Sir,
Decentration of intraocular lenses (IOLs) may cause diplopia and functional aphakia. In-the-bag fixation and an intact curvilinear capsulorrhexis are advocated to minimise decentration.1, 2 Sunset syndrome refers to cases where capsular or zonular disruption allows downward IOL displacement.3 We describe a case of sunset-like decentration due to optic–haptic adhesion, in the presence of intact zonules and in-the-bag fixation.
Case report
Following routine phacoemulsification, a single-piece acrylic SA60AT IOL (Alcon Ft Worth, TX, USA) was injected into the capsular bag using a Monarch cartridge. During insertion, the haptic was noted to be folded behind the optic. The optic appeared to be centred at the end of surgery.
At 1 month postoperatively cystoid macular oedema was noted, but no comment made regarding IOL centration. At 2 months postoperatively, the optic was noted to be decentred 2 mm inferonasally within the capsular bag. No zonular disruption was detected (Figure 1). The capsulorrhexis was well centred in the visual axis.
To reposition the IOL, the capsule was separated from the optic with viscoelastic. When the IOL was freely mobile, optic–haptic adhesion was noted. The adherent haptic was released, resulting in recentration of the lens (Figure 2).
Comment
Injectable IOL implantation is popular due to ease of insertion, smaller incision size, and avoidance of IOL contact with the external eye. Hydrophobic acrylic IOLs are favoured as they induce less capsular fibrosis.4 In comparison to three-piece IOLs, optic–haptic adhesion may be more common with one-piece acrylic IOLs due to stickiness and flexibility of the haptics.
Implantation with the Monarch cartridge requires the haptic to be purposely placed on the optic, and the IOL undergoes compression and rotation within the cartridge. Compression of the IOL may be increased by a tight incision, and viscoelastic may influence optic–haptic adhesion. Asymmetric capsule contraction, when there is incomplete capsulorrhexis apposition to the optic surface, may exacerbate optic decentration. Late reopening of the capsular bag is more difficult with acrylic biomaterials due to tenacious capsule–optic adhesion.5
To reduce the risk of decentration, we recommend a capsulorrhexis diameter smaller than the optic, visual confirmation of optic–haptic separation, and centration of the optic within the capsular bag at the conclusion of surgery.
References
Legler UF, Assia EI, Castaneda VE, Hoggatt JP, Apple DJ . Prospective experimental study of factors related to posterior chamber intraocular lens decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 449–455.
Tappin MJ, Larkin DF . Factors leading to lens implant decentration and exchange. Eye 2000; 14: 773–776.
Davison JA . Intraocular lenses. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA (eds). Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology, vol 6. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 2005, Chapter 11.
Werner L, Pandey SK, Escobar-Gomez M, Visessook N, Peng Q, Apple DJ . Anterior capsule opacification: a histopathological study comparing different IOL styles. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 463–471.
Izak AM, Werner L, Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Vargas LG, Davison JA . Single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens explanted within the capsular bag: case report with clinicopathological correlation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1356–1361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
No author has any financial or proprietary interest in the matter presented
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saw, V., Maloof, A. Decentration of a foldable single-piece acrylic IOL within the capsular bag. Eye 20, 1375–1376 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702214
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702214