Abstract
An audit was carried out of 51 oncology patients referred to a clinical psychology service to identify the characteristics of patients selected for referral and to assess change following psychological intervention. A survey was conducted of an unselected sample of oncology patients representative of the workload of the oncology department from which the referrals came, to determine the prevalence of comparable psychosocial problems among patients who were not referred for help and to assess whether doctors were aware of the problems patients reported. Data were collected using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) and Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scales and a problem checklist devised for this study. Referred patients were significantly more anxious and depressed (P < 0.001) and showed poorer adjustment on MAC scales than the surveyed sample, but 30% of the latter group warranted assessment for anxiety and 23% for depression. The number of psychosocial problems of their severity. Intervention was clinically significant mood disorder irrespective of the specific problems of their severity. Intervention was associated with a significant improvement in distress and problems for referred patients by the time of discharge. Psychosocial problems were often undetected by staff even in referred patients. The checklist is a feasible screening method for potentially remediable problems which are cumulatively a significant contributor to cancer patients' distress.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cull, A., Stewart, M. & Altman, D. Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 72, 229–235 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.308
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.308
This article is cited by
-
The degree of social difficulties experienced by cancer patients and their spouses
BMC Palliative Care (2018)
-
Learning and memory performance in breast cancer survivors 2 to 6Â years post-treatment: the role of encoding versus forgetting
Journal of Cancer Survivorship (2016)
-
Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation
Supportive Care in Cancer (2011)
-
Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2010)
-
Routine assessment of social difficulties in cancer patients: are we opening Pandora’s box?
Supportive Care in Cancer (2009)