Introduction

Diabetic retinopathy, one of the microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus, causes visual loss in the working age group.1 Despite advances in treatment such as laser photocoagulation, intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) or vitreous surgery, vision does not improve significantly in many and in some, vision continues to decline.2, 3 The most commonly accepted pathophysiological model for this visual loss is attributed to vascular change (microvascular theory) in the retina, particularly in retinal capillaries: capillary dilatation and increased permeability leading to microaneurysms, haemorrhages, retinal exudates, endothelial cell proliferation and so on.4 The other pathophysiological model, somewhat less investigated, is the neurodegenerative theory.5, 6 The neurodegenerative changes are apoptosis of several neuronal cells including ganglion, amacrine, horizontal, Muller and photoreceptor cells; these changes probably precede microvascular changes.5 These changes explain some of the functional deficits in vision occurring early in the course of the disease. These changes have been studied with neurophysiological, psychometric, histopathological and biochemical experiments, and are supported by the electrophysiological and clinical evidence such as pattern electroretinogram, contrast sensitivity and colour vision.7, 8, 9

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides reliable, reproducible, and objective retinal images and permits quantitative assessment in diabetic macular oedema.10 Spectral domain OCT is a newer-generation high-resolution OCT with the advantages of high-speed data acquisition, three-dimensional reconstruction of acquired retinal images, and improved visualisation of retinal architecture, layer by layer.11, 12 Microperimetry (fundus-related perimetry) has been developed to quantify the functional loss by determining the retinal threshold in the macular area and correlating it with the precise location of oedema (or thickness by optical coherence tomography).13, 14

The purpose of this study is to identify the architectural derangement in neural retina in individuals with diabetes having no diabetic retinopathy and compare with healthy controls, using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and then correlating these anatomical changes with functional loss on microperimetry. The study results might pave way for newer and novel therapeutic approaches—such as neuroprotective treatment—as an adjunct to available options.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective cross-sectional study involving 39 diabetic cases and 39 control healthy participants. The diabetic participants (cases) were recognised based on either the history of known diabetes mellitus, or if the subjects were on treatment for diabetes. All the patients underwent comprehensive eye examination including 45° digital fundus photographs; examination of the right eye alone was done in all the participants, for ease of comparison. We compared the changes observed on SD-OCT in terms of foveal thickness and photoreceptor layer thickness measured in microns and microperimetry in terms of mean retinal sensitivity of the central 20 degrees expressed in decibels in 39 participants with diabetes, but no diabetic retinopathy (cases) with 39 healthy individuals with no diabetes (controls). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria included enroling individuals with or without diabetes, above the age of 40 years; an informed consent was signed by all of the study participants. Exclusion criteria included were best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or less; other ocular diseases such as cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration or any other macular disorders; refractive error of more than 6.0 diopter; poor fixation; pupillary size of less than 4 mm; significant media haze; and history of intraocular surgery or laser treatment.

SD-OCT

The foveal centre was defined by a hyper-reflective dot echo at the innermost retinal layer. All the measurements were carried out at the same point for the uniformity of comparison. The thickness of the foveal neurosensory retina was measured (in microns) by measuring the distance between the red line at the hyper-reflective echo of the innermost retinal layer (representing internal limiting membrane) and the sky blue line at the inner edge of the retinal pigment epithelium (Figure 1a). The photoreceptor layer thickness (PLT) at the fovea was measured (in microns) by measuring the distance between the inner edge of the retinal pigment epithelial layer (sky blue line) and the external limiting membrane. SD-OCT features (Copernicus, Optopol Technologies, Zawierci, Poland) included asterix scan (6 B-scans per second, 2742 A-scans per B-scan), and the length of each scan was 7 mm. All measurements were performed manually by a single observer.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Spectral domain OCT photograph of the macula shows three landmarks: internal limiting membrane, external limiting membrane, and the retinal pigment epithelium. A hyper-reflective echo at the innermost retinal layer, in the inset, represents the foveal centre. (b) Fundus-related microperimetry record shows the retinal sensitivity values in decibels and in false colour coding.

