Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2006) 94, 1326–1332. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603101

Owing to an author error, the incorrect Figure 5 was included in the paper. The correct version of Figure 5 is given below.

Figure 5
figure 1

Adhesion defect on Matrigel growth after 18 h. (A) Matrigel growth of WT, p300 and EF-wt rescue cell clusters. p300 clones (p300-1, p300-2 and p300-3) cluster poorly into small clusters with ragged edges compared to WT cells. This defect is reversed in EF-wt rescue clones. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the figure above shows a representative example. (B) Graph of cluster size distribution in HCT116, p300 and EF-wt rescue cells. The graph demonstrates the distribution of cluster sizes in HCT116 vs the p300- and EF-wt rescue clones. Experiments were performed in triplicate in all three p300- clones (p300-1, p300-2 and p300-3) and two EF-wt rescue clones (EF-wt rescue-1 and EF-wt rescue-2). Error bars indicate one standard deviation.