Sir,
In the article published in your journal, direct evidence was submitted for the first time that proteolysis inducing factor (PIF) expression proceeds not only in the tumour, but also in adjacent non-tumour tissues in gastro-oesophageal malignancy (Deans et al, 2006). This fact is in accordance with other ones, for example in tumour-bearing animals; the mitotic activity is also increased in extra-tumour tissues. As a result, liver growth is induced. The pattern of changes of metabolic activity of subcellular fractions of proteins in the liver of tumour-bearing animals correlates significantly with the pattern of changes in homonymous fractions in Zajdela ascites hepatoma (R=0.951) when compared with the intact liver, and in other series of experiments when liver growth was induced by partial hepatectomy, metabolic changes of the same protein fractions in regenerating liver also correlate strongly with those in ascites hepatoma (R=0.954) (Rapoport, 1964). One can suppose that during liver growth after partial hepatectomy, PIF could be also expressed in liver cells as in malignant cells. An indirect evidence in support of this assumption was presented in our work (Rapoport et al, 1996), namely: the content of myofibrillar proteins in white (fast–twitch) muscles is selectively reduced in the presence of regenerating liver in organism as it was found in tumour-bearing animals (Tisdale, 2006). In the latter, this phenomenon is induced by PIF, which activates the proteasome proteolytic system (Tisdale, 2006). Thus, the same mechanism of protein mobilisation from skeletal muscles may be involved in the presence of different foci of growth in organism through PIF production in them and its humoral transport to skeletal muscle system.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Deans DA, Wigmore SJ, Gillmoure H, Tisdale MJ, Fearon KC, Ross JA (2006) Expression of the proteolysis-inducing factor core peptide mRNA is upregulated in both tumour and adjacent normal tissue in gastro-oesophageal malignancy. Br J Cancer 19(5): 751–756
Rapoport EA, Kazaryan VA, Shepelev VG, Goncharoval A (1996) Patterns of adaptive mobilization of proteins from skeletal muscles during development of compensatory hypertrophy of the internal organs. Biophysics 41(1): 123–132. Pergamon (translated from Russian)
Rapoport EA (1964) Peculiarities of metabolic activity of histones in resting and dividing liver cells. Biochemistry (Moscow) 29(1): 61–68
Tisdale MJ (2006) Molecular pathways leading to cancer cachexia. Physiology 20: 52–59
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Rapoport, E. On the possible role of PIF in myofibrillar proteins mobilisation from skeletal muscles in the presence of non-malignant foci of growth in organism. Br J Cancer 98, 242 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604116
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604116
This article is cited by
-
Cancer Cachexia: Traditional Therapies and Novel Molecular Mechanism-Based Approaches to Treatment
Current Treatment Options in Oncology (2010)