Abstract
The genetical control of heterosis is usually explained in terms of additive/dominance gene action and digenic interaction of segregating loci, and the contribution of epistasis categorized either as duplicate or complementary following the classical relationships observed among the Mendelian genes. In this paper we have explored the alternative relationships between the additive/dominance/epistatic components for obtaining classical ratios and investigated their role in promoting heterosis. The study has shown that while the classical duplicate and complementary relationships supress heterosis, other relationships not only boost its magnitude but also allow more or less unrestricted expression of genotypic variation in the F2 generation. Removal of another important restriction of no interaction between the segregating loci and the background genotype further revealed that heterosis is boosted in the presence of such interactions. However, these interactions do not affect the genetical interpretation of heterosis because their contribution is maximized only when the parental lines display dispersion of alleles at the segregating loci and dominance is unidirectional.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Jinks, J L. 1954. The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics, 39, 767–788.
Jinks, J L. 1955. A survey of the genetical basis of heterosis in a variety of diallel crosses. Heredity, 9, 223–238.
Jinks, J L. 1983. Biometrical genetics of heterosis. In: Frankel, R. (ed.) Heterosis. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, pp. 1–46. Springer, Berlin.
Kearsey, M J, and Jinks, J L. 1968. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity, 23, 403–409.
Kearsey, M J, and Pooni, H S. 1992. The potential of inbred lines in the presence of heterosis. In: Dattee, Y., Dumas, C. and Gallais, A. (eds) Reproductive Biology and Plant Breeding, pp. 371–385. Springer, Berlin.
Mather, K. 1967. Complementary and duplicate gene interactions in biometrical genetics. Heredity, 27, 97–104.
Mather, K, and Jinks, J L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics (3rd edn). Chapman and Hall, London.
Pooni, H S. 1976. Exploitation of inbreds in Nicotiana. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.
Pooni, H S. 1994. Genetics of heterosis and its implications for crop improvement. Ann Biol, 9, 323–332.
Pooni, H S, and Jinks, J L. 1981. The true nature of non-allelic interactions in Nicotiana rustica revealed by association crosses. Heredity, 47, 253–258.
Smith, H H, and Robson, D S. 1959. Inheritance of dimensions of flower parts in tobacco. Proc Int Symp on Biometrical Genetics, Ottawa. Pergamon, Oxford.
Toledo, J F F De, Pooni, H S, and Jinks, J L. 1984. Predicting the properties of second cycle hybrids produced by intercrossing random samples of recombinant inbred lines. Heredity, 53, 283–292.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by a SERC studentship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pooni, H., Treharne, A. The role of epistasis and background genotype in the expression of heterosis. Heredity 72, 628–635 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.86
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.86
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Dissecting the genetic basis of popping ability in nuña bean, an ancient cultivar of common bean
Euphytica (2014)
-
The genetical basis of hybrid vigour in a highly heterotic cross of Nicotiana tabacum
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1994)