Sir,
Penetrating keratoplasty is traditionally performed using a superior approach, with the four cardinal sutures placed at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock hour positions (Figure 1a).1 The second cardinal suture is considered to be the most important suture affecting postoperative astigmatism.2 The areas of donor–host overlap on both sides of the second suture should be equal to ensure even tissue distribution for subsequent suture placement. Ideally, when the four cardinal sutures are properly placed, a diamond-shaped figure should be observed. However, in difficult situations such as narrow palpebral fissures (commonly encountered in the Oriental population), low scleral rigidity, and high vitreous pressure, one may be forced to secure the donor with relative haste at the expense of suboptimal suturing.3
In order to facilitate surgery, especially in the above-mentioned difficult situations, one of the authors (ALY) adopted a modified technique on cardinal suture placement (Figure 1b). In addition to using a temporal approach,4 all of the cardinal sutures are instead placed in the oblique meridians (45° rotation). The first cardinal suture is placed at either the superior or the inferior temporal quadrant of the eye. The second suture is then secured on the nasal side and at the opposite pole of the eye (namely, inferior and superior, respectively) at 180°. A similar manoeuvre is repeated for the third and fourth sutures at above-90° rotation. In the traditional superior approach, the placement of the nasal and superior cardinal sutures may be difficult, owing to a small palpebral fissure, crowding by a high-bridged nose, or a prominent superior orbital rim.4 Furthermore, the horizontal meridian sutures are usually the most challenging, as they require most angulations from the surgeon's forearm, wrist, and fingers. The 45° rotation of these four critical sutures should make their placement easier. This modification has been used at our centre over the past few years without any adverse effects. We would like to suggest this modification to junior surgeons (especially in challenging cases) for their consideration. The same rotation is also applicable to other anterior lamellar procedures.
References
Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ (eds). Cornea. Surgery of the Cornea and Conjunctiva, Vol III St Louis: Mosby, 1997, pp 1627–1630.
Geggel HS . Technique to minimize asymmetric suture placement during penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2002; 21: 17–21.
Young AL, Leung GY, Cheng LL, Cheng AC, Lam DS . Modification of Flieringa ring fixation. Eye 2005; 19: 608.
Smith RJ, Chayet AS, Mondino BJ . Penetrating keratoplasty from a temporal approach. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 517–519.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Dr Patrick MK Tam for his kind assistance in production of the schematic diagram.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lau, T., Young, A. & Lam, P. Cardinal sutures revisited: position modification in corneal transplantation. Eye 24, 1291 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.298
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.298