Sir,
A 65-year-old gentleman noticed blurred vision in his left eye after spraying a cleaning liquid. It was 6/5 and 6/12 in right and left eyes, respectively. Since he had iritis, G. Maxidex was advised 2 hourly in the left eye.
During the follow-up, redness, chemosis, and arterialisation of conjunctival vessels were noted. He had also noticed an occasional swishing noise in the head. The eyes were quiet with no proptosis. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 12 in right and 28 in left eye. Bruit, however, was not heard initially; but became evident in left lateral position with a Valsalva manoeuvre.
Hence, we suspected a left caroticocavernous fistula. A carotid angiography confirmed left type D dural caroticocavernous fistulas (Figures 1 and 2).1 They closed spontaneously the following year.
Dural fistulas are difficult to diagnose. They lack a history of trauma. Redness is absent in a third, bruit in a half, proptosis in 80%, and ocular pulsation in almost all cases.2 IOP is raised only in 38% of all fistulas.3 Hence, noninvasive investigations like ultrasound B scan, CT, MRI, intravenous digital subtraction angiography, and colour Doppler are advised. However, they involve a waiting period and are inconclusive. Although hazardous, carotid angiography is decisive.
A simple clinical test that screens the patients for angiography is useful. A difference in IOP between systole and diastole of more than 1.6 between the eyes is 100% sensitive and 93% specific of caroticocavernous fistulas.4 This requires a pneumo, contact lens, or dynamic tonometer, which are not universally available.5 Standard tonometers are useful if there is a wide fluctuation.6
Another clinical sign, bruit, is heard in arteriovenous communications, Paget's disease, vascular meningioma, carotid and aortic stenosis, and normal individuals.
A bruit can be made audible by worsening the turbulence by increasing the flow through the fistula.
Valsalva manoeuvre increases the flow through the internal carotid artery by 56.5% and supine position redistributes blood from the lower limbs.7 This explains why the bruit became evident later. Hence, eliciting bruit in a doubtful case is helpful, but its predictive value needs to be determined.
References
Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT . Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J. Neurosurg 1985; 62: 248–256.
Newton TH, Hoyt WF . Dural arteriovenous shunts in the region of the cavernous sinus. Neuroradiology 1970; 1: 71–81.
Palestine AG, Younge BR, Piepgras DG . Visual prognosis in carotid-cavernous fistula. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 1600–1603.
Golnic KC, Miller NR . Diagnosis of cavernous sinus AV fistulas by measurement of ocular pulse amplitude. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 1146–1152.
Hoffman EM, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N . Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 2004; 4(1): 4.
Boyles TL, Ralph FT . Carotid cavernous fistula. Am J Ophthalmol 1954; 37: 262–266.
Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Matta BF, Strebel F, Douville C, Newell DW . Effects of the Valsalva manoeuvre on cerebral circulation in healthy adults. A transcranial Doppler study. Stroke 1995; 26(8): 1386–1392.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Haq and Rao for their help.
Financial interests: None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srinivas, H., Murthy, S. & Brown, R. Is Valsalva manoeuvre useful in diagnosing dural caroticocavernous fistulas?. Eye 19, 1226–1227 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701732
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701732