Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Feasibility of community neonatal death audits in rural Uttar Pradesh, India

Journal of Perinatology volume 27, pages 556–564 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

Medical audit is a widely promoted strategy in hospitals, but experience within community settings is scant. Community neonatal death audit is a form of audit, which involves a systematic analysis of the quality of care provided in the home, danger sign recognition and care seeking decision making for neonatal illness. This research was conducted in Uttar Pradesh, India, to investigate the feasibility and cultural acceptability of community neonatal death audits.

Study Design:

During November–December 2004, we conducted three in-depth interviews with family members of deceased neonates, and six focus group discussions with family and community members. Three approaches were evaluated: in-depth interview with the family before engaging them in an audit with the community; preliminary meeting to build rapport with the family and community before conducting an audit; and audit with the family and community in a single focus group. Approaches were interactive processes, involving the community, to identify avoidable factors in a particular death and discuss solutions.

Result:

Carried out in a culturally sensitive and non-punitive manner, community neonatal death audit was found to be acceptable and feasible. All approaches provoked formal investigation by community members, and stimulated sharing of views, leading to the self-discovery that community perception was a cumulatively amplified effect of individual perceptions. Presence of an educated/experienced community member or health worker served as a catalyst. No one optimal approach was identified.

Conclusion:

Community neonatal audit is an acceptable approach that shows promise as an effective intervention for improving neonatal health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Graham W, Wagaarachchi P, Penney G, McCaw-Binns A, Antwi KY, Hall MH . Criteria for clinical audit of the quality of hospital based obstetric care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78 (5): 614–620.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ronsmans C, Vanneste AM, Chakroborty J, Van Ginnekin J . Decline in maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: a cautionary tale. Lancet 1997; 350: 1810–1814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones MM, Brugha FR . Using perinatal audit to promote change: a review. Health Policy Plan 1997; 12 (3): 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Perinatal Mortality. A Listing of Available Information. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1996. (WHO/FRH/MSM/96.7).

  5. Supratikto G, Wirth ME, Achadi E, Cohen S, Ronsmans C . A district-based audit of the causes and circumstances of maternal deaths in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bull World Health Organ 2002; 80 (3): 228–234.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Manandhar DS . Perinatal death audit. Katmandu Univ Med J 2004; 2 (4): 375–383.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkinson D . Reducing perinatal mortality in developing countries. Health Policy Plan 1997; 12 (2): 161–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maher D . Clinical audit in a developing country. Top Med Int Health 1996; 1: 409–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) India, 1998–99: India, Key Findings. Mumbai: International Institute for Populations Sciences and ORC-Macro 2000. 32 p.

  10. Willis J . Perceived neonatal morbidities and healthcare utilization for neonatal health in rural Uttar Pradesh, India: effects of a behavior-change communication intervention PhD thesis, Department of International Health: Health Systems, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005.

  11. Zoysa ID, Bhandari N, Akhtari N, Bhan MK . Care seeking for illness in young infants in an urban slum in India. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47 (12): 2101–2111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule S, Deshmukh M, Reddy MT . Burden of morbidities and the unmet need for health care in rural neonates: A prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India. Indian Pediatr 2001; 38: 952–965.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walia I, Kumar V . Utilization of neonatal healthcare in a community. Indian Pediatr 1984; 21: 925–930.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed S, Sobhan F, Islam A, Khuda B . Neonatal morbidity and care-seeking behavior in rural Bangladesh. J Trop Pediatr 2001; 47: 98–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan B, Haws R . Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: review of the evidence. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 519–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Taghreed A, Walker N, Bernis L . Evidence based, cost effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet 2005; 365: 977–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Darmstadt GL, Kumar V, Singh P, Singh V, Yadav R, Mohanty S et al. Community mobilization and behavior change communications promote evidence-based essential newborn care practices and reduce neonatal mortality in Uttar Pradesh, India [poster]. Countdown to 2015: Tracking Progress in Child Survival 2005. London, UK, http://cs.server2.textor.com/programme.html.

  18. Pattison RC, Makin JD, Shaw A, Delport SD . The value of incorporating avoidable factors into perinatal audit. S Afr Med J 1995; 85 (3): 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the families and community members in Shivgarh for their willing participation, and to the members of the field team of the parent study in Shivgarh whose experience and dedication made this study possible. This work was supported by, the Office of Health, Infectious Diseases and Nutrition, Global Health Bureau, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of Award GHS-A-00-03-00019-00, Global Research Activity Cooperative Agreement; the USAID India (New Delhi) Mission; and the Saving Newborn Lives initiative of Save the Children-US, through a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Z Patel, V Kumar, P Singh, V Singh, R Yadav, A H Baqui, M Santosham, S Awasthi, J V Singh and G L Darmstadt: Saksham Study Group: RC Ahuja, S Awasthi, AH Baqui, M Bhandari, N Bharti, GL Darmstadt, A Gupta, S Gupta, V Kumar, RP Misra, S Mohanty, MK Mitra, M Santosham, JV Singh, P Singh, V Singh, PJ Winch, R Yadav.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Z Patel, V Kumar, A H Baqui, M Santosham & G L Darmstadt

  2. Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India

    V Kumar, P Singh, V Singh & R Yadav

  3. Department of Pediatrics, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India

    S Awasthi

  4. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India

    J V Singh

Authors
  1. Z Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A H Baqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M Santosham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S Awasthi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J V Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. G L Darmstadt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the Saksham Study Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G L Darmstadt.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Perinatology website (http://www.nature.com/jp)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, Z., Kumar, V., Singh, P. et al. Feasibility of community neonatal death audits in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. J Perinatol 27, 556–564 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211788

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211788

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links