Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Outpatient myeloablative allo-SCT: a comprehensive approach yields decreased hospital utilization and low TRM

Abstract

Historically, myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) has required prolonged in-patient hospitalization due to the effects of mucosal toxicity and prolonged cytopenias. We explored the safety and feasibility of outpatient management of these patients. A total of 100 consecutive patients underwent a matched-related donor myeloablative allogeneic HSCT for a hematologic malignancy at a single institution. Patients were hospitalized briefly for stem-cell infusion and thereafter only for complications more safely managed in the in-patient setting. The median hospital length of stay from the start of the preparative regimen to day +30 and day +100 post-transplant was 12 and 15 days, respectively. Planned hospital discharge occurred in 79 patients after stem cell infusion. Patients were readmitted to hospital at median of day +7 post transplant, with neutropenic fever being the primary cause for readmission. In total, 18 patients required no in-patient care in the first 100 days. Non-relapse mortality at day 100 and 6 months was 10 and 15%, respectively, for all patients, and 0 and 5%, respectively, for standard risk patients. In summary, outpatient myeloablative allogeneic HSCT with expectant in-patient management can be accomplished safely with low treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Clinical outcomes seem comparable to those reported for traditional in-patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornelissen JJ, Lowenberg B . Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in current treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2005, 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yanada M, Matsuo K, Suzuki T, Naoe T . Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as part of postremission therapy improves survival for adult patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a metaanalysis. Cancer 2006; 106: 2657–2663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratanatharathorn V, Uberti J, Karanes C, Abella E, Lum LG, Momin F et al. Prospective comparative trial of autologous versus allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 1994; 84: 1050–1055.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Svahn DM, Ringdén O, Remberger M . Long-term follow-up of patients treated at home during the pancytopenic phase after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2005; 36: 511–516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pavletic ZS, Bishop MR, Tarantolo SR, Martin-Algarra S, Bierman PJ, Vose JM et al. Hematopoietic recovery after allogeneic blood stem-cell transplantation compared with bone marrow transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1608–1616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett C, Waters T, Stinson T, Almagor O, Pavletic Z, Tarantolo S et al. Valuing clinical strategies early in development: a cost analysis of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 555–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert C, Meisenberg B, Vredenburgh J, Ross M, Hussein A, Perfect J et al. Sequential prophylactic oral and empiric once-daily parenteral antibiotics for neutropenia and fever after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1005–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters WP, Ross M, Vredenburgh JJ, Hussein A, Rubin P, Dukelow K et al. The use of intensive clinic support to permit outpatient autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1994; 21: 25–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández-Avilés F, Carreras E, Urbano-Ispizua A, Rovira M, Martínez C, Gaya A et al. Case-control comparison of at-home to total hospital care for autologous stem-cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4855–4861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leger C, Sabloff M, McDiarmid S, Bence-Bruckler I, Atkins H, Bredeson C et al. Outpatient autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2006; 85: 723–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulmeister L, Quiett K, Mayer K . Quality of life, quality of care, and patient satisfaction: perceptions of patients undergoing outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation. Oncol Nurs Forum 2005; 32: 57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rovira M . Outpatient management of autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation: the Barcelona experience. Presse Med 2004; 33: 479–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandrasekar PH, Abraham OC, Klein J, Alangaden G, Chalasani G, Cassells L et al. Low infectious morbidity after intensive chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the outpatient setting for women with breast cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 546–551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meisenberg BR, Ferran K, Hollenbach K, Brehm T, Jollon J, Piro LD . Reduced charges and costs associated with outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 927–932.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glück S, des Rochers C, Cano C, Dorreen M, Germond C, Gill K et al. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous blood cell transplantation: a safe and effective outpatient approach. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 431–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Subirà M, Sureda A, Ancin I, Martino R, Altés A, Brunet S et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning is potentially feasible as an outpatient procedure. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 869–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maris M, Storb R . Outpatient allografting in hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant disorders—applying lessons learned in the canine model to humans. Cancer Treat Res 2002; 110: 149–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruiz-Argüelles GJ, Gómez-Almaguer D, Ruiz-Argüelles A, González-Llano O, Cantú OG, Jaime-Pérez JC . Results of an outpatient-based stem cell allotransplant program using nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens. Am J Hematol 2001; 66: 241–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rizzo JD, Vogelsang GB, Krumm S, Frink B, Mock V, Bass EB . Outpatient based bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies: cost saving or cost shifting? J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2811–2818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matthews RH, Emami M, Connaghan DG, Holland HK, Morris LE . Home administration of high-dose oral busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 39: 397–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Millman Research Report: 2008 US organ tissue transplant cost estimate and discussion. 7 April 2008.

  23. Russell JA, Chaudhry A, Booth K, Brown C, Woodman RC, Valentine K et al. Early outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for leukemia and myelodysplasia without protective isolation: a 10-year experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000; 6: 109–114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S R Solomon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomon, S., Matthews, R., Barreras, A. et al. Outpatient myeloablative allo-SCT: a comprehensive approach yields decreased hospital utilization and low TRM. Bone Marrow Transplant 45, 468–475 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.234

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.234

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links