In the opening paragraph of the News and Views article “Carbon cycle: The blast in the past” (Nature 401, 752–755; 1999) the figure 2,000–4,000 gigatonnes of carbon should have been rendered as 2–4 million million tonnes or 2–4 billion billion grams (not 2–4 billion billion tonnes).
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/44486
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erratum: Carbon cycle: The blast in the past. Nature 402, 249 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/99999
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/99999
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
