Abstract
A recent trial by the MRC Lung Cancer Working Party used physician assessments to compare two palliative schedules of radiotherapy in lung cancer. A prospective study has been undertaken on a subset of these trial patients to see how physician assessments of symptomatic relief and general condition correlate with patient perception of therapeutic response. In 40 patients followed up monthly from presentation until close to death, good agreement was found between doctors and patients on change in specific physical symptoms and overall physical condition. Doctors were poor judges of life quality at presentation but appeared able to identify relative improvement or deterioration in overall quality of life. In conclusion, physician assessments may constitute valid end-points for radiotherapy trials comparing palliative schedules in lung cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Regan, J., Yarnold, J., Jones, P. et al. Palliation and life quality in lung cancer; how good are clinicians at judging treatment outcome?. Br J Cancer 64, 396–400 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1991.316
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1991.316
This article is cited by
-
No pain relief from morphine?
Supportive Care in Cancer (2006)
-
The impact of surgery on the multidisciplinary treatment of bronchogenic small cell carcinoma
Medical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy (1992)