Microperimetry

Using automated fundus-related perimeter, (MP1 Microperimeter, Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy) the fundus was imaged in real time on a video monitor with an infra-red fundus camera (1392 × 1038 pixel resolution, 45° field). The infra-red camera, using auto-tracking followed the patient's eye movement and software compensated for stimulus projection location. The data was registered on a colour picture, and the retinal sensitivity was expressed in decibels. The specifications used in the study included central 20° area, 33 stimulation points, 4-2 threshold, duration of stimulus being 120 ms, Goldmann size III stimulus, white background with intensity of 4 apostilbs (Figure 1b).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 14.0, Chicago, IL, USA). The results were expressed as mean±SD if the variables were continuous, and as percentage, if categorical. Student's t-test for comparing continuous variables, and χ2-test, to compare proportions among groups were used. The P-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Spearman's coefficient was used in the analysis of correlation between retinal thickness and retinal sensitivity.

Results

The study comprised of 78 participants, 39 cases with diabetes mellitus but without diabetic retinopathy, and 39 controls with no diabetes mellitus. There were 43 (55.1%) men and 35 (44.8%) women. Cases consisted of 17 (43.6%) men and 22 (56.4%) women, whereas the controls consisted of 26 (66.6%) men and 13 (33.3%) women. The mean age was 50.92±4.75 years and 49.87±5.50 years, in cases and controls, respectively. Median Snellen's visual acuity was 20/20 in both the groups.

Table 1 summarises the difference in the outcome measures between cases and controls. SD-OCT measured PLT to be 61.62±4.48 μm in cases, and 68.79±7.84 μm in controls (P<0.0001); the FT was 168.64±16.46 μm and 177.74±14.58 μm, in cases and controls, respectively (P=0.012). Retinal sensitivity of the central 20°, measured on microperimetry, was 15.75±3.74 db in cases, and 17.7±1.5 db, in controls (P<0.003).

Table 1 Outcome measures in cases vs controls

Figure 2 shows the microperimetry and SD-OCT records of a control and three cases. As the thickness of the foveal area and photoreceptor layer, as measured on SD-OCT, reduces, the retinal sensitivity, as measured on microperimetry and shown on colour coding, also becomes less.

Figure 2
figure 2

Control, shows normal macular architecture and normal retinal sensitivity (represented by green colour). Case 1 to case 3 shows gradual decline in foveal and photoreceptor thickness and corresponding increase in yellow or red colour on microperimetry (representing reduced sensitivity). (a and b) Microperimetry and SD-OCT pictures of a control patient showing normal retinal sensitivity and central foveal and photoreceptor layer thickness. (c and d) Microperimetry, and SD-OCT pictures of a patient with mild neuronal damage. (e and f) Microperimetry and SD-OCT pictures of a patient with moderate neuronal damage. (g and h) Microperimetry and SD-OCT pictures of a patient with severe neuronal damage showing markedly reduced retinal sensitivity and correspondingly reduced retinal thickness.

Table 2 shows the influence of age and gender on the three outcome variables. Age group less than 50 years showed a statistically significant difference in the outcome measures in cases as compared with controls (FT, P=0.030; PLT, P=0.015; MRS, P=0.020). PLT showed a highly statistically significant decrease in cases as compared with controls in the age group 50 years. Both gender showed a statistically significant decrease in the mean PLT in cases compared with controls; however, significant difference with respect to MRS was observed only in men.

Table 2 Influence of age and gender on outcome measures

Table 3 shows the influence of duration of diabetes and glycosylated haemoglobin on outcome variables in cases. Increased duration of diabetes was inversely related to PLT (P=0.017) only, and not the FT and retinal sensitivity. Glycosylated Hb did not affect the outcome variables.

Table 3 Influence of variables affecting the outcome measures in cases

Discussion

The correlation of SD-OCT and microperimetry parameters for the experimental evidence of early neuronal damage in diabetic participants without clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy has not been explored in the past. The present age-matched case–control study showed that in such individuals with diabetes but no clinical diabetic retinopathy, all of the three outcome variables namely mean FT, mean PLT and MRS were reduced in comparison with controls. The results provided evidence that neural damage possibly precedes clinical diabetic retinopathy. Previous studies have noted mixed results when comparing the macular thickness in type II diabetic participants with no retinopathy and control non-diabetic participants.15, 16, 17 The measurements were recorded with the Stratus OCT, with some showing increased macular thickness in diabetic patients,15, 16 whereas others showing no such correlation.17

Recent evidence suggests that the selective thinning of inner retinal layers supports the concept of early neurodegenerative component in patients with minimal diabetic retinopathy.18 Sufficient evidence also comes from the animal studies that thickness of the inner retinal layers decreases in diabetic condition, indicating early neurodegeneration.19, 20

Although apoptosis in the retinal capillary pericytes is known to cause the early microvascular changes seen in diabetic retinopathy,21 gradual loss of neurons resulting from ganglion cell atrophy and degeneration of the inner nuclear and inner plexiform layers in diabetics has been accepted as an evidence for the early neurodegeneration occurring in diabetic retinopathy.22 What remains to be proven is the sequence of events, that is, whether the apoptotic neuronal cell changes precede the vascular damage, or vice versa.

Although there are reports evaluating central macular function in subjects with diabetic macular oedema using microperimetry with scanning laser ophthalmoscope,23 fundus-related microperimeter24 and multifocal ERG,25 correlation of decreased retinal sensitivity as a corollary to reduced retinal thickness (in participants with no clinical diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy), as measured on spectral domain OCT and MP has not been reported earlier.

This study, in a sub-group analysis, showed significant decrease in all of the three outcome variables in participants with less than 50 years of age, in cases than controls. For participants with more than 50 years of age, only PLT was affected. Increasing age has been noted to have inverse relation with macular thickness in some studies,26 whereas others have not observed this relationship.27, 28

Although poor glycemic control is known to worsen diabetic macular oedema,17, 29 its influence on retinal thickness in patients with no diabetic retinopathy has not been elucidated in this report. However, increased duration of diabetes did reduce PLT. Clinically as well, as the duration of hyperglycaemia increases, the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy rises.30

Several limitations exist in this study. Absence of clinical diabetic retinopathy was based on ophthalmic examination alone. The techniques such as vitreous fluorometry or fundus fluorescein angiogram, used for the early detection of subclinical diabetic retinopathy, would have helped define the study population better.31, 32, 33 Further longitudinal studies with proper selection of the cohort and using additional functional tests such as multifocal ERG would be required in the future to confirm the present hypothesis.

We compared the changes in the central foveal region in the cases and controls; however, the inner retinal layers are absent in the foveal region. Hence, these changes cannot be generalised for the parafoveal thickness measurements. Further studies would be required for the globalisation of the early neurodegenerative changes in diabetic retina.

As newer approach to the patho-physiology of diabetic retinopathy is being investigated by the researchers, the question as to whether the microvascular damage or the neurodegenerative damage is the initiating event is becoming the focus of interest. The results of this paper add to the growing evidence about the alternate pathogenic mechanisms in diabetic retinopathy, that is, neurodegenerative damage. However, the ability of retinal physiological tests soon after the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus to identify patients with a high risk of developing diabetic retinopathy would need to be confirmed in large, longitudinal studies. Once it is confirmed, there would be a paradigm shift in the philosophy, the way we manage diabetic retinopathy today. Future treatment agents would focus on recovery of neural damage besides treating vascular damage and thereby improving the chances of better visual outcomes.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflct of interest.