Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the appropriateness of triage decisions in a busy ophthalmic casualty department and to assess the diagnostic and management skills of eye-dedicated nurse practitioners.
Methods Three hundred and one consecutive patients attending the Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre (BMEC) accident and emergency (A&E) department over a 2 week period were included in this prospective study. Patients were categorised in terms of urgency in concordance with strict guidelines, and the agreement between the final diagnosis and this system of prioritisation was then investigated. To evaluate nurse practitioner (NP) skills, all patients seen and managed by a NP were also assessed by the most senior doctor in casualty at the time in a masked fashion. Waiting times and a breakdown of waiting times were also calculated.
Results Upon establishment of a diagnosis, triage category allocation was found to be appropriate in all 301 cases. Fifty patients (16.67%) were seen by the NP. Of these the supervising doctor concurred with the NP diagnosis in all cases and with the proposed management in 96% of cases. The mean waiting time (± SD) was 83.43 ± 45.84 min, with a range of 5-335 min. The delay before being attended to was greater for less urgent cases as categorised by the triage system.
Conclusion This study confirms the high standard of diagnostic and management skills of the ophthalmic NP and indicates that the triage system of patient prioritisation is accurate. Waiting times in the A&E department remain unacceptable and ways of addressing this include improved ophthalmic training of general practitioners, diverting a greater proportion of non-acute cases to the primary care clinic and expanding the role of the NP.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Jones NP, Hayward JM, Khaw PT, Claoué CMP, Elkington AR . Function of an ophthalmic ‘accident and emergency’ department: results of a six month survey. BMJ 1986;292:188–90.
Vernon SA . Analysis of all new cases seen in a busy regional centre ophthalmic casualty department during a 24-week period. J R Soc Med 1983;76:279–82.
Wong D, Brazier DJ . Primary ophthalmic care: why did patients choose to come to the accident and emergency department? Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1986;105:510–2.
York S, Proud G . Ophthalmic triage. Nursing Times 1990;86:40–2.
VanBoxel A . Improving the triage process. J Emerg Nursing 1995;21:332–4.
Read SM, Jones NMB, Williams BT . Nurse practitioners in accident and emergency departments: what do they do? BMJ 1992;305:1466–70.
McGrath S . The cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners. Nurse Practitioner 1990;15:40–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, S., Beatty, S., Tyagi, A. et al. The role of ophthalmic triage and the nurse practitioner in an eye-dedicated casualty department. Eye 12, 880–882 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.222
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.222
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
The rapid access eye clinic’s playbook: how to cut eye casualty attendance by 50%
Eye (2024)
-
The urgent need to develop emergency EYE care in the UK: the way forward?
Eye (2017)
-
Eye casualty services in London
Eye (2013)
-
Utilization of an ophthalmic casualty — a critical review
Eye (2007)
-
Evidence-based practice in acute ophthalmology
Eye (2007)