF, Pauca AL : Augmentation of the aortic and central arterial pressure waveform. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9: 179–185.
Kelly R, Daley J, Avolio A, O'Rourke M : Arterial dilation and reduced wave reflection. Benefit of dilevalol in hypertension. Hypertension 1989; 14: 14–21.
Cameron JD, Gatzka CD, Kingwell BA : Assessment of large artery function. Coron Artery Dis 2002; 13: 405–413.
Wilkinson IB, Prasad K, Hall IR, et al: Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1005–1011.
Liang YL, Shiel LM, Teede H, et al: Effects of blood pressure, smoking, and their interaction on carotid artery structure and function. Hypertension 2001; 37: 6–11.
Nitta K, Akiba T, Uchida K, et al: Left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with arterial stiffness and vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 47–52.
Davies JI, Struthers AD : Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 463–472.
Segers P, Carlier S, Pasquet A, et al: Individualizing the aorto-radial pressure transfer function: feasibility of a model-based approach. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 279: H542–H549.
Hope SA, Tay DB, Meredith IT, Cameron JD : Use of arterial transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveform characteristics. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1299–1305.
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L : The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 882–893.
Pravinkumar E : Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted? Lancet 2003; 362: 747.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, LT., Tang, LJ., Cheng, L. et al. Limitation of the Augmentation Index for Evaluating Arterial Stiffness. Hypertens Res 30, 713–722 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.30.713
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.30.713
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Non-invasive parameters of autonomic function using beat-to-beat cardiovascular variations and arterial stiffness in hypertensive individuals: a systematic review
BioMedical Engineering OnLine (2024)
-
Comparison of the usefulness of the cardio-ankle vascular index and augmentation index as an index of arteriosclerosis in patients with essential hypertension
Hypertension Research (2022)
-
Low Dose Resistance Exercise: A Pilot Study Examining Effects on Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index Between Intensities
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention (2020)
-
Association of HIV-infection, antiretroviral treatment and metabolic syndrome with large artery stiffness: a cross-sectional study
BMC Infectious Diseases (2018)
-
Radial augmentation index and diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Diabetology International (2011